Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 02138, USA.
Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, 06520, USA.
Ecology. 2016 Sep;97(9):2491-2500. doi: 10.1002/ecy.1471.
Mutually beneficial interactions between two species-mutualisms-are ancient, diverse, and of fundamental ecological importance. Nonetheless, factors that prevent one partner from reaping the benefits of the interaction without paying the cost are still poorly understood. Fig trees and their unique pollinators, fig wasps, present a powerful model system for studying mutualism stability. Both partners depend completely on each other for reproduction, cooperation levels can be manipulated, and the resulting field-based fitness quantified. Previous work has shown that fig trees can impose two types of host sanctions that reduce the fitness of wasps that do not pollinate: (1) fig abortion, which kills all developing larvae, and (2) reduced number of wasp offspring in figs that are not aborted. Here we demonstrate a third component of host sanctions. Through manipulative field experiments, we show that for four of five studied species, offspring of pollen-free foundresses are only 50-90% the size of offspring of pollinating foundresses. We further show that in all four studied species, smaller wasps are less likely to reach and enter a flowering fig to become foundresses themselves. Therefore, the experimentally determined size reduction of offspring is estimated to cause an additional reduction of up to 80% in fitness for a pollen-free foundress. We determine that the size reduction of pollen-free offspring acts on the level of the entire fig fruit rather than on individual flowers. These results show that estimates of the fitness effect of host sanctions on uncooperative symbionts should consider not only offspring quantity but also offspring quality. We discuss implications beyond the fig tree-fig wasp mutualism.
两种物种之间互利的相互作用——互利共生——是古老的、多样的,并且具有基本的生态重要性。尽管如此,仍然不太了解哪些因素会阻止一方从相互作用中获益而无需付出代价。榕树及其独特的传粉者榕小蜂为研究互利共生稳定性提供了一个强大的模型系统。双方完全依赖对方进行繁殖,可以操纵合作水平,并对基于现场的适应性进行量化。先前的工作表明,榕树可以对不授粉的榕小蜂施加两种类型的宿主制裁,从而降低榕小蜂的适应性:(1)榕树流产,导致所有发育中的幼虫死亡,(2)未流产的榕果中榕小蜂后代数量减少。在这里,我们展示了宿主制裁的第三个组成部分。通过可操作的野外实验,我们表明,在所研究的五个物种中的四个中,无花粉的孤雌生殖后代的大小仅为授粉孤雌生殖后代的 50-90%。我们进一步表明,在所研究的四个物种中,体型较小的榕小蜂不太可能到达并进入开花的榕果成为孤雌生殖者。因此,实验确定的后代体型减小估计会导致无花粉孤雌生殖者的适应性额外降低高达 80%。我们确定无花粉后代的体型减小作用于整个榕果而不是单个花朵的水平。这些结果表明,对不合作共生体的宿主制裁适应性的估计不仅应考虑后代数量,还应考虑后代质量。我们讨论了超越榕果榕小蜂互利共生的意义。