• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在一种新兴手语中构建复杂性

Constructing Complexity in a Young Sign Language.

作者信息

Dachkovsky Svetlana, Stamp Rose, Sandler Wendy

机构信息

Sign Language Research Laboratory, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2018 Dec 13;9:2202. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02202. eCollection 2018.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02202
PMID:30618892
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6306080/
Abstract

A universally acknowledged, core property of language is its complexity, at each level of structure - sounds, words, phrases, clauses, utterances, and higher levels of discourse. How does this complexity originate and develop in a language? We cannot fully answer this question from spoken languages, since they are all thousands of years old or descended from old languages. However, sign languages of deaf communities can arise at any time and provide empirical data for testing hypotheses related to the emergence of language complexity. An added advantage of the signed modality is a correspondence between visible physical articulations and linguistic structures, providing a more transparent view of linguistic complexity and its emergence (Sandler, 2012). These essential characteristics of sign languages allow us to address the issue of emerging complexity by documenting the use of the body for linguistic purposes. We look at three types of discourse relations of increasing complexity motivated by research on spoken languages - additive, symmetric, and asymmetric (Mann and Thompson, 1988; Sanders et al., 1992). Each relation type can connect units at two different levels: within propositions (simpler) and across propositions (more complex). We hypothesized that these relations provide a measure for charting the time course of emergence of complexity, from simplest to most complex, in a new sign language. We test this hypothesis on Israeli Sign Language (ISL), a young language, some of whose earliest users are still available for recording. Taking advantage of the unique relation in sign languages between bodily articulations and linguistic form, we study fifteen ISL signers from three generations, and demonstrate that the predictions indeed hold. We also find that younger signers tend to converge on more systematic marking of relations, that they use fewer articulators for a given linguistic function than older signers, and that the form of articulations becomes reduced, as the language matures. Mapping discourse relations to the bodily expression of linguistic components across age groups reveals how simpler, less constrained, and more gesture-like expressions, become language.

摘要

语言一个普遍公认的核心特性是其在各个结构层面——语音、单词、短语、从句、话语以及更高层次的语篇——的复杂性。这种复杂性在一种语言中是如何产生和发展的呢?我们无法从口语语言中完全回答这个问题,因为它们都有数千年的历史,或者是古老语言的后代。然而,聋人社区的手语可以在任何时候出现,并为检验与语言复杂性出现相关的假设提供实证数据。手语模态的一个额外优势是可见的身体动作与语言结构之间的对应关系,这为语言复杂性及其出现提供了更清晰的视角(桑德勒,2012)。手语的这些基本特征使我们能够通过记录身体用于语言目的的方式来解决新兴复杂性的问题。我们研究了受口语语言研究启发的三种复杂性不断增加的语篇关系——累加性、对称性和不对称性(曼和汤普森,1988;桑德斯等人,1992)。每种关系类型都可以连接两个不同层面的单位:命题内部(较简单)和命题之间(较复杂)。我们假设这些关系为描绘一种新的手语中从最简单到最复杂的复杂性出现的时间进程提供了一种度量。我们在以色列手语(ISL)上检验这个假设,以色列手语是一种年轻的语言,其一些最早的使用者仍然可以进行记录。利用手语中身体动作与语言形式之间的独特关系,我们研究了三代的十五名以色列手语使用者,并证明这些预测确实成立。我们还发现,年轻的手语使用者倾向于在关系的标记上更加系统,对于给定的语言功能,他们使用的发音器官比年长的手语使用者少,并且随着语言的成熟,动作的形式变得更加简化。将语篇关系映射到不同年龄组语言成分的身体表达上,揭示了更简单、限制更少且更像手势的表达是如何变成语言的。

