Fredman Gabriella, Kolpen Mette, Hertz Frederik Boetius, Petersen Pelle Trier, Jensen Andreas Vestergaard, Baunbaek-Egelund Gertrud, Ravn Pernille, Jensen Peter Østrup, Faurholt-Jepsen Daniel
Department of Pulmonary and Infectious Diseases, Nordsjaellands Hospital, Hillerød, Denmark.
Department of Clinical Microbiology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
APMIS. 2019 Feb;127(2):72-79. doi: 10.1111/apm.12913. Epub 2019 Jan 6.
Lower respiratory tract infections (LRTI) are common, but little is known about the response of biomarkers of inflammation in the lungs. Therefore, our primary aim was to compare the concentration of l-lactate to the concentration of neutrophils in sputum and systemic markers of infection. Because it is difficult to differentiate viral and bacterial infection on the basis of clinical presentation in LRTI, our secondary aim was to evaluate if l- and d-lactate may serve as markers of local inflammation as representatives of neutrophils and bacteria, respectively.
Patients with acute LRTI were prospectively recruited. Sputum samples were collected and analysed for neutrophil count, l-lactate and d-lactate. We had data on pathogens from sputum cultures and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) (atypical bacteria, virus) and C-reactive protein (CRP) from blood.
In 44 sputum samples from 32 patients, the median (interquartile range (IQR)) sputum neutrophil granulocyte count was 0.615 × 10 cells/mL (0.236-1.575). The sputum neutrophil granulocyte count was associated with sputum l-lactate (p = 0.011) and CRP (p = 0.018), but not with d-lactate (p = 0.177). There was a strong association between sputum d-lactate and l-lactate (p < 0.0001).
As l-lactate in sputum is closely correlated to sequestration of neutrophils in the lungs, l-lactate is a marker for local inflammation in LRTI and a potential biomarker in clinical management of LRTI. On expectorated sputum, d-lactate had no clinical relevance.
下呼吸道感染(LRTI)很常见,但对于肺部炎症生物标志物的反应了解甚少。因此,我们的主要目的是比较痰液中l-乳酸盐浓度与中性粒细胞浓度以及感染的全身标志物。由于根据LRTI的临床表现难以区分病毒感染和细菌感染,我们的次要目的是评估l-乳酸盐和d-乳酸盐是否可分别作为中性粒细胞和细菌的代表,作为局部炎症的标志物。
前瞻性招募急性LRTI患者。收集痰液样本并分析中性粒细胞计数、l-乳酸盐和d-乳酸盐。我们有痰液培养和聚合酶链反应(PCR)(非典型细菌、病毒)的病原体数据以及血液中的C反应蛋白(CRP)数据。
在来自32名患者的44份痰液样本中,痰液中性粒细胞计数的中位数(四分位间距(IQR))为0.615×10⁹细胞/mL(0.236 - 1.575)。痰液中性粒细胞计数与痰液l-乳酸盐(p = 0.011)和CRP(p = 0.018)相关,但与d-乳酸盐无关(p = 0.177)。痰液d-乳酸盐和l-乳酸盐之间存在强关联(p < 0.0001)。
由于痰液中的l-乳酸盐与肺部中性粒细胞的隔离密切相关,l-乳酸盐是LRTI中局部炎症的标志物,也是LRTI临床管理中的潜在生物标志物。对于咳出的痰液,d-乳酸盐无临床意义。