• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

实施和评估全国范围内的手术安全检查表的推广。

Implementation and evaluation of nationwide scale-up of the Surgical Safety Checklist.

机构信息

Department of Medical Capacity Building, Mercy Ships Africa Bureau, Cotonou, Benin.

Centre for Global Health and Health Partnerships, King's College London, London, UK.

出版信息

Br J Surg. 2019 Jan;106(2):e91-e102. doi: 10.1002/bjs.11034.

DOI:10.1002/bjs.11034
PMID:30620076
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6519364/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The WHO Surgical Safety Checklist improves surgical outcomes, but evidence and theoretical frameworks for successful implementation in low-income countries remain lacking. Based on previous research in Madagascar, a nationwide checklist implementation in Benin was designed and evaluated longitudinally.

METHODS

This study had a longitudinal embedded mixed-methods design. The well validated Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) was used to structure the approach and evaluate the implementation. Thirty-six hospitals received 3-day multidisciplinary training and 4-month follow-up. Seventeen hospitals were sampled purposively for evaluation at 12-18 months. The primary outcome was sustainability of checklist use at 12-18 months measured by questionnaire. Secondary outcomes were CFIR-derived implementation outcomes, measured using the WHO Behaviourally Anchored Rating Scale (WHOBARS), safety questionnaires and focus groups.

RESULTS

At 12-18 months, 86·0 per cent of participants (86 of 100) reported checklist use compared with 31·1 per cent (169 of 543) before training and 88·8 per cent (158 of 178) at 4 months. There was high-fidelity use (median WHOBARS score 5·0 of 7; use of basic safety processes ranged from 85·0 to 99·0 per cent), and high penetration shown by a significant improvement in hospital safety culture (adapted Human Factors Attitude Questionnaire scores of 76·7, 81·1 and 82·2 per cent before, and at 4 and 12-18 months after training respectively; P < 0·001). Acceptability, adoption, appropriateness and feasibility scored 9·6-9·8 of 10. This approach incorporated 31 of 36 CFIR implementation constructs successfully.

CONCLUSION

This study shows successfully sustained nationwide checklist implementation using a validated implementation framework.

摘要

背景

世界卫生组织手术安全检查表可改善手术效果,但在低收入国家成功实施的证据和理论框架仍有所欠缺。基于马达加斯加的前期研究,贝宁全国范围内实施了该检查表,并进行了纵向评估。

方法

本研究采用纵向嵌入式混合方法设计。经充分验证的实施研究综合框架(CFIR)被用于构建方法并评估实施情况。36 家医院接受了为期 3 天的多学科培训和 4 个月的随访。17 家医院被有针对性地抽取用于 12-18 个月的评估。主要结局是通过问卷调查评估 12-18 个月时检查表使用的可持续性。次要结局是使用世卫组织行为锚定评定量表(WHOBARS)、安全性问卷和焦点小组评估 CFIR 得出的实施结局。

结果

在 12-18 个月时,86.0%(100 人中的 86 人)的参与者报告了检查表的使用情况,而培训前为 31.1%(543 人中的 169 人),培训后 4 个月为 88.8%(178 人中的 158 人)。实施过程具有高保真度(中位 WHOBARS 评分为 7 分中的 5.0 分;基本安全流程的使用率为 85.0%-99.0%),医院安全文化显著改善,表明实施过程渗透度高(经过培训前后分别为 76.7%、81.1%和 82.2%的适应人类因素态度问卷评分;P<0.001)。接受度、采纳度、适宜度和可行性评分分别为 10 分中的 9.6-9.8 分。该方法成功地整合了 36 个 CFIR 实施结构中的 31 个。