相似文献

1
Constructing Complexity in a Young Sign Language.在一种新兴手语中构建复杂性
Front Psychol. 2018 Dec 13;9:2202. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02202. eCollection 2018.
2
Handling Sign Language Data: The Impact of Modality.处理手语数据:模态的影响
Front Psychol. 2019 Mar 12;10:483. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00483. eCollection 2019.
3
The Body as Evidence for the Nature of Language.身体作为语言本质的证据。
Front Psychol. 2018 Oct 29;9:1782. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01782. eCollection 2018.
4
When does a system become phonological? Handshape production in gesturers, signers, and homesigners.一个系统何时成为音系的?手势者、手语使用者和自创手势者的手型产生。
Nat Lang Linguist Theory. 2012 Feb 1;30(1):1-31. doi: 10.1007/s11049-011-9145-1.
5
Linguistic Variation, Discourse Analysis, and Deaf Education: Case Studies from ISL.语言变异、话语分析与聋人教育:来自手语的案例研究
J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2022 Dec 23;28(1):84-98. doi: 10.1093/deafed/enac030.
6
Sociolinguistic Typology and Sign Languages.社会语言类型学与手语
Front Psychol. 2018 Feb 21;9:200. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00200. eCollection 2018.
7
Cross-linguistic differences in the neural representation of human language: evidence from users of signed languages.跨语言的人类语言神经表示差异:来自手语使用者的证据。
Front Psychol. 2013 Jan 2;3:587. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00587. eCollection 2012.
8
Neural systems supporting linguistic structure, linguistic experience, and symbolic communication in sign language and gesture.支持手语和手势中语言结构、语言经验及符号交流的神经系统。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Sep 15;112(37):11684-9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1510527112. Epub 2015 Aug 17.
9
An Eye Tracking Study on the Perception and Comprehension of Unimodal and Bimodal Linguistic Inputs by Deaf Adolescents.一项关于聋哑青少年对单峰和双峰语言输入的感知与理解的眼动追踪研究。
Front Psychol. 2017 Jun 21;8:1044. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01044. eCollection 2017.
10
Ten things you should know about sign languages.关于手语你应该知道的十件事。
Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2023 Oct;32(5):387-394. doi: 10.1177/09637214231173071. Epub 2023 May 15.

引用本文的文献

1
The (Co)Evolution of Language and Music Under Human Self-Domestication.人类自我驯化下语言和音乐的(共同)演变。
Hum Nat. 2023 Jun;34(2):229-275. doi: 10.1007/s12110-023-09447-1. Epub 2023 Apr 25.
2
Disentangling Pantomime From Early Sign in a New Sign Language: Window Into Language Evolution Research.从一种新手语中区分早期手势与哑剧手势:通往语言进化研究的窗口
Front Psychol. 2021 Apr 14;12:640057. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.640057. eCollection 2021.
3
Talking with hands: body representation in British Sign Language users.用手交谈:英国手语使用者的身体表现。

本文引用的文献

1
The Body as Evidence for the Nature of Language.身体作为语言本质的证据。
Front Psychol. 2018 Oct 29;9:1782. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01782. eCollection 2018.
2
The emergence of temporal language in Nicaraguan Sign Language.尼加拉瓜手语中时间性语言的出现。
Cognition. 2016 Nov;156:147-163. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2016.08.005. Epub 2016 Aug 31.
3
Referential shift in Nicaraguan Sign Language: a transition from lexical to spatial devices.尼加拉瓜手语中的指称转移:从词汇装置到空间装置的转变。
Exp Brain Res. 2021 Mar;239(3):731-744. doi: 10.1007/s00221-020-06013-4. Epub 2021 Jan 3.
4
The Body as Evidence for the Nature of Language.身体作为语言本质的证据。
Front Psychol. 2018 Oct 29;9:1782. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01782. eCollection 2018.
Front Psychol. 2015 Jan 9;5:1540. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01540. eCollection 2014.
4
The emergence of complexity in prosody and syntax.韵律和句法中复杂性的出现。
Lingua. 2011 Oct;121(13):2014-2033. doi: 10.1016/j.lingua.2011.05.007.
5
The Roots of Linguistic Organization in a New Language.一门新语言中语言组织的根源
Interact Stud. 2008;9(1):133-153. doi: 10.1075/is.9.1.10aro.
6
Prosody and Syntax in Sign Languages.手语中的韵律和句法。
Trans Philol Soc. 2010 Nov;108(3):298-328. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-968X.2010.01242.x.
7
Eliminating unpredictable variation through iterated learning.通过迭代学习消除不可预测的变化。
Cognition. 2010 Sep;116(3):444-9. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2010.06.004. Epub 2010 Jul 7.
8
Redundancy and reduction: speakers manage syntactic information density.冗余与简化:说话者如何管理句法信息密度
Cogn Psychol. 2010 Aug;61(1):23-62. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2010.02.002.
9
Language structure is partly determined by social structure.语言结构在一定程度上由社会结构决定。
PLoS One. 2010 Jan 20;5(1):e8559. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0008559.
10
Categorical Data Analysis: Away from ANOVAs (transformation or not) and towards Logit Mixed Models.分类数据分析:远离方差分析(无论是否进行变换),转向逻辑混合模型。
J Mem Lang. 2008 Nov;59(4):434-446. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2007.11.007.