Suppr超能文献

液滴数字 PCR 定量检测急性早幼粒细胞白血病 PML-RARα:与实时 PCR 的全面比较。

Droplet digital PCR for quantification of PML-RARα in acute promyelocytic leukemia: a comprehensive comparison with real-time PCR.

机构信息

Department of Laboratory Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, No 20, Xisi Road, Nantong, 226001, Jiangsu, China.

出版信息

Anal Bioanal Chem. 2019 Feb;411(4):895-903. doi: 10.1007/s00216-018-1508-6. Epub 2019 Jan 7.

Abstract

Real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR) has been widely implemented for molecular testing, but there are still some inherent limitations that hamper its usefulness. Droplet digital PCR (ddPCR), which can provide direct, standards-free quantification, has recently received increasing attention. In our study, a comprehensive comparison of ddPCR with qPCR in relation to the quantification of PML-RARα was performed to evaluate the diagnostic potential of ddPCR. Results showed that ddPCR displayed significant concordance with qPCR in the detection of PML-RARα in clinical samples, but showed advantages over qPCR in terms of precision, limit of detection (LOD), and other basic performance parameters. A study of the feasibility of duplexing also indicated that ddPCR could simultaneously quantify the target PML-RARα and the clinical common reference gene ABL in a reaction, in contrast to qPCR. Moreover, ddPCR was more tolerant than qPCR of inhibition, and was shown to be able to quantify inhibition-prone samples. Another advantage of using ddPCR in clinical applications is that it will yield accurate results for patients with PML-RARα levels that fluctuate around the LOD of qPCR. Therefore, ddPCR is considered to have the potential to become a reliable alternative technique for quantifying PML-RARα. Graphical abstract ᅟ.

摘要

实时定量 PCR(qPCR)已广泛应用于分子检测,但仍存在一些固有局限性,限制了其应用。近年来,数字 PCR(ddPCR)作为一种能够提供直接、无标准定量的方法,受到了越来越多的关注。在本研究中,我们对 ddPCR 与 qPCR 在 PML-RARα定量方面进行了全面比较,以评估 ddPCR 的诊断潜力。结果表明,ddPCR 在检测临床样本中的 PML-RARα时与 qPCR 具有显著一致性,但在精密度、检测限(LOD)和其他基本性能参数方面优于 qPCR。对双重检测可行性的研究还表明,ddPCR 能够在一个反应中同时定量靶标 PML-RARα和临床常见的内参基因 ABL,而 qPCR 则不能。此外,ddPCR 比 qPCR 对抑制更耐受,并且能够对抑制倾向样本进行定量。ddPCR 在临床应用中的另一个优势是,对于 PML-RARα 水平波动在 qPCR 的 LOD 附近的患者,ddPCR 能够提供准确的结果。因此,ddPCR 有望成为一种可靠的 PML-RARα定量替代技术。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验