Suppr超能文献

研究生和住院医师对教员评估中定量评分和叙述性评论的性别差异研究。

Examining Gender-Based Differences in Quantitative Ratings and Narrative Comments in Faculty Assessments by Residents and Fellows.

作者信息

Hane Jessica, Lee Vivien, Zhou You, Mustapha Taj, Culican Susan M, Rider G Nic, Sackett Paul R, Cullen Michael J

机构信息

is an Assistant Professor, Departments of Internal Medicine and Pediatrics, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.

is a Graduate Student, Department of Psychology, University of Minnesota-Twin Cities, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.

出版信息

J Grad Med Educ. 2025 Jun;17(3):338-346. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-24-00627.1. Epub 2025 Jun 16.

Abstract

Learner assessments of faculty are widespread in medicine, yet concerns are growing about possible biases in these assessments and their associations with gender disparities. To investigate gender-based differences in how residents and fellows describe faculty (rater effect) and how faculty are described (ratee effect) in faculty assessments, and their associations with teaching effectiveness ratings. We analyzed 2164 trainee assessments of University of Minnesota Medical School faculty from 2019 to 2023 with trainee and faculty gender information and narrative comments. Using natural language processing, we categorized words and 2-word groups (n-grams) into communal (eg, caring, kind), standout (eg, outstanding, amazing), and agentic/ability (eg, assertive, controlling) groups. We examined gender-based differences in n-grams used by trainees (rater effect) and received by faculty (ratee effect), and relationships between n-gram and teaching effectiveness ratings. Women trainees used more communal (rater effect, incidence rate ratio [IRR]=1.36; 95% CI, 1.27-1.47), standout (IRR=1.20; 95% CI, 1.08-1.34), and agentic/ability words (IRR=1.37; 95% CI, 1.26-1.49; <.001) than men trainees. Women faculty received fewer agentic/ability words than men faculty (ratee effect, IRR=0.83; 95% CI, 0.77-0.90; <.001). Women trainees used fewer communal words when describing women faculty (interaction effect, IRR=0.84; 95% CI, 0.73-0.98; <.05). Teaching effectiveness ratings correlated with faculty n-gram word frequency in standout (men: =0.29, women: 0.28, <.001) and communal categories (men: =0.23, =.003; women: 0.22, =.01). Women trainees used more communal, standout, and agentic/ability descriptors, while women faculty had fewer agentic/ability descriptors. Women trainees used fewer communal words when describing women faculty. Standout and communal word frequency predicted teaching effectiveness ratings for both genders.

摘要

学习者对教员的评估在医学领域广泛存在,但人们越来越担心这些评估中可能存在的偏见及其与性别差异的关联。为了调查住院医师和研究员在教员评估中描述教员的方式(评分者效应)以及教员被描述的方式(被评者效应)的性别差异,以及它们与教学效果评分的关联。我们分析了2019年至2023年明尼苏达大学医学院教员的2164份学员评估,这些评估包含学员和教员的性别信息以及叙述性评论。使用自然语言处理技术,我们将单词和双词组(n-gram)分类为社交类(如体贴、和蔼)、突出类(如杰出、惊人)和能动/能力类(如自信、有控制力)。我们研究了学员使用的n-gram(评分者效应)和教员收到的n-gram(被评者效应)的性别差异,以及n-gram与教学效果评分之间的关系。女学员使用的社交类(评分者效应,发病率比[IRR]=1.36;95%置信区间,1.27-1.47)、突出类(IRR=1.20;95%置信区间,1.08-1.34)和能动/能力类词汇(IRR=1.37;95%置信区间,1.26-1.49;<.001)比男学员多。女教员收到的能动/能力类词汇比男教员少(被评者效应,IRR=0.83;95%置信区间,0.77-0.90;<.001)。女学员在描述女教员时使用的社交类词汇较少(交互效应,IRR=0.84;95%置信区间,0.73-0.98;<.05)。教学效果评分与教员在突出类(男性:=0.29,女性:0.28,<.001)和社交类(男性:=0.23,=.003;女性:0.22,=.01)中的n-gram词频相关。女学员使用更多的社交类、突出类和能动/能力类描述词,而女教员的能动/能力类描述词较少。女学员在描述女教员时使用的社交类词汇较少。突出类和社交类词频预测了男女两性的教学效果评分。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b49a/12168966/b6320694053d/i1949-8357-17-3-338-absf1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验