• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

咪达唑仑或氟哌啶醇预处理预防氯胺酮镇静下成人苏醒期躁动的随机双盲临床试验

Premedication With Midazolam or Haloperidol to Prevent Recovery Agitation in Adults Undergoing Procedural Sedation With Ketamine: A Randomized Double-Blind Clinical Trial.

机构信息

Sina Trauma Research Center, Sina Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Department of Emergency Medicine, Sina Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

出版信息

Ann Emerg Med. 2019 May;73(5):462-469. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2018.11.016. Epub 2019 Jan 3.

DOI:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2018.11.016
PMID:30611640
Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE

We evaluate the effect of midazolam and haloperidol premedication for reducing ketamine-induced recovery agitation in adult patients undergoing procedural sedation. We also compare physician satisfaction and recovery time.

METHODS

We randomized emergency department patients older than 18 years who needed procedural sedation to receive 1 of the following 3 interventions in double-blind fashion 5 minutes before receiving intravenous ketamine at 1 mg/kg: intravenous distilled water, intravenous midazolam at 0.05 mg/kg, or intravenous haloperidol at 5 mg. Our main study outcomes were recovery agitation as assessed by the maximum observed Pittsburgh Agitation Scale score and by the Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale score at 5, 15, and 30 minutes after ketamine administration. Our secondary outcomes were clinician satisfaction and recovery duration.

RESULTS

We enrolled 185 subjects. The maximum Pittsburgh Agitation Scale score was significantly less with midazolam compared with placebo (difference 3; 95% confidence interval 1.27 to 4.72) and with haloperidol compared with placebo (difference 3; 95% confidence interval 1.25 to 4.75), and Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale scores at 5, 15, and 30 minutes trended lower with the active agents. Midazolam and haloperidol significantly delayed recovery but did not alter overall clinician satisfaction.

CONCLUSION

For adult procedural sedation, premedication with either midazolam 0.05 mg/kg or haloperidol 5 mg intravenously significantly reduces ketamine-induced recovery agitation while delaying recovery.

摘要

研究目的

我们评估咪达唑仑和氟哌啶醇预处理对减少接受程序性镇静的成年患者中氯胺酮诱导的苏醒期躁动的效果。我们还比较了医生满意度和苏醒时间。

方法

我们将需要程序性镇静的 18 岁以上的急诊患者随机分为 3 组,以双盲方式在接受 1 毫克/公斤静脉注射氯胺酮前 5 分钟接受以下 3 种干预措施之一:静脉注射蒸馏水、静脉注射咪达唑仑 0.05 毫克/公斤或静脉注射氟哌啶醇 5 毫克。我们的主要研究结局是通过最大观察到的匹兹堡躁动量表评分和氯胺酮给药后 5、15 和 30 分钟的里士满躁动-镇静量表评分来评估苏醒期躁动。我们的次要结局是临床医生满意度和苏醒时间。

结果

我们纳入了 185 名受试者。与安慰剂相比,咪达唑仑组的最大匹兹堡躁动量表评分显著降低(差异 3;95%置信区间 1.27 至 4.72),与氟哌啶醇组相比,差异 3;95%置信区间 1.25 至 4.75),且在 5、15 和 30 分钟时,活性药物的里士满躁动-镇静量表评分呈下降趋势。咪达唑仑和氟哌啶醇显著延迟了苏醒,但并未改变整体临床医生满意度。

