• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Development of a global health bachelor curriculum in China: a Delphi study.中国全球健康本科课程的发展:德尔菲研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 Jan 3;9(1):e023893. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023893.
2
Designing a National Curriculum to Advance Surgical Oncology in Mozambique: A Delphi Consensus Study.设计国家课程以促进莫桑比克的外科肿瘤学发展:德尔菲共识研究。
J Surg Educ. 2021 Jan-Feb;78(1):140-147. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2020.06.030. Epub 2020 Jul 6.
3
What should primary care providers know about pediatric skin conditions? A modified Delphi technique for curriculum development.基层医疗保健提供者应该了解哪些儿童皮肤状况?一种用于课程开发的改良 Delphi 技术。
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2014 Oct;71(4):656-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2014.06.032. Epub 2014 Jul 30.
4
Utilising the Delphi Process to Develop a Proficiency-based Progression Train-the-trainer Course for Robotic Surgery Training.利用德尔菲法开发基于能力的机器人手术培训师培训进阶课程。
Eur Urol. 2019 May;75(5):775-785. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.12.044. Epub 2019 Jan 19.
5
Development of a virtual classroom for pre-analytical phase of laboratory medicine for undergraduate medical students using the Delphi technique.运用德尔菲法为医学本科生开发医学检验分析前虚拟课堂
PLoS One. 2022 Apr 6;17(4):e0264447. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0264447. eCollection 2022.
6
Curriculum development for a national cardiotocography education program: a Delphi survey to obtain consensus on learning objectives.全国胎心监护教育项目的课程开发:一项德尔菲调查以就学习目标达成共识。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2015 Aug;94(8):869-77. doi: 10.1111/aogs.12662. Epub 2015 May 18.
7
Using a Delphi process to develop an effective train-the-trainers program to train health and social care professionals throughout Europe.使用德尔菲(Delphi)流程制定一项有效的培训师培训计划,以培训整个欧洲的卫生和社会保健专业人员。
J Trauma Stress. 2012 Jun;25(3):337-43. doi: 10.1002/jts.21705. Epub 2012 May 30.
8
Assessment of Competence in EVAR Procedures: A Novel Rating Scale Developed by the Delphi Technique.腔内血管修复术(EVAR)操作能力评估:一种通过德尔菲技术开发的新型评分量表。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2017 Jul;54(1):34-41. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2017.04.001. Epub 2017 May 23.
9
Development of a standardized training course for laparoscopic procedures using Delphi methodology.采用德尔菲法开发腹腔镜手术标准化培训课程。
J Surg Educ. 2014 Nov-Dec;71(6):810-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2014.04.009. Epub 2014 Jun 7.
10
Defining the Key Competencies in Radiation Protection for Endovascular Procedures: A Multispecialty Delphi Consensus Study.定义血管内操作放射防护的关键能力:多学科德尔菲共识研究。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2018 Feb;55(2):281-287. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2017.11.020. Epub 2018 Jan 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Preparing for cognitive behavioural therapy: a Delphi exercise to develop a consensus curriculum.认知行为疗法的准备工作:一项用于制定共识课程的德尔菲法研究。
BMJ Open. 2025 Aug 6;15(8):e097681. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-097681.
2
Designing a programme to train social workers on how to promote physical activity for disabled people: A Delphi study in the UK.设计一个培训社会工作者如何促进残疾人身体活动的方案:英国的一项德尔菲研究。
Health Soc Care Community. 2022 Sep;30(5):e2805-e2817. doi: 10.1111/hsc.13724. Epub 2022 Jan 17.
3
Global health education for the post-pandemic years: parity, people, planet, priorities, and practices.后疫情时代的全球健康教育:平等、人民、地球、优先事项和实践。
Glob Health Res Policy. 2022 Jan 4;7(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s41256-021-00234-y.
4
Technical capacities needed to implement the WHO's primary eye care package for Africa: results of a Delphi process.实施世卫组织非洲初级眼保健一揽子计划所需的技术能力:德尔菲法研究结果。
BMJ Open. 2021 Mar 19;11(3):e042979. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042979.
5
Identifying the competencies of China's paediatric residents: a modified Delphi method study.确定中国儿科住院医师的能力:一项改良德尔菲法研究。
BMJ Open. 2021 Feb 17;11(2):e041741. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-041741.
6
A team approach to applying the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health Rehabilitation set in clinical evaluation.团队方法在临床评估中应用国际功能、残疾和健康分类康复版。
J Rehabil Med. 2021 Jan 19;53(1):jrm00147. doi: 10.2340/16501977-2756.
7
Development of a Care Bundle for Stroke Survivors with Psychological Symptoms: Evidence Summary and Delphi Study.针对有心理症状的中风幸存者的护理包开发:证据总结与德尔菲研究
Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2020 Jun 29;2020:7836024. doi: 10.1155/2020/7836024. eCollection 2020.
8
Developing a preliminary questionnaire for the faculty development programme needs of medical teachers using Delphi technique.运用德尔菲法为医学教师的教师发展计划需求制定初步调查问卷。
J Taibah Univ Med Sci. 2019 Nov 9;14(6):495-501. doi: 10.1016/j.jtumed.2019.09.007. eCollection 2019 Dec.

