• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用世界卫生组织手术安全核对表的可持续性:马达加斯加全国混合式教育实施策略后的混合方法纵向评估。

Sustainability of using the WHO surgical safety checklist: a mixed-methods longitudinal evaluation following a nationwide blended educational implementation strategy in Madagascar.

作者信息

White Michelle C, Randall Kirsten, Ravelojaona Vaonandianina A, Andriamanjato Hery H, Andean Vanessa, Callahan James, Shrime Mark G, Russ Stephanie, Leather Andrew J M, Sevdalis Nick

机构信息

Centre for Global Health and Health Partnerships, King's College London, London, UK.

Department of Medical Capcity Building, Mercy Ships Africa Bureau, Cotonou, Benin.

出版信息

BMJ Glob Health. 2018 Dec 20;3(6):e001104. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2018-001104. eCollection 2018.

DOI:10.1136/bmjgh-2018-001104
PMID:30622746
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6307586/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The WHO Surgical Safety Checklist reduces postoperative complications by up to 50% with the biggest gains in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs). However in LMICs, checklist use is sporadic and widespread implementation has hitherto been unsuccessful. In 2015/2016, we partnered with the Madagascar Ministry of Health to undertake nationwide implementation of the checklist. We report a longitudinal evaluation of checklist use at 12-18 months postimplementation.

METHODS

Hospitals were identified from the original cohort using purposive sampling. Using a concurrent triangulation mixed-methods design, the primary outcome was self-reported checklist use. Secondary outcomes included use of basic safety processes, assessment of team behaviour, predictors of checklist use, impact on individuals and organisational culture and identification of barriers. Data were collected during 1-day hospital visits using validated questionnaires, WHO Behaviourally Adjusted Rating Scale (WHOBARS) assessment tool and focus groups and analysed using descriptive statistics, multivariate linear regression and thematic analysis.

RESULTS

175 individuals from 14 hospitals participated. 74% reported sustained checklist use after 15 months. Mean WHOBARS scores were high, indicating good team engagement. Sustained checklist use was associated with an improved overall understanding of patient safety but not with WHOBARS, hospital size or surgical volume. 87% reported improved understanding of patient safety and 83% increased job satisfaction. Thematic analysis identified improvements in hospital culture (teamwork and communication, preparation and organisation, trust and confidence) and hospital practice (pulse oximetry, timing of antibiotic prophylaxis, introduction of a surgical count). Lack of time in an emergency and obstructive leadership were the greatest implementation barriers.

CONCLUSION

74% of participants reported sustained checklist use 12-18 months following nationwide implementation in Madagascar, with associated improvements in job satisfaction, culture and compliance with safety procedures. Further work is required to examine this implementation model in other countries.

摘要

背景

世界卫生组织手术安全核对表可将术后并发症减少多达50%,在低收入和中等收入国家(LMICs)成效最为显著。然而在LMICs,核对表的使用并不稳定,迄今为止广泛实施均未成功。2015/2016年,我们与马达加斯加卫生部合作在全国范围内实施核对表。我们报告了实施后12至18个月核对表使用情况的纵向评估。

方法

采用目的抽样法从原始队列中确定医院。使用并行三角测量混合方法设计,主要结果是自我报告的核对表使用情况。次要结果包括基本安全流程的使用、团队行为评估、核对表使用的预测因素、对个人和组织文化的影响以及障碍识别。在为期1天的医院访视期间,使用经过验证的问卷、世界卫生组织行为调整评分量表(WHOBARS)评估工具和焦点小组收集数据,并使用描述性统计、多元线性回归和主题分析进行分析。

结果

来自14家医院的175人参与。74%的人报告在15个月后持续使用核对表。WHOBARS平均得分较高,表明团队参与度良好。持续使用核对表与对患者安全的总体理解改善相关,但与WHOBARS、医院规模或手术量无关。87%的人报告对患者安全的理解有所改善,83%的人工作满意度提高。主题分析确定了医院文化(团队合作与沟通、准备与组织、信任与信心)和医院实践(脉搏血氧饱和度测定、抗生素预防时机、引入手术清点)方面的改善。紧急情况下时间不足和领导阻碍是最大的实施障碍。

结论

74%的参与者报告在马达加斯加全国实施后12至18个月持续使用核对表,同时工作满意度、文化和安全程序合规性也有相关改善。需要进一步开展工作以在其他国家检验这种实施模式。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c2f/6307586/78ce49be6a19/bmjgh-2018-001104f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c2f/6307586/78ce49be6a19/bmjgh-2018-001104f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c2f/6307586/78ce49be6a19/bmjgh-2018-001104f01.jpg