结论

本研究采用经验证的实施框架,成功地持续开展了全国范围内的检查表实施。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/105f/6519364/da1e0ced80c3/BJS-106-e91-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/105f/6519364/825c0cb2ed89/BJS-106-e91-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/105f/6519364/da1e0ced80c3/BJS-106-e91-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/105f/6519364/825c0cb2ed89/BJS-106-e91-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/105f/6519364/da1e0ced80c3/BJS-106-e91-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Implementation and evaluation of nationwide scale-up of the Surgical Safety Checklist.实施和评估全国范围内的手术安全检查表的推广。
Br J Surg. 2019 Jan;106(2):e91-e102. doi: 10.1002/bjs.11034.
2
Using the Knowledge to Action Framework to Describe a Nationwide Implementation of the WHO Surgical Safety Checklist in Cameroon.运用知识转化行动框架描述在喀麦隆全国范围内实施世界卫生组织手术安全核对表。
Anesth Analg. 2020 May;130(5):1425-1434. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000004586.
3
Sustainability of using the WHO surgical safety checklist: a mixed-methods longitudinal evaluation following a nationwide blended educational implementation strategy in Madagascar.使用世界卫生组织手术安全核对表的可持续性:马达加斯加全国混合式教育实施策略后的混合方法纵向评估。
BMJ Glob Health. 2018 Dec 20;3(6):e001104. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2018-001104. eCollection 2018.
4
Examining reliability of WHOBARS: a tool to measure the quality of administration of WHO surgical safety checklist using generalisability theory with surgical teams from three New Zealand hospitals.考察 WHOBARS 的可靠性:使用概化理论,对来自新西兰 3 家医院的外科团队,衡量世卫组织手术安全检查表管理质量的工具。
BMJ Open. 2019 Jan 9;9(1):e022625. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022625.
5
Evaluation of a countrywide implementation of the world health organisation surgical safety checklist in Madagascar.对世界卫生组织手术安全核对表在马达加斯加全国范围内实施情况的评估。
PLoS One. 2018 Feb 5;13(2):e0191849. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0191849. eCollection 2018.
6
Sustainability and long-term effectiveness of the WHO surgical safety checklist combined with pulse oximetry in a resource-limited setting: two-year update from Moldova.在资源有限的环境下,世界卫生组织手术安全检查表与脉搏血氧饱和度监测相结合的可持续性和长期效果:来自摩尔多瓦的两年更新。
JAMA Surg. 2015 May;150(5):473-9. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2014.3848.
7
Mortality Trends After a Voluntary Checklist-based Surgical Safety Collaborative.自愿基于清单的手术安全协作后的死亡率趋势。
Ann Surg. 2017 Dec;266(6):923-929. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002249.
8
Improving the quality of administration of the Surgical Safety Checklist: a mixed methods study in New Zealand hospitals.提高手术安全检查表管理质量:新西兰医院的混合方法研究。
BMJ Open. 2018 Dec 16;8(12):e022882. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022882.
9
Interval follow up of a 4-day pilot program to implement the WHO surgical safety checklist at a Congolese hospital.对在一家刚果医院实施世界卫生组织手术安全核对表的为期4天的试点项目进行的随访。
Global Health. 2017 Jun 29;13(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s12992-017-0266-0.
10
Implementation of the Surgical Safety Checklist in South Carolina Hospitals Is Associated with Improvement in Perceived Perioperative Safety.南卡罗来纳州医院实施手术安全检查表与改善围手术期安全性的感知有关。
J Am Coll Surg. 2016 May;222(5):725-736.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2015.12.052. Epub 2016 Jan 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Protocol for implementation of intraoperative adverse event recording during WHO checklist sign-out.世界卫生组织手术核查表签出时术中不良事件记录的实施规程。
BMJ Open Qual. 2025 May 30;14(2):e003286. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2024-003286.
2
Systematic recording and discussion of intraoperative adverse events using ClassIntra: results of a qualitative context analysis before implementation.使用ClassIntra对术中不良事件进行系统记录和讨论:实施前的定性情境分析结果
Int J Qual Health Care. 2025 Apr 11;37(1). doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzaf023.
3
Assessing use of the WHO surgical safety checklist for pediatric surgery in Senegal: A nationwide survey.