本文引用的文献

1
Critical evaluation of international health programs: Reframing global health and evaluation.国际卫生项目的批判性评估:重塑全球卫生与评估
Int J Health Plann Manage. 2018 Apr;33(2):511-523. doi: 10.1002/hpm.2483. Epub 2018 Jan 5.
2
The Emergence of Undergraduate Majors in Global Health: Systematic Review of Programs and Recommendations for Future Directions.全球健康本科专业的兴起:项目系统评价及未来方向建议
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2017 Jan 11;96(1):16-23. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.16-0687. Epub 2016 Nov 14.
3
Priorities for global research into children's palliative care: results of an International Delphi Study.儿童姑息治疗全球研究的优先事项:一项国际德尔菲研究的结果
BMC Palliat Care. 2015 Aug 4;14:36. doi: 10.1186/s12904-015-0031-1.
4
Global health education in Swedish medical schools.瑞典医学院校的全球健康教育。
Scand J Public Health. 2015 Nov;43(7):687-93. doi: 10.1177/1403494815591720. Epub 2015 Jul 3.
5
Identifying interprofessional global health competencies for 21st-century health professionals.确定21世纪卫生专业人员的跨专业全球卫生能力。
Ann Glob Health. 2015 Mar-Apr;81(2):239-47. doi: 10.1016/j.aogh.2015.03.006.
6
Gaps in studies of global health education: an empirical literature review.全球健康教育研究的差距:一项实证文献综述
Glob Health Action. 2015 Apr 21;8:25709. doi: 10.3402/gha.v8.25709. eCollection 2015.
7
Global health education in the United Kingdom: a review of university undergraduate and postgraduate programmes and courses.英国的全球健康教育:对大学本科和研究生课程及项目的综述
Public Health. 2015 Jun;129(6):797-809. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2014.12.015. Epub 2015 Mar 4.
8
The creation of an institutional commons: institutional and individual benefits and risks in global health interprofessional education.机构共享资源的创建:全球卫生跨专业教育中的机构和个人利益与风险
J Law Med Ethics. 2014 Dec;42 Suppl 2:45-9. doi: 10.1111/jlme.12187.
9
Identifying global health competencies to prepare 21st century global health professionals: report from the global health competency subcommittee of the consortium of universities for global health.确定培养21世纪全球卫生专业人员所需的全球卫生能力:全球卫生大学联盟全球卫生能力小组委员会的报告
J Law Med Ethics. 2014 Dec;42 Suppl 2:26-31. doi: 10.1111/jlme.12184.
10
Understanding the development and perception of global health for more effective student education.为实现更有效的学生教育,了解全球健康的发展与认知。
Yale J Biol Med. 2014 Sep 3;87(3):231-40. eCollection 2014 Sep.

中国全球健康本科课程的发展:德尔菲研究。

Development of a global health bachelor curriculum in China: a Delphi study.

机构信息

Department of Global Health, School of Health Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.

Global Health Institute, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2019 Jan 3;9(1):e023893. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023893.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023893
PMID:30610023
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6326272/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to establish the first global health bachelor curriculum in China.

DESIGN

The Delphi methodology was used to determine expert consensus on which courses should be included in the global health bachelor curriculum. A literature review and a workshop proceeding were performed to generate courses. Then a two-round Delphi process was conducted with 28 invited experts from universities, health administrative departments and non-governmental organisations to rate courses using a 5-point Likert scale. Additionally, the experts could alter, add or delete courses as appropriate. Consensus was predefined as a mean score of 4 or above and the percent agreement (proportion of panel members scoring 'very important' or 'important') no less than 75%.

RESULTS

The responses in the two-round Delphi process were 85.7% and 70.8%, respectively. In the first round, 12 courses did not meet the inclusion criteria and were removed. Based on the participants' comments, 32 courses were included in round 2. In the second round, the consensus was reached on 31 courses which were selected as the final curriculum. These courses were categorised into five modules, including General Knowledge, Methodology, Global Health Issues, Intercultural Communication, and Health Policy and Programme Management.

CONCLUSION

This study established the first global health bachelor curriculum in China. It will provide guidance for other educational institutions to develop similar programmes or curricula in the future.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在在中国建立首个全球健康学士课程。

设计

采用德尔菲法确定专家对全球健康学士课程应包含哪些课程的共识。通过文献回顾和研讨会进行课程设计,然后邀请来自大学、卫生行政部门和非政府组织的 28 名专家进行两轮德尔菲调查,采用 5 分制李克特量表对课程进行评分。此外,专家可以根据需要修改、添加或删除课程。共识定义为平均得分为 4 或以上,百分比协议(评分“非常重要”或“重要”的小组成员比例)不低于 75%。

结果

两轮德尔菲调查的回复率分别为 85.7%和 70.8%。在第一轮中,有 12 门课程不符合纳入标准,被删除。根据参与者的意见,有 32 门课程被纳入第二轮。在第二轮中,有 31 门课程达成共识,被选为最终课程。这些课程分为五个模块,包括基础知识、方法论、全球卫生问题、跨文化交流和卫生政策与计划管理。

结论

本研究在中国建立了首个全球健康学士课程。它将为未来其他教育机构制定类似的项目或课程提供指导。