相似文献

1
Sustainability of using the WHO surgical safety checklist: a mixed-methods longitudinal evaluation following a nationwide blended educational implementation strategy in Madagascar.使用世界卫生组织手术安全核对表的可持续性:马达加斯加全国混合式教育实施策略后的混合方法纵向评估。
BMJ Glob Health. 2018 Dec 20;3(6):e001104. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2018-001104. eCollection 2018.
2
Evaluation of a countrywide implementation of the world health organisation surgical safety checklist in Madagascar.对世界卫生组织手术安全核对表在马达加斯加全国范围内实施情况的评估。
PLoS One. 2018 Feb 5;13(2):e0191849. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0191849. eCollection 2018.
3
Implementation and evaluation of nationwide scale-up of the Surgical Safety Checklist.实施和评估全国范围内的手术安全检查表的推广。
Br J Surg. 2019 Jan;106(2):e91-e102. doi: 10.1002/bjs.11034.
4
Using the Knowledge to Action Framework to Describe a Nationwide Implementation of the WHO Surgical Safety Checklist in Cameroon.运用知识转化行动框架描述在喀麦隆全国范围内实施世界卫生组织手术安全核对表。
Anesth Analg. 2020 May;130(5):1425-1434. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000004586.
5
Interval follow up of a 4-day pilot program to implement the WHO surgical safety checklist at a Congolese hospital.对在一家刚果医院实施世界卫生组织手术安全核对表的为期4天的试点项目进行的随访。
Global Health. 2017 Jun 29;13(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s12992-017-0266-0.
6
Implementation of World Health Organization behaviorally anchored rating scale and checklist utilization: promising results for LMICs.世界卫生组织行为锚定评级量表及清单的应用:对低收入和中等收入国家的良好成效
Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 Jul 24;10:1204213. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1204213. eCollection 2023.
7
Improving the quality of administration of the Surgical Safety Checklist: a mixed methods study in New Zealand hospitals.提高手术安全检查表管理质量:新西兰医院的混合方法研究。
BMJ Open. 2018 Dec 16;8(12):e022882. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022882.
8
Sustainability and long-term effectiveness of the WHO surgical safety checklist combined with pulse oximetry in a resource-limited setting: two-year update from Moldova.在资源有限的环境下,世界卫生组织手术安全检查表与脉搏血氧饱和度监测相结合的可持续性和长期效果:来自摩尔多瓦的两年更新。
JAMA Surg. 2015 May;150(5):473-9. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2014.3848.
9
Overcoming challenges in implementing the WHO Surgical Safety Checklist: lessons learnt from using a checklist training course to facilitate rapid scale up in Madagascar.应对实施世界卫生组织手术安全核对表过程中的挑战:从利用核对表培训课程促进马达加斯加快速推广中汲取的经验教训
BMJ Glob Health. 2017 Sep 29;2(Suppl 4):e000430. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2017-000430. eCollection 2017.
10
Examining reliability of WHOBARS: a tool to measure the quality of administration of WHO surgical safety checklist using generalisability theory with surgical teams from three New Zealand hospitals.考察 WHOBARS 的可靠性:使用概化理论,对来自新西兰 3 家医院的外科团队,衡量世卫组织手术安全检查表管理质量的工具。
BMJ Open. 2019 Jan 9;9(1):e022625. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022625.

