• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

灵活的患者参与模式:实现头颈部癌症的质量结果并制定研究议程。

Flexible model for patient engagement: Achieving quality outcomes and building a research agenda for head and neck cancer.

机构信息

Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan.

Department of Public Health Sciences, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan.

出版信息

Head Neck. 2019 Apr;41(4):1087-1093. doi: 10.1002/hed.25584. Epub 2019 Jan 8.

DOI:10.1002/hed.25584
PMID:30620439
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This article describes the benefits of patient-driven research in the field of head and neck oncology, reviews lessons learned from establishing partnerships with patients and caregivers, and serves as a model for further patient-driven research endeavors.

METHODS

Head and neck cancer survivors underwent training including that of effective communication and the basics of research methodology. They then drove the agendas for monthly meetings that included a multidisciplinary team of providers, facilitated by a physician champion (S.S.C.).

RESULTS

The advisors reported concrete areas for improvement of the clinical flow, including the formation of a dental oncology clinic and a post-treatment survivorship clinic. They also refined research topics of interest, such as treatment regret. The advisors have also driven efforts to increase public awareness and have participated in cancer symposiums and local presentations.

CONCLUSION

Patient-driven research improves the relevance and implementation of head and neck oncology research and clinical processes.

摘要

背景

本文介绍了患者驱动型研究在头颈肿瘤学领域的益处,回顾了与患者和护理人员建立伙伴关系所获得的经验教训,并为进一步开展患者驱动型研究提供了范例。

方法

头颈部癌症幸存者接受了培训,包括有效的沟通技巧和研究方法的基础知识。然后,他们主导每月的会议议程,这些会议包括由一名医生(S.S.C.)担任主持人的多学科提供者团队。

结果

顾问们报告了临床流程改进的具体领域,包括成立口腔肿瘤学诊所和治疗后生存者诊所。他们还改进了感兴趣的研究课题,如治疗后悔。顾问们还积极推动提高公众意识,并参与癌症研讨会和当地演讲。

结论

患者驱动型研究提高了头颈部肿瘤学研究和临床流程的相关性和实施效果。

相似文献

1
Flexible model for patient engagement: Achieving quality outcomes and building a research agenda for head and neck cancer.灵活的患者参与模式:实现头颈部癌症的质量结果并制定研究议程。
Head Neck. 2019 Apr;41(4):1087-1093. doi: 10.1002/hed.25584. Epub 2019 Jan 8.
2
Improving outcomes in veterans with oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma through implementation of a multidisciplinary clinic.通过设立多学科诊所改善口咽鳞状细胞癌退伍军人的治疗效果。
Head Neck. 2017 Jun;39(6):1106-1112. doi: 10.1002/hed.24721. Epub 2017 Mar 29.
3
Head and Neck Cancer Survivorship Care: A Review of the Current Guidelines and Remaining Unmet Needs.头颈部癌症生存者照护:当前指南的回顾与未满足的需求。
Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2018 Jul 9;19(8):44. doi: 10.1007/s11864-018-0554-9.
4
Evaluation of a survivorship needs assessment planning tool for head and neck cancer survivor-caregiver dyads.评估头颈部癌症患者-照顾者二人组生存需求评估规划工具。
J Cancer Surviv. 2019 Feb;13(1):117-129. doi: 10.1007/s11764-019-0732-1. Epub 2019 Jan 15.
5
Prevalence and nature of survivorship needs in patients with head and neck cancer.头颈癌患者生存需求的患病率及性质
Head Neck. 2016 Jul;38(7):1097-103. doi: 10.1002/hed.24411. Epub 2016 Feb 19.
6
Development of a survivorship needs assessment planning tool for head and neck cancer survivors and their caregivers: a preliminary study.为头颈癌幸存者及其护理者开发生存需求评估规划工具:一项初步研究。
J Cancer Surviv. 2017 Dec;11(6):822-832. doi: 10.1007/s11764-017-0621-4. Epub 2017 Jun 21.
7
Will the presence of the patient at multidisciplinary meetings influence the decision in head and neck oncology management?患者出席多学科会议会影响头颈肿瘤治疗的决策吗?
Acta Otolaryngol. 2018 Feb;138(2):185-189. doi: 10.1080/00016489.2017.1384059. Epub 2017 Oct 5.
8
Improving access and timeliness of care for veterans with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: A multidisciplinary team's approach.改善头颈鳞状细胞癌退伍军人获得医疗服务的机会和及时性:多学科团队的方法。
Laryngoscope. 2016 Mar;126(3):627-31. doi: 10.1002/lary.25528. Epub 2015 Aug 12.
9
Identification and management of late dysfunction in survivors of head and neck cancer: Implementation and outcomes of an interdisciplinary quality of life (IQOL) clinic.头颈部癌症幸存者晚期功能障碍的识别和管理:跨学科生活质量(IQOL)临床实践的实施和结果。
Head Neck. 2021 Jul;43(7):2124-2135. doi: 10.1002/hed.26681. Epub 2021 Mar 21.
10
A Story in Black and White: Radiologic Evaluation in the Multidisciplinary Setting.黑白之间的故事:多学科背景下的放射学评估
Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2017 Aug;50(4):709-716. doi: 10.1016/j.otc.2017.03.007. Epub 2017 May 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Roadmap to engagement: Bringing patient partners into cancer research and beyond.参与路线图:将患者合作伙伴纳入癌症研究及其他领域。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2023 Aug 2;7(1):e178. doi: 10.1017/cts.2023.602. eCollection 2023.
2
Towards conceptualizing patients as partners in health systems: a systematic review and descriptive synthesis.将患者概念化为卫生系统的合作伙伴:系统评价和描述性综合。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2023 Jan 25;21(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s12961-022-00954-8.
3
Bridging the Patient Engagement Gap in Research and Quality Improvement Utilizing the Henry Ford Flexible Engagement Model.
利用亨利·福特灵活参与模式弥合研究与质量改进中的患者参与差距。
J Patient Cent Res Rev. 2022 Jan 17;9(1):35-45. doi: 10.17294/2330-0698.1828. eCollection 2022 Winter.
4
Ethical considerations for engaging frail and seriously ill patients as partners in research: sub-analysis of a systematic review.将体弱和重症患者纳入研究伙伴的伦理考量:一项系统评价的子分析
Res Involv Engagem. 2021 Jan 31;7(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s40900-021-00254-5.
5
Partnering with frail or seriously ill patients in research: a systematic review.在研究中与体弱或重病患者合作:一项系统综述。
Res Involv Engagem. 2020 Sep 11;6:52. doi: 10.1186/s40900-020-00225-2. eCollection 2020.