International Collaboration on Repair Discoveries, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Faculty of Medicine, Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
BMJ Open. 2019 Jan 4;9(1):e023540. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023540.
Recent studies demonstrate that cardiovascular diseases and associated complications are the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI). Abnormal arterial stiffness, defined by a carotid-to-femoral pulse wave velocity (cfPWV) ≥10 m/s, is a recognised risk factor for heart disease in individuals with SCI. There is a paucity of studies assessing the efficacy of conventional training modalities on arterial stiffness and other cardiovascular outcomes in this population. Therefore, this study aims to compare the efficacy of arm cycle ergometry training (ACET) and body weight-supported treadmill training (BWSTT) on reducing arterial stiffness in individuals with chronic motor complete, high-level (above the sixth thoracic segment) SCI.
This is a multicentre, randomised, controlled, clinical trial. Eligible participants will be randomly assigned (1:1) into either ACET or BWSTT groups. Sixty participants with chronic (>1 year) SCI will be recruited from three sites in Canada (Vancouver, Toronto and Hamilton). Participants in each group will exercise three times per week up to 30 min and 60 min for ACET and BWSTT, respectively, over the period of 6 months. The primary outcome measure will be change in arterial stiffness (cfPWV) from baseline. Secondary outcome measures will include comprehensive assessments of: (1) cardiovascular parameters, (2) autonomic function, (3) body composition, (4) blood haematological and metabolic profiles, (5) cardiorespiratory fitness and (6) quality of life (QOL) and physical activity outcomes. Outcome measures will be assessed at baseline, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months (only QOL and physical activity outcomes). Statistical analyses will apply linear-mixed modelling to determine the training (time), group (ACET vs BWSTT) and interaction (time × group) effects on all outcomes.
Ethical approval was obtained from all three participating sites. Primary and secondary outcome data will be submitted for publication in peer-reviewed journals and widely disseminated.
NCT01718977; Pre-results.
Recruitment for this study began on January 2013 and the first participant was randomized on April 2013. Recruitment stopped on October 2018.
最近的研究表明,心血管疾病及其相关并发症是脊髓损伤(SCI)患者发病率和死亡率的主要原因。颈动脉-股动脉脉搏波速度(cfPWV)≥10m/s 的异常动脉僵硬被认为是 SCI 患者心脏病的一个风险因素。目前,关于常规训练模式对该人群动脉僵硬和其他心血管结果的疗效的研究很少。因此,本研究旨在比较臂式循环训练(ACET)和减重步行训练(BWSTT)对降低慢性运动完全性、高水平(第六胸椎段以上)SCI 患者动脉僵硬的疗效。
这是一项多中心、随机、对照、临床试验。符合条件的参与者将被随机分配(1:1)到 ACET 或 BWSTT 组。将从加拿大三个地点(温哥华、多伦多和汉密尔顿)招募 60 名慢性(>1 年)SCI 患者。每组参与者每周进行 3 次运动,ACET 组每次运动 30 分钟,BWSTT 组每次运动 60 分钟,为期 6 个月。主要结局指标为从基线开始的动脉僵硬(cfPWV)变化。次要结局指标包括:(1)心血管参数,(2)自主功能,(3)身体成分,(4)血液血液学和代谢谱,(5)心肺适能和(6)生活质量(QOL)和体力活动结果。在基线、3 个月、6 个月和 12 个月(仅 QOL 和体力活动结果)评估结局指标。统计分析将应用线性混合模型确定所有结局的训练(时间)、组(ACET 与 BWSTT)和交互(时间×组)效应。
所有三个参与地点均获得伦理批准。主要和次要结局数据将提交给同行评议期刊发表,并广泛传播。
NCT01718977;预结果。
本研究于 2013 年 1 月开始招募参与者,2013 年 4 月开始对第一名参与者进行随机分组。招募于 2018 年 10 月停止。