Department of Physical Therapy, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA; PhD Program in Rehabilitation Science, College of Applied Health and Science, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Department of Physical Therapy, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
J Biomech. 2019 Feb 14;84:58-66. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2018.12.017. Epub 2018 Dec 14.
The purpose of this study was to determine any potential falls-resistance benefits that might arise from treadmill-slip-perturbation training. One hundred sixty-six healthy community-dwelling older adults were randomly assigned to either the treadmill-slip-training group (Tt) or the treadmill-control group (Tc). Tt received 40 slip-like perturbations during treadmill walking. Tc received unperturbed treadmill walking for 30 min. Following their treadmill session, both groups were exposed to a novel slip during over-ground walking. Their responses to this novel slip were also compared to previously collected data from participants who received either over-ground-slip training (Ot) with 24 slips or over-ground walking (Oc) with no training before experiencing their novel over-ground slip. Fall rates and both proactive (pre-slip) and reactive (post-slip) stability were assessed and compared for the novel over-ground slip in groups Tt, Tc, and Oc, as well as for the 24th slip in Ot. Results showed Tt had fewer falls than Tc (9.6% versus 43.8%, p < 0.001) but more falls than Ot (9.6% versus 0%, p < 0.001). Tt also had greater proactive and reactive stability than Tc (Tt > Tc, p < 0.01), however, Tt's stabilities were lower than those of Ot (p < 0.01). There was no difference in fall-rate or reactive stability between Tc and Oc, though treadmill walking did improve the proactive stability control of the latter. While the treadmill-slip-training protocol could immediately reduce the numbers of falls from a novel laboratory-reproduced slip, such improvements were far less than that from the motor adaptation to the over-ground-slip-training protocol.
本研究旨在确定跑步机滑动扰动训练可能带来的任何潜在防跌倒益处。166 名健康的社区居住老年人被随机分配到跑步机滑动训练组(Tt)或跑步机对照组(Tc)。Tt 在跑步机行走时接受了 40 次类似滑动的扰动。Tc 接受了 30 分钟未受干扰的跑步机行走。在他们的跑步机训练后,两组都在地面行走中经历了一个新的滑动。还比较了他们对这个新滑动的反应与之前从接受过 24 次地面滑动训练(Ot)或没有接受过训练就经历新地面滑动的参与者那里收集的数据。评估了 Tt、Tc 和 Oc 组在新的地面滑动中的跌倒率以及主动(预滑)和反应(后滑)稳定性,并与 Ot 中的第 24 次滑动进行了比较。结果表明,Tt 的跌倒率低于 Tc(9.6%对 43.8%,p<0.001),但高于 Ot(9.6%对 0%,p<0.001)。Tt 的主动和反应稳定性也大于 Tc(Tt>Tc,p<0.01),但 Tt 的稳定性低于 Ot(p<0.01)。Tc 和 Oc 之间的跌倒率或反应稳定性没有差异,尽管跑步机行走确实改善了后者的主动稳定性控制。虽然跑步机滑动训练方案可以立即减少新的实验室再现滑动的跌倒次数,但这种改善远低于对地面滑动训练方案的运动适应。