引用本文的文献

1
Barriers and facilitators for implementing WHO's Surgical Safety Checklist in a publicly funded hospital: a qualitative study from a tertiary-level public hospital in Croatia.在一家公立医院实施世界卫生组织手术安全核对表的障碍与促进因素:来自克罗地亚一家三级公立医院的定性研究
BMJ Open. 2025 Jun 30;15(6):e095155. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-095155.
2
Implementation of the WHO surgical safety checklist in resource-limited Somalia: a new standard in surgical safety.在资源有限的索马里实施世界卫生组织手术安全核对表:手术安全的新标准
Patient Saf Surg. 2024 Oct 14;18(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s13037-024-00410-2.
3
The creation of a pediatric surgical checklist for adult providers.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluation of a countrywide implementation of the world health organisation surgical safety checklist in Madagascar.对世界卫生组织手术安全核对表在马达加斯加全国范围内实施情况的评估。
PLoS One. 2018 Feb 5;13(2):e0191849. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0191849. eCollection 2018.
2
Overcoming challenges in implementing the WHO Surgical Safety Checklist: lessons learnt from using a checklist training course to facilitate rapid scale up in Madagascar.应对实施世界卫生组织手术安全核对表过程中的挑战:从利用核对表培训课程促进马达加斯加快速推广中汲取的经验教训
BMJ Glob Health. 2017 Sep 29;2(Suppl 4):e000430. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2017-000430. eCollection 2017.
3
为成人医护人员创建小儿外科技能检查表。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Sep 5;24(1):1029. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11405-1.
4
Implementation of an electronic health record system during global surgical outreach: A prospective evaluation of success and sustainability.在全球外展手术期间实施电子健康记录系统:对成功和可持续性的前瞻性评估。
World J Surg. 2024 Jul;48(7):1593-1601. doi: 10.1002/wjs.12201. Epub 2024 May 10.
5
Surgical counting interruptions in operating rooms.手术室中的手术物品清点中断情况。
BMC Nurs. 2024 Apr 10;23(1):241. doi: 10.1186/s12912-024-01912-1.
6
Improving the management of open tibia fractures, Malawi.改善开放性胫骨骨折的管理,马拉维。
Bull World Health Organ. 2024 Apr 1;102(4):255-264. doi: 10.2471/BLT.23.290755. Epub 2024 Feb 29.
7
Make a difference: implementation, quality and effectiveness of the WHO Surgical Safety Checklist-a narrative review.发挥作用:世界卫生组织手术安全核对表的实施、质量与效果——一项叙述性综述
J Thorac Dis. 2023 Oct 31;15(10):5723-5735. doi: 10.21037/jtd-22-1807. Epub 2023 Sep 15.
8
Pulse oximetry training landscape for healthcare workers in low- and middle-income countries: A scoping review.脉搏血氧仪培训在中低收入国家医疗工作者中的现状:范围综述。
J Glob Health. 2023 Sep 22;13:04074. doi: 10.7189/jogh.13.04074.
9
Addressing knowledge gaps in Surgical Safety Checklist use: statistical process control analysis of a surgical quality improvement programme in Ethiopia.解决手术安全检查表使用中的知识差距:埃塞俄比亚外科质量改进计划的统计过程控制分析。
Br J Surg. 2023 Oct 10;110(11):1511-1517. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znad234.
10
Bridging the know-do gap in low-income surgical environments: Creating contextually appropriate training videos to promote safer surgery in Ethiopia.弥合低收入手术环境中的知行差距:制作因地制宜的培训视频以促进埃塞俄比亚的手术安全
Surg Open Sci. 2022 Nov 7;11:40-44. doi: 10.1016/j.sopen.2022.10.005. eCollection 2023 Jan.
Causal Analysis of World Health Organization's Surgical Safety Checklist Implementation Quality and Impact on Care Processes and Patient Outcomes: Secondary Analysis From a Large Stepped Wedge Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial in Norway.
世界卫生组织手术安全清单实施质量及其对护理过程和患者结局影响的因果分析:挪威一项大型梯次楔形集群随机对照试验的二次分析。
Ann Surg. 2019 Feb;269(2):283-290. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002584.
4
Clinical Outcome, Social Impact and Patient Expectation: a Purposive Sampling Pilot Evaluation of Patients in Benin Seven Years After Surgery.临床结果、社会影响和患者期望:对贝宁患者术后七年的一项立意抽样试点评估
World J Surg. 2018 May;42(5):1254-1261. doi: 10.1007/s00268-017-4296-9.
5
An Observational Assessment of Anesthesia Capacity in Madagascar as a Prerequisite to the Development of a National Surgical Plan.马达加斯加麻醉能力的观察性评估:制定国家外科手术计划的前提条件
Anesth Analg. 2017 Jun;124(6):2001-2007. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002049.
6
Evaluation of Patient Satisfaction, Impact and Disability-Free Survival After a Surgical Mission in Madagascar: A Pilot Survey.马达加斯加外科手术任务后患者满意度、影响及无残疾生存情况评估:一项试点调查
World J Surg. 2017 Feb;41(2):364-369. doi: 10.1007/s00268-016-3745-1.
7
Working towards safer surgery in Africa; a survey of utilization of the WHO safe surgical checklist at the main referral hospitals in East Africa.致力于在非洲实现更安全的手术;对东非主要转诊医院使用世界卫生组织安全手术检查表的情况进行的一项调查。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2016 Aug 11;16(1):60. doi: 10.1186/s12871-016-0228-8.
8
Reducing perioperative harm in New Zealand: the WHO Surgical Safety Checklist, briefings and debriefings, and venous thrombembolism prophylaxis.减少新西兰围手术期伤害:世界卫生组织手术安全核对表、术前简报和术后汇报以及静脉血栓栓塞预防
N Z Med J. 2015 Oct 30;128(1424):54-67.
9
A behaviourally anchored rating scale for evaluating the use of the WHO surgical safety checklist: development and initial evaluation of the WHOBARS.一种用于评估世界卫生组织手术安全核对表使用情况的行为锚定评级量表:世界卫生组织手术安全核对表使用情况行为锚定评级量表(WHOBARS)的开发与初步评估
BMJ Qual Saf. 2016 Oct;25(10):778-86. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004448. Epub 2015 Nov 20.
10
Implementation of the WHO Surgical Safety Checklist and surgical swab and instrument counts at a regional referral hospital in Uganda - a quality improvement project.在乌干达一家地区转诊医院实施世卫组织手术安全检查表和手术拭子与器械计数 - 一个质量改进项目。
Anaesthesia. 2015 Dec;70(12):1345-55. doi: 10.1111/anae.13226.