• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国物理医学与康复委员会初始认证的口腔考试是否存在性别偏见?

Is There Evidence of Gender Bias in the Oral Examination for Initial Certification by the American Board of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation?

机构信息

From the Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (SWD); University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (LRR); and American Board of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Rochester, Minnesota (MMR, CLK).

出版信息

Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2019 Jun;98(6):512-515. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000001126.

DOI:10.1097/PHM.0000000000001126
PMID:30614831
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Unconscious bias may result in a prejudicial evaluation of another person and lead to unfair treatment. Potential gender bias risk exists in the scoring process on the American Board of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation oral examination (Part II) because of the face-to-face interactions between candidates and examiners. This study was undertaken to determine whether performance on the American Board of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Part II examination differed based on candidate gender or configuration of examiner/candidate gender pairings. The impact of examiner unconscious bias training on candidate performance was also assessed.

DESIGN

This is a retrospective observational study of first-time Part II physical medicine and rehabilitation certification examination test takers between 2013 and 2018.

RESULTS

There were significant differences in pass rates (men 84%, women 89%) and mean scaled scores (men 6.56, women 6.81) between men and women (P < 0.001) with the biggest domain score differences in data acquisition and interpersonal and communication skills. Implementation of examiner unconscious bias training did not impact candidate performance.

CONCLUSIONS

Women candidates scored higher and had a higher pass rate than men candidates overall on the American Board of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Part II examination. This difference does not seem to be due to scoring gender bias by the Part II examiners or due to candidate aptitude as measured on the Part I examination.

摘要

目的

无意识偏见可能导致对他人的偏见评估,并导致不公平待遇。由于考生和考官之间的面对面互动,美国物理医学与康复委员会口头考试(第二部分)的评分过程中存在潜在的性别偏见风险。本研究旨在确定美国物理医学与康复委员会第二部分考试的表现是否因考生性别或考官/考生性别配对的组合而有所不同。还评估了考官无意识偏见培训对考生表现的影响。

设计

这是一项对 2013 年至 2018 年间首次参加物理医学与康复认证考试第二部分考试的考生进行的回顾性观察研究。

结果

男性考生的通过率(84%)和平均标准化分数(6.56)与女性考生(89%和 6.81)之间存在显著差异(P<0.001),在数据获取以及人际和沟通技能方面的得分差异最大。考官无意识偏见培训的实施并未影响考生的表现。

结论

总体而言,女性考生在物理医学与康复委员会第二部分考试中的得分和通过率均高于男性考生。这种差异似乎不是由于第二部分考官的评分性别偏见或第一部分考试中考生的能力差异所致。

相似文献

1
Is There Evidence of Gender Bias in the Oral Examination for Initial Certification by the American Board of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation?美国物理医学与康复委员会初始认证的口腔考试是否存在性别偏见?
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2019 Jun;98(6):512-515. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000001126.
2
Performance of Pediatric Rehabilitation Medicine Candidates on the Subspecialty Board Certification Examination from 2003 to 2015.2003 年至 2015 年小儿康复医学候选人在专科委员会认证考试中的表现。
PM R. 2018 Apr;10(4):391-397. doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2017.09.010. Epub 2017 Oct 10.
3
Predictors of Performance on the American Board of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Maintenance of Certification Examination.美国物理医学与康复委员会认证维持考试成绩的预测因素
PM R. 2018 Dec;10(12):1361-1365. doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2018.06.009. Epub 2018 Jun 30.
4
Do Milestone Ratings Predict Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Board Certification Examination Scores?里程碑式评分能否预测物理医学与康复委员会认证考试成绩?
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2021 Feb 1;100(2S Suppl 1):S34-S39. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000001613.
5
Interrater Reliability in the American Board of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Part II Certification Examination: Impact of a New Assessment Design.美国物理医学与康复委员会第二部分认证考试的评分者间信度:新评估设计的影响。
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2022 May 1;101(5):468-472. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000001859. Epub 2021 Aug 4.
6
Does Performance on the American Board of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Initial Certification Examinations Predict Future Physician Disciplinary Actions?美国物理医学与康复委员会初始认证考试的表现是否能预测未来医生的纪律处分行为?
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2019 Dec;98(12):1079-1083. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000001250.
7
A Look at Demographics and Transition to Virtual Assessments: An Analysis of Bias in the American Board of Surgery General Surgery Certifying Exams.人口统计学与向虚拟评估的转变:美国外科学委员会普通外科认证考试中偏见的分析。
J Surg Educ. 2024 Apr;81(4):578-588. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2024.01.001. Epub 2024 Feb 24.
8
Does the Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Self-Assessment Examination for Residents Predict the Chances of Passing the Part 1 Board Certification Examination?住院医师物理医学与康复自我评估考试能否预测通过第一部分委员会认证考试的几率?
PM R. 2017 Feb;9(2):154-158. doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2016.06.012. Epub 2016 Jun 16.
9
Correlation of standardized testing results with success on the 2001 American Board of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Part 1 Board Certificate Examination.标准化测试结果与2001年美国物理医学与康复委员会第一部分委员会证书考试成绩的相关性。
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2003 Sep;82(9):686-91. doi: 10.1097/01.PHM.0000083688.23340.EA.
10
Allopathic (MD) and Osteopathic (DO) Performance on the American Board of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Initial Certifying Examinations.整骨疗法医生(DO)和传统医学医生(MD)在美国物理医学与康复委员会初始认证考试中的表现。
PM R. 2020 Sep;12(9):899-903. doi: 10.1002/pmrj.12311. Epub 2020 Jan 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Examining Gender-Based Differences in Quantitative Ratings and Narrative Comments in Faculty Assessments by Residents and Fellows.研究生和住院医师对教员评估中定量评分和叙述性评论的性别差异研究。
J Grad Med Educ. 2025 Jun;17(3):338-346. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-24-00627.1. Epub 2025 Jun 16.