Departments of Internal Medicine and Pediatrics, Center for Primary Care, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York.
Department of Internal Medicine, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York.
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2019 Feb;21(2):196-203. doi: 10.1111/jch.13469. Epub 2019 Jan 4.
Initiatives to improve hypertension control within academic medical centers and closed health systems have been extensively studied, but large community-wide quality improvement (QI) initiatives have been both less common and less successful in the United States. The authors examined a community-wide QI initiative across 226 843 patients from 198 practices in nine counties across upstate New York to improve hypertension control and reduce disparities. The QI initiative focused on (a) providing population and practice-level comparative data, (b) community engagement, especially in underserved communities, and (c) practice-level quality improvement assistance, but was not designed to examine causality of specific components. Across the nine counties, hypertension control rates improved from 61.9% in 2011 to 69.5% in 2016. Improvements were greatest among whites (73.7%-81.5%) and more modest among black patients (58.8%-64.7%). The authors noted a considerable improvement in BP within the group of patients with the highest risk (defined as a BP ≥ 160/100) and a decrease in disparities within this group. The quality collaborative identified five key lessons to help guide future community initiatives: (a) anticipate a plateauing of response; (b) distinguish the needs of disparate populations and create subpopulation-specific strategies to address and reduce disparities; (c) recognize the variation across low SES practices; (d) remain open to the refinement of outcome measures; and (e) continually seek best practices and barriers to success. Overall, a large community-wide QI initiative, involving multiple different stakeholders, was associated with improvements in BP control and modest reductions in some targeted disparities.
改善学术医疗中心和封闭式医疗系统内高血压控制的举措已得到广泛研究,但在美国,大规模的社区范围质量改进(QI)举措既不太常见,也不太成功。作者研究了一项针对纽约州北部 9 个县的 198 个实践中的 226843 名患者的社区范围 QI 举措,以改善高血压控制并减少差异。QI 举措侧重于:(a)提供人群和实践水平的比较数据,(b)社区参与,特别是在服务不足的社区,以及(c)实践水平的质量改进援助,但并未设计来检验特定组成部分的因果关系。在九个县中,高血压控制率从 2011 年的 61.9%提高到 2016 年的 69.5%。在白人(73.7%-81.5%)中,改善最大,而在黑人患者中(58.8%-64.7%)则较为温和。作者注意到,高危患者(定义为血压≥160/100)的血压有了相当大的改善,并且在该组中差异有所缩小。质量协作确定了五个关键经验教训,以帮助指导未来的社区举措:(a)预期反应会趋于平稳;(b)区分不同人群的需求,并制定针对特定人群的策略来解决和减少差异;(c)认识到低 SES 实践之间的差异;(d)对结果衡量标准保持开放态度并不断完善;(e)不断寻求最佳实践和成功的障碍。总的来说,一项大规模的社区范围 QI 举措,涉及多个不同的利益相关者,与血压控制的改善和一些目标差异的适度减少相关。