Public Health Wales, Capital Quarter 2, Tyndall Street, Cardiff, UK.
Br Med Bull. 2019 Mar 1;129(1):13-23. doi: 10.1093/bmb/ldy044.
Roads facilitate trade, development and communication, as well as spread illness and disease, but since mass car use began, the disbenefits, including injuries, pollution and physical inactivity have been significantly magnified. Electric cars are now being seen by many as the solution to the problems associated with internal combustion engine cars.
This article reviews existing literature to determine the extent to which a switch to electrification can solve many of the problems that cars have wrought.
It concludes that there may be some benefits in rural areas, where public transport is poor.
However, it also argues that even in rural areas it may be better to invest in public transport for many, rather than electric car infrastructure for some. It is clear that even for air quality, where electric cars are suggested to offer benefits these are unlikely to be as great as has been suggested. Overall, the negative health consequences of electric cars seem likely to be at least those of internal combustion engine cars.
道路促进了贸易、发展和交流,也传播了疾病,但自从汽车大规模使用以来,包括受伤、污染和缺乏身体活动在内的不利影响已经显著放大。许多人认为,电动汽车是解决内燃机汽车相关问题的一种方案。
本文综述了现有文献,以确定向电气化转变在多大程度上可以解决汽车带来的许多问题。
它得出的结论是,在公共交通较差的农村地区,可能会有一些好处。
然而,它也认为,即使在农村地区,为更多人投资公共交通也可能比为一些人投资电动汽车基础设施更好。显然,即使在空气质量方面,电动汽车被认为具有益处,但这些益处也不太可能像之前所建议的那样大。总的来说,电动汽车对健康的负面影响似乎至少与内燃机汽车一样大。