• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

雌雄异株榕小蜂-榕属植物共生关系中雌雄宿主树对制裁机制的差异部署。

Differential deployment of sanctioning mechanisms by male and female host trees in a gynodioecious fig-wasp mutualism.

机构信息

Centre for Ecological and Environmental Sciences, Northwest Polytechnical University, Xi'an, 710072, China.

College of Life Sciences, Northwest University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, 710069, China.

出版信息

Ecology. 2019 Mar;100(3):e02597. doi: 10.1002/ecy.2597.

DOI:10.1002/ecy.2597
PMID:30615203
Abstract

In some insect nursery pollination mutualisms, plant hosts impose net costs to uncooperative "cheater" symbionts. These "sanctions" promote mutualism stability but their precise adaptive nature remains unclear. In fig-wasp mutualisms host trees (Ficus spp.) are only pollinated by female agaonid wasps whose larvae only use galled fig flowers as food. In actively pollinated systems, if wasps fail to pollinate, sanctions can result via fig abortion, killing all wasp offspring, or by increased offspring mortality within un-aborted figs. These sanctions result from selective investment to pollinated inflorescences, a mechanism present in almost all angiosperms. To more fully understand how selective investment functions as sanctions requires the measurement of variation in their costs and benefits to both hosts and symbionts. Gynodioecious fig-tree-fig-wasp mutualisms are particularly suitable for this because pollen and wasps are produced only in the figs of "male" trees and seeds only in the figs of "female" trees. Male and female trees thus incur different net costs of pollen absence, and costs of sanctions to pollen-free "cheater" wasps only occur in male trees. We used the actively pollinated host tree Ficus hispida and introduced into male and female figs either 1, 3, 5, 7, or 9 all pollen-laden "cooperative" (P+) or all pollen-free "cheater" (P-) wasps. Abortion in both male and female trees was highest in P- figs, with P- fig abortion higher in females (90%) than in males (40%). Fig abortion was negatively associated with foundress number mainly in P+ figs; in P- figs abortion was only weakly associated with the number of "cheater" wasps, especially in female figs. In un-aborted male figs, wasp offspring mortality was higher in P- figs than in P+ figs, and in P- figs correlated positively with foundress (cheater) number. Increased offspring mortality was biased against female wasp offspring and likely resulted from reduced larval nutrition in unpollinated flowers. Variation in selective investment to P- figs thus reflects costs and benefits of pollen absence/presence to hosts, variation that translates directly to net costs to cheater wasps.

摘要

在一些昆虫育雏授粉互惠关系中,植物宿主会对不合作的“骗子”共生体施加净成本。这些“制裁”促进了互惠关系的稳定性,但它们的确切适应性本质尚不清楚。在榕果蜂互惠关系中,宿主树(榕属植物)仅由雌性榕果蜂授粉,其幼虫仅以瘿花榕果为食。在主动授粉系统中,如果蜂未能授粉,制裁可能会通过榕果流产而产生,导致所有蜂后代死亡,或者在未流产的榕果中增加后代死亡率。这些制裁是由于对授粉花序的选择性投资而产生的,这种机制几乎存在于所有被子植物中。要更全面地了解选择性投资如何作为制裁措施发挥作用,需要衡量其对宿主和共生体的成本和收益的变化。雌雄异株榕果蜂榕果互惠关系特别适合这种情况,因为花粉和蜂仅在“雄性”树上的榕果中产生,种子仅在“雌性”树上的榕果中产生。因此,雄性和雌性树承担着不同的无花粉成本,并且只有在雄性树上才会对无花粉的“骗子”蜂产生制裁成本。我们使用主动授粉的宿主树榕属植物并将其引入雄性和雌性榕果中,要么引入所有携带花粉的“合作”(P+)蜂,要么引入所有无花粉的“骗子”(P-)蜂,数量分别为 1、3、5、7 或 9。在 P-榕果中,雄性和雌性榕果的流产率最高,雌性榕果的 P-榕果流产率(约 90%)高于雄性榕果(约 40%)。榕果流产与创始蜂数量呈负相关,主要在 P+榕果中;在 P-榕果中,流产与“骗子”蜂数量的相关性较弱,尤其是在雌性榕果中。在未流产的雄性榕果中,P-榕果中的蜂后代死亡率高于 P+榕果,并且与创始蜂(骗子)数量呈正相关。后代死亡率的增加对雌性蜂后代不利,可能是由于未授粉花朵中幼虫营养减少所致。因此,对 P-榕果的选择性投资的变化反映了宿主中无花粉/有花粉的成本和收益,这种变化直接转化为骗子蜂的净成本。

