• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Health Benefits of Strategies for Carbon Mitigation in US Transportation, 2017‒2050.美国交通领域碳减排策略的健康效益,2017 年至 2050 年。
Am J Public Health. 2022 Mar;112(3):426-433. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2021.306600.
2
Health benefits from cleaner vehicles and increased active transportation in Seattle, Washington.华盛顿州西雅图市,更清洁的车辆和更多的主动交通带来的健康益处。
J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2022 Jul;32(4):538-544. doi: 10.1038/s41370-022-00423-y. Epub 2022 Mar 14.
3
Air pollution as a risk factor in health impact assessments of a travel mode shift towards cycling.空气污染作为向自行车出行方式转变的健康影响评估中的一个风险因素。
Glob Health Action. 2018;11(1):1429081. doi: 10.1080/16549716.2018.1429081.
4
Traffic-related air pollution and health co-benefits of alternative transport in Adelaide, South Australia.澳大利亚南澳阿德莱德的交通相关空气污染与替代交通的健康协同效益。
Environ Int. 2015 Jan;74:281-90. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2014.10.004. Epub 2014 Nov 9.
5
Health Impacts of Active Transportation in Europe.欧洲主动出行的健康影响。
PLoS One. 2016 Mar 1;11(3):e0149990. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0149990. eCollection 2016.
6
Health impact modelling of active travel visions for England and Wales using an Integrated Transport and Health Impact Modelling Tool (ITHIM).使用综合交通与健康影响模型工具(ITHIM)对英格兰和威尔士的积极出行愿景进行健康影响建模。
PLoS One. 2013;8(1):e51462. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0051462. Epub 2013 Jan 9.
7
If electric cars are the answer, what was the question?如果电动汽车是答案,那么问题是什么?
Br Med Bull. 2019 Mar 1;129(1):13-23. doi: 10.1093/bmb/ldy044.
8
Mortality Benefits and Control Costs of Improving Air Quality in Mexico City: The Case of Heavy Duty Diesel Vehicles.改善墨西哥城空气质量的死亡率收益和控制成本:以重型柴油车为例。
Risk Anal. 2021 Apr;41(4):661-677. doi: 10.1111/risa.13655. Epub 2020 Dec 24.
9
Integrated Impact Assessment of Active Travel: Expanding the Scope of the Health Economic Assessment Tool (HEAT) for Walking and Cycling.综合出行方式影响评估:拓展步行和骑行健康经济评估工具(HEAT)的评估范围
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Oct 9;17(20):7361. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17207361.
10
Incorporating health co-benefits into technology pathways to achieve China's 2060 carbon neutrality goal: a modelling study.将健康协同效益纳入技术路径,实现中国 2060 年碳中和目标:建模研究。
Lancet Planet Health. 2021 Nov;5(11):e808-e817. doi: 10.1016/S2542-5196(21)00252-7. Epub 2021 Nov 7.

引用本文的文献

1
An Analysis of the Health Effects of Physical Activity due to Active Travel Policies in Rennes, France.法国雷恩积极出行政策对身体活动健康影响的分析。
Wellcome Open Res. 2024 Aug 19;9:154. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.20917.2. eCollection 2024.
2
Projecting non-communicable diseases attributable to air pollution in the climate change era: a systematic review.在气候变化时代预测与空气污染相关的非传染性疾病:一项系统综述。
BMJ Open. 2024 May 7;14(5):e079826. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-079826.
3
Electric vehicles and health: A scoping review.电动汽车与健康:范围综述。
Environ Res. 2024 Jun 15;251(Pt 2):118697. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2024.118697. Epub 2024 Mar 16.
4
Air pollution exposure and cardiometabolic risk.空气污染暴露与心血管代谢风险。
Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2024 Mar;12(3):196-208. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(23)00361-3. Epub 2024 Feb 1.
5
A comprehensive walkability evaluation system for promoting environmental benefits.一个用于促进环境效益的综合步行适宜性评估系统。
Sci Rep. 2023 Sep 27;13(1):16183. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-43261-0.

