Suppr超能文献

探索氯胺酮-右美托咪定联合用药在意大利新冠疫情期间用于程序性镇静的益处。

Uncovering the Benefits of the Ketamine-Dexmedetomidine Combination for Procedural Sedation during the Italian COVID-19 Pandemic.

作者信息

Riccardi Alessandro, Serra Sossio, De Iaco Fabio, Fabbri Andrea, Shiffer Dana, Voza Antonio

机构信息

Emergency Department, Ospedale di Imperia, 18100 Imperia, Italy.

Emergency Department, Maurizio Bufalini Hospital, 47522 Cesena, Italy.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2023 Apr 25;12(9):3124. doi: 10.3390/jcm12093124.

Abstract

This retrospective observational study evaluated the safety and efficacy of the ketamine and dexmedetomidine combination (keta-dex) compared to ketamine or dexmedetomidine alone for sedation of patients with acute respiratory distress due to COVID-19 pneumonia who require non-invasive ventilation. The following factors were assessed: tolerance to the ventilation, sedation level on the Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS), hemodynamic and saturation profile, adverse effects, and discontinuation or mortality during ventilation. The study included 66 patients who underwent sedation for non-invasive ventilation using keta-dex (KETA-DEX group, = 22), ketamine (KET group, = 22), or dexmedetomidine (DEX group, = 22). The DEX group showed a slower sedation rate and a significant reduction in blood pressure compared to the KETA-DEX group ( < 0.05). An increase in blood pressure was recorded more frequently in the KET group. No reduction in oxygen saturation and no deaths were observed in any of the groups. None of the patients discontinued ventilation due to intolerance. The mean duration of sedation was 28.12 h. No cases of delirium were observed in any of the groups. Overall, keta-dex was associated with faster sedation rates and better hemodynamic profiles compared to dexmedetomidine alone. Keta-dex is effective and safe for sedation of uncooperative patients undergoing non-invasive ventilation.

摘要

这项回顾性观察性研究评估了氯胺酮与右美托咪定联合使用(氯胺酮-右美托咪定)相较于单独使用氯胺酮或右美托咪定,对因COVID-19肺炎导致急性呼吸窘迫且需要无创通气的患者进行镇静的安全性和有效性。评估了以下因素:对通气的耐受性、里士满躁动镇静量表(RASS)上的镇静水平、血流动力学和饱和度情况、不良反应以及通气期间的中断或死亡率。该研究纳入了66例接受无创通气镇静的患者,使用氯胺酮-右美托咪定(氯胺酮-右美托咪定组,n = 22)、氯胺酮(氯胺酮组,n = 22)或右美托咪定(右美托咪定组,n = 22)。与氯胺酮-右美托咪定组相比,右美托咪定组的镇静速度较慢且血压显著降低(P < 0.05)。氯胺酮组血压升高的记录更为频繁。所有组均未观察到氧饱和度降低和死亡情况。没有患者因不耐受而停止通气。镇静的平均持续时间为28.12小时。所有组均未观察到谵妄病例。总体而言,与单独使用右美托咪定相比,氯胺酮-右美托咪定的镇静速度更快,血流动力学情况更好。氯胺酮-右美托咪定对接受无创通气的不合作患者进行镇静是有效且安全的。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验