本文引用的文献

1
Access to safe surgery.获得安全手术的机会。
BMJ Glob Health. 2018 May 21;2(Suppl 4):e000908. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2018-000908. eCollection 2017.
2
Ten years of the Surgical Safety Checklist.手术安全核对表十年。
Br J Surg. 2018 Jul;105(8):927-929. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10907. Epub 2018 May 17.
3
Surgical site infection after gastrointestinal surgery in high-income, middle-income, and low-income countries: a prospective, international, multicentre cohort study.高收入、中等收入和低收入国家胃肠道手术后手术部位感染:一项前瞻性、国际、多中心队列研究。
评估塞内加尔儿科手术中世界卫生组织手术安全核对表的使用情况:一项全国性调查。
Glob J Qual Saf Healthc. 2024 Oct 22;8(1):23-26. doi: 10.36401/JQSH-24-31. eCollection 2025 Feb.
4
Implementation of an electronic health record system during global surgical outreach: A prospective evaluation of success and sustainability.在全球外展手术期间实施电子健康记录系统:对成功和可持续性的前瞻性评估。
World J Surg. 2024 Jul;48(7):1593-1601. doi: 10.1002/wjs.12201. Epub 2024 May 10.
5
Evaluating the uptake and effect of Surgical Safety Checklist implementation in a rural hospital, Neno District, Malawi.评估《 Malawi 内诺区农村医院 Surgical Safety Checklist 实施情况及效果》。
BMJ Open Qual. 2023 Nov;12(4). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002426.
6
Pulse oximetry training landscape for healthcare workers in low- and middle-income countries: A scoping review.脉搏血氧仪培训在中低收入国家医疗工作者中的现状:范围综述。
J Glob Health. 2023 Sep 22;13:04074. doi: 10.7189/jogh.13.04074.
7
Prospective application of theoretical implementation frameworks to improve health care in hospitals - a systematic review.理论实施框架在改善医院医疗中的预期应用——系统评价。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Jun 9;23(1):607. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09609-y.
8
Multifaceted implementation and sustainability of a protocol for prehospital anaesthesia: a retrospective analysis of 2115 patients from helicopter emergency medical services.多方面实施和维持院前麻醉协议:直升机紧急医疗服务 2115 例患者的回顾性分析。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2023 Apr 30;31(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s13049-023-01086-w.
9
Implementing point-of-care medical information systems into trauma and general surgeon practice in a middle-income country: a qualitative study utilizing the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research.在一个中等收入国家的创伤和普通外科医生实践中实施即时医疗信息系统:一项利用实施研究综合框架的定性研究。
Implement Sci Commun. 2023 Apr 6;4(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s43058-023-00397-4.
10
Scaling up of safety and quality improvement interventions in perioperative care: a systematic scoping review of implementation strategies and effectiveness.手术期护理中安全和质量改进干预措施的扩大化:实施策略和效果的系统范围界定综述。
BMJ Glob Health. 2022 Oct;7(10). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2022-010649.
Lancet Infect Dis. 2018 May;18(5):516-525. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(18)30101-4. Epub 2018 Feb 13.
4
Evaluation of a countrywide implementation of the world health organisation surgical safety checklist in Madagascar.对世界卫生组织手术安全核对表在马达加斯加全国范围内实施情况的评估。
PLoS One. 2018 Feb 5;13(2):e0191849. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0191849. eCollection 2018.
5
Perioperative patient outcomes in the African Surgical Outcomes Study: a 7-day prospective observational cohort study.非洲手术结局研究中的围手术期患者结局:一项 7 天前瞻性观察性队列研究。
Lancet. 2018 Apr 21;391(10130):1589-1598. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30001-1. Epub 2018 Jan 3.
6
Effect of removing the barrier of transportation costs on surgical utilisation in Guinea, Madagascar and the Republic of Congo.消除运输成本障碍对几内亚、马达加斯加和刚果共和国外科手术利用率的影响。
BMJ Glob Health. 2017 Sep 26;2(Suppl 4):e000434. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2017-000434. eCollection 2017.
7
Overcoming challenges in implementing the WHO Surgical Safety Checklist: lessons learnt from using a checklist training course to facilitate rapid scale up in Madagascar.应对实施世界卫生组织手术安全核对表过程中的挑战:从利用核对表培训课程促进马达加斯加快速推广中汲取的经验教训
BMJ Glob Health. 2017 Sep 29;2(Suppl 4):e000430. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2017-000430. eCollection 2017.
8
Using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research to implement and evaluate national surgical planning.运用实施研究综合框架来实施和评估国家外科手术规划。
BMJ Glob Health. 2017 Jul 13;2(2):e000269. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2016-000269. eCollection 2017.
9
Mortality Trends After a Voluntary Checklist-based Surgical Safety Collaborative.自愿基于清单的手术安全协作后的死亡率趋势。
Ann Surg. 2017 Dec;266(6):923-929. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002249.
10
Causal Analysis of World Health Organization's Surgical Safety Checklist Implementation Quality and Impact on Care Processes and Patient Outcomes: Secondary Analysis From a Large Stepped Wedge Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial in Norway.世界卫生组织手术安全清单实施质量及其对护理过程和患者结局影响的因果分析:挪威一项大型梯次楔形集群随机对照试验的二次分析。
Ann Surg. 2019 Feb;269(2):283-290. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002584.