本文引用的文献

1
The recent and future health burden of the U.S. mobile sector apportioned by source.按来源划分的美国移动行业近期及未来的健康负担。
Environ Res Lett. 2020 Jul 6;15(7). doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/ab83a8.
2
Public Health and Climate Benefits and Trade-Offs of U.S. Vehicle Electrification.美国车辆电气化的公共卫生与气候效益及权衡
Geohealth. 2020 Oct 1;4(10):e2020GH000275. doi: 10.1029/2020GH000275. eCollection 2020 Oct.
3
Long-term exposure to PM and all-cause and cause-specific mortality: A systematic review and meta-analysis.长期暴露于 PM 与全因死亡率和死因特异性死亡率:系统评价与荟萃分析。
Environ Int. 2020 Oct;143:105974. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2020.105974. Epub 2020 Jul 20.
4
The concentration-response between long-term PM exposure and mortality; A meta-regression approach.长期 PM 暴露与死亡率之间的浓度-反应关系;一种荟萃回归方法。
Environ Res. 2018 Oct;166:677-689. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2018.06.021. Epub 2018 Aug 1.
5
Levels of ambient air pollution according to mode of transport: a systematic review.根据交通工具划分的环境空气污染水平:系统评价。
Lancet Public Health. 2017 Jan;2(1):e23-e34. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(16)30021-4. Epub 2016 Nov 26.
6
Land use, transport, and population health: estimating the health benefits of compact cities.土地利用、交通与人口健康:评估紧凑型城市的健康效益。
Lancet. 2016 Dec 10;388(10062):2925-2935. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30067-8. Epub 2016 Sep 23.
7
Health impact assessment of active transportation: A systematic review.主动出行的健康影响评估:一项系统综述。
Prev Med. 2015 Jul;76:103-14. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2015.04.010. Epub 2015 Apr 18.
8
Contrasts in active transport behaviour across four countries: how do they translate into public health benefits?四个国家主动运输行为的对比:它们如何转化为公共卫生效益?
Prev Med. 2015 May;74:42-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2015.02.009. Epub 2015 Feb 24.
9
Health cobenefits and transportation-related reductions in greenhouse gas emissions in the San Francisco Bay area.旧金山湾区的健康协同效益和与交通相关的温室气体减排。
Am J Public Health. 2013 Apr;103(4):703-9. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2012.300939. Epub 2013 Feb 14.
10
2011 Compendium of Physical Activities: a second update of codes and MET values.2011 年体力活动概要:活动代码和代谢当量的第二次更新。
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2011 Aug;43(8):1575-81. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e31821ece12.

美国交通领域碳减排策略的健康效益,2017 年至 2050 年。

Health Benefits of Strategies for Carbon Mitigation in US Transportation, 2017‒2050.

机构信息

Neil Maizlish is an independent epidemiologist based in Berkeley, CA. Linda Rudolph is with the Public Health Institute, Oakland, CA. Chengsheng Jiang is with the School of Public Health, University of Maryland, College Park.

出版信息

Am J Public Health. 2022 Mar;112(3):426-433. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2021.306600.

DOI:10.2105/AJPH.2021.306600
PMID:35196040
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8887169/
Abstract

To quantify health benefits and carbon emissions of 2 transportation scenarios that contrast optimum levels of physical activity from active travel and minimal air pollution from electric cars. We used data on burden of disease, travel, and vehicle emissions in the US population and a health impact model to assess health benefits and harms of physical activity from transportation-related walking and cycling, fine particulate pollution from car emissions, and road traffic injuries. We compared baseline travel with walking and cycling a median of 150 weekly minutes for physical activity, and with electric cars that minimized carbon pollution and fine particulates. In 2050, the target year for carbon neutrality, the active travel scenario avoided 167 000 deaths and gained 2.5 million disability-adjusted life years, monetized at $1.6 trillion using the value of a statistical life. Carbon emissions were reduced by 24% from baseline. Electric cars avoided 1400 deaths and gained 16 400 disability-adjusted life years, monetized at $13 billion. To achieve carbon neutrality in transportation and maximize health benefits, active travel should have a prominent role along with electric vehicles in national blueprints. (. 2022; 112(3):426-433. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2021.306600).

摘要

为了量化两种交通情景的健康效益和碳排放,这两种情景分别对比了最佳水平的体力活动(来自于积极出行)和最小化的汽车尾气污染(来自于电动汽车)。我们使用了美国人口的疾病负担、出行和车辆排放数据,以及一个健康影响模型,来评估与交通相关的步行和骑行的体力活动、汽车尾气排放的细颗粒物污染以及道路交通伤害带来的健康效益和危害。我们将基线出行与每周平均 150 分钟的步行和骑行活动进行了比较,作为体力活动的目标,同时也考虑了最小化碳排放和细颗粒物污染的电动汽车。在 2050 年,即实现碳中和的目标年份,积极出行情景避免了 16.7 万人死亡,并获得了 250 万个伤残调整生命年,用生命统计价值货币化,价值为 1.6 万亿美元。碳排放量比基线减少了 24%。电动汽车避免了 1400 人死亡,并获得了 1.64 万个伤残调整生命年,用货币化价值为 130 亿美元。为了在交通领域实现碳中和并最大化健康效益,积极出行应该与电动汽车一起在国家蓝图中发挥突出作用。(《美国医学会杂志》,2022 年;112(3):426-433. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2021.306600)。