结论

对于成人程序性镇静,静脉注射咪达唑仑 0.05 毫克/公斤或氟哌啶醇 5 毫克预处理可显著减少氯胺酮诱导的苏醒期躁动,同时延迟苏醒。

相似文献

1
Premedication With Midazolam or Haloperidol to Prevent Recovery Agitation in Adults Undergoing Procedural Sedation With Ketamine: A Randomized Double-Blind Clinical Trial.咪达唑仑或氟哌啶醇预处理预防氯胺酮镇静下成人苏醒期躁动的随机双盲临床试验
Ann Emerg Med. 2019 May;73(5):462-469. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2018.11.016. Epub 2019 Jan 3.
2
Does adjunctive midazolam reduce recovery agitation after ketamine sedation for pediatric procedures? A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.辅助使用咪达唑仑能否减少小儿手术氯胺酮镇静后的苏醒期躁动?一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验。
Ann Emerg Med. 2000 Mar;35(3):229-38. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(00)70073-4.
3
Rapid Agitation Control With Ketamine in the Emergency Department: A Blinded, Randomized Controlled Trial.急诊科中氯胺酮快速镇静:一项盲法、随机对照试验。
Ann Emerg Med. 2021 Dec;78(6):788-795. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2021.05.023. Epub 2021 Aug 2.
4
Does midazolam alter the clinical effects of intravenous ketamine sedation in children? A double-blind, randomized, controlled, emergency department trial.咪达唑仑会改变儿童静脉注射氯胺酮镇静的临床效果吗?一项双盲、随机、对照的急诊科试验。
Ann Emerg Med. 2000 Dec;36(6):579-88. doi: 10.1067/mem.2000.111131.
5
Rapid agitation control with ketamine in the emergency department (RACKED): a randomized controlled trial protocol.急诊科使用氯胺酮快速控制躁动(RACKED):一项随机对照试验方案
Trials. 2018 Nov 26;19(1):651. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2992-x.
6
Procedural sedation with propofol for painful orthopaedic manipulation in the emergency department expedites patient management compared with a midazolam/ketamine regimen: a randomized prospective study.在急诊科,与咪达唑仑/氯胺酮方案相比,异丙酚进行程序性镇静用于治疗骨科操作引起的疼痛可加快患者管理:一项随机前瞻性研究。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011 Dec 21;93(24):2255-62. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.J.01307.
7
Prehospital Agitation and Sedation Trial (PhAST): A Randomized Control Trial of Intramuscular Haloperidol versus Intramuscular Midazolam for the Sedation of the Agitated or Violent Patient in the Prehospital Environment.院前躁动与镇静试验(PhAST):一项关于肌肉注射氟哌啶醇与肌肉注射咪达唑仑用于院前环境中躁动或暴力患者镇静的随机对照试验。
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2015 Oct;30(5):491-5. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X15004999. Epub 2015 Sep 1.
8
A comparative study of dexmedetomidine and propofol to prevent recovery agitation in adults undergoing procedural sedation with ketamine: A randomized double-blind clinical trial.右美托咪定与丙泊酚预防氯胺酮镇静下成人苏醒期躁动的比较:一项随机双盲临床试验。
Am J Emerg Med. 2021 Dec;50:167-172. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2021.07.059. Epub 2021 Jul 31.
9
Intravenous ketamine plus midazolam is superior to intranasal midazolam for emergency paediatric procedural sedation.静脉注射氯胺酮加咪达唑仑在小儿急诊操作镇静方面优于鼻内给予咪达唑仑。
Emerg Med J. 2001 Jan;18(1):39-45. doi: 10.1136/emj.18.1.39.
10
Ketamine with and without midazolam for emergency department sedation in adults: a randomized controlled trial.氯胺酮联合咪达唑仑与单用氯胺酮在成人急诊科镇静中的随机对照试验。
Ann Emerg Med. 2011 Feb;57(2):109-114.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2010.09.010.

引用本文的文献

1
Major adverse cardiac events with haloperidol: A meta-analysis.氟哌啶醇引发的主要不良心脏事件:一项荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2025 Jun 25;20(6):e0326804. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0326804. eCollection 2025.
2
Comparison of the incidence of recovery agitation with two different doses of ketamine in procedural sedation: A randomized clinical trial.两种不同剂量氯胺酮用于程序性镇静时苏醒期躁动发生率的比较:一项随机临床试验。
Acad Emerg Med. 2025 Aug;32(8):857-862. doi: 10.1111/acem.15116. Epub 2025 Jan 29.
3
Uncovering the Benefits of the Ketamine-Dexmedetomidine Combination for Procedural Sedation during the Italian COVID-19 Pandemic.
探索氯胺酮-右美托咪定联合用药在意大利新冠疫情期间用于程序性镇静的益处。
J Clin Med. 2023 Apr 25;12(9):3124. doi: 10.3390/jcm12093124.
4
Comparison of the effects of dexmedetomidine and propofol in reducing recovery agitation in pediatric patients after ketamine procedural sedation in emergency department.急诊科小儿患者氯胺酮程序镇静后右美托咪定与丙泊酚减轻苏醒期躁动效果的比较
J Res Med Sci. 2021 Aug 30;26:61. doi: 10.4103/jrms.JRMS_661_20. eCollection 2021.
5
Comeback of ketamine: resurfacing facts and dispelling myths.氯胺酮的复苏:重现事实,破除迷思。
Korean J Anesthesiol. 2021 Apr;74(2):103-114. doi: 10.4097/kja.20663. Epub 2021 Jan 11.
6
Candidate Strategies for Development of a Rapid-Acting Antidepressant Class That Does Not Result in Neuropsychiatric Adverse Effects: Prevention of Ketamine-Induced Neuropsychiatric Adverse Reactions.候选策略的快速作用抗抑郁药类,不会导致神经精神不良影响:预防氯胺酮诱导的神经精神不良反应。
Int J Mol Sci. 2020 Oct 26;21(21):7951. doi: 10.3390/ijms21217951.