相似文献

1
Differential deployment of sanctioning mechanisms by male and female host trees in a gynodioecious fig-wasp mutualism.雌雄异株榕小蜂-榕属植物共生关系中雌雄宿主树对制裁机制的差异部署。
Ecology. 2019 Mar;100(3):e02597. doi: 10.1002/ecy.2597.
2
Discriminative host sanctions in a fig-wasp mutualism.在榕小蜂与榕树的互利共生关系中存在歧视性的宿主制裁行为。
Ecology. 2014 May;95(5):1384-93. doi: 10.1890/13-0749.1.
3
Fitness reduction for uncooperative fig wasps through reduced offspring size: a third component of host sanctions.通过减少后代数量来降低不合作榕小蜂的适应度:宿主制裁的第三个组成部分。
Ecology. 2016 Sep;97(9):2491-2500. doi: 10.1002/ecy.1471.
4
Host sanctions in Panamanian Ficus are likely based on selective resource allocation.巴拿马榕属植物中的宿主制裁可能基于选择性资源分配。
Am J Bot. 2016 Oct;103(10):1753-1762. doi: 10.3732/ajb.1600082. Epub 2016 Aug 25.
5
Precision of host sanctions in the fig tree-fig wasp mutualism: consequences for uncooperative symbionts.宿主制裁在榕小蜂榕果共生关系中的精确性:对不合规共生体的影响。
Ecol Lett. 2012 Dec;15(12):1362-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2012.01857.x. Epub 2012 Aug 27.
6
Interference competition and high temperatures reduce the virulence of fig wasps and stabilize a fig-wasp mutualism.干扰竞争和高温降低了榕小蜂的毒力,并稳定了榕小蜂的共生关系。
PLoS One. 2009 Nov 12;4(11):e7802. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0007802.
7
Why do fig wasps actively pollinate monoecious figs?为什么榕小蜂会积极地为雌雄同株的无花果授粉?
Oecologia. 2003 Feb;134(3):381-7. doi: 10.1007/s00442-002-1116-0. Epub 2002 Dec 17.
8
Host pollination mode and mutualist pollinator presence: net effect of internally ovipositing parasite in the fig-wasp mutualism.宿主授粉方式与共生传粉者的存在:榕小蜂共生关系中内产卵寄生虫的净效应
Naturwissenschaften. 2009 Apr;96(4):543-9. doi: 10.1007/s00114-008-0502-9. Epub 2008 Dec 24.
9
Ecology of parasite Sycophilomorpha sp. on Ficus altissima and its effect on the fig-fig wasp mutualism.寄生虫 Sycophilomorpha sp. 在高山榕上的生态学及其对榕果榕小蜂共生关系的影响。
Parasitology. 2010 Nov;137(13):1913-9. doi: 10.1017/S0031182010000727. Epub 2010 Jun 21.
10
Why mutualist partners vary in quality: mutation-selection balance and incentives to cheat in the fig tree-fig wasp mutualism.为何互利共生伙伴的质量存在差异:榕树-榕小蜂互利共生关系中的突变-选择平衡与欺骗动机
Ecol Lett. 2017 Jul;20(7):922-932. doi: 10.1111/ele.12792. Epub 2017 Jun 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Who holds the reins? Context-dependent resource allocation in the mutualism between fig trees and their fig wasp pollinators.谁掌握缰绳?榕属植物与其榕小蜂互惠共生关系中的资源分配依赖于环境。
Oecologia. 2024 May;205(1):215-227. doi: 10.1007/s00442-024-05566-3. Epub 2024 May 27.