Murteira Ana, Sowman Paul F, Nickels Lyndsey
ARC Centre of Excellence in Cognition and its Disorders, Department of Cognitive Science, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
International Doctorate of Experimental Approaches to Language and Brain (IDEALAB), Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Front Neurosci. 2018 Dec 12;12:920. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2018.00920. eCollection 2018.
Previous research suggests that meaning-laden gestures, even when produced in the absence of language (i.e., pantomimed gestures), influence lexical retrieval. Yet, little is known about the neural mechanisms that underlie this process. Based on embodied cognition theories, many studies have demonstrated motor cortex involvement in the representation of action verbs and in the understanding of actions. The present study aimed to investigate whether the motor system plays a critical role in the behavioral influence of pantomimed gestures on action naming. Continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS) was applied over the hand area of the left primary motor cortex and to a control site (occipital cortex). An action-picture naming task followed cTBS. In the naming task, participants named action pictures that were preceded by videos of congruent pantomimed gestures, unrelated pantomimed gestures or a control video with no movement (as a neutral, non-gestural condition). In addition to behavioral measures of performance, cTBS-induced changes in corticospinal activity were assessed. We replicated previous finding that exposure to congruent pantomimed gestures facilitates word production, compared to unrelated or neutral primes. However, we found no evidence that the left primary motor area is crucially involved in the mechanism underlying behavioral facilitation effects of gesture on verb production. Although, at the group level, cTBS induced motor cortex suppression, at the individual level we found remarkable variability of cTBS effects on the motor cortex. We found cTBS induction of both inhibition of corticospinal activity (with slower behavioral of responses) and enhancement (with faster behavioral responses). Our findings cast doubt on assumptions that the motor cortex is causally involved in the impact of gestures on action-word processing. Our results also highlight the importance of careful consideration of interindividual variability for the interpretation of cTBS effects.
先前的研究表明,即使在没有语言的情况下产生的富含意义的手势(即哑剧手势)也会影响词汇检索。然而,对于这一过程背后的神经机制却知之甚少。基于具身认知理论,许多研究已经证明运动皮层参与动作动词的表征以及动作的理解。本研究旨在调查运动系统在哑剧手势对动作命名的行为影响中是否起关键作用。连续theta爆发刺激(cTBS)应用于左侧初级运动皮层的手部区域和一个对照部位(枕叶皮层)。cTBS之后进行动作图片命名任务。在命名任务中,参与者对动作图片进行命名,这些图片之前分别是一致的哑剧手势视频、不相关的哑剧手势视频或无动作的对照视频(作为中性的非手势条件)。除了对表现的行为测量外,还评估了cTBS引起的皮质脊髓活动变化。我们重复了先前的发现,即与不相关或中性启动刺激相比,接触一致的哑剧手势有助于单词生成。然而,我们没有发现证据表明左侧初级运动区在手势对动词生成的行为促进作用的潜在机制中起关键作用。虽然在群体水平上,cTBS诱导了运动皮层抑制,但在个体水平上,我们发现cTBS对运动皮层的影响存在显著差异。我们发现cTBS既诱导了皮质脊髓活动的抑制(行为反应较慢),也诱导了增强(行为反应较快)。我们的研究结果对运动皮层因果性参与手势对动作词加工的影响这一假设提出了质疑。我们的结果还强调了在解释cTBS效应时仔细考虑个体间差异的重要性。