Sterba K R, Zapka J, LaPelle N, Garris T K, Buchanan A, Scallion M, Day T
Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, 68 President Street MSC 955, Charleston, SC, 29425, USA.
Hollings Cancer Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
J Cancer Surviv. 2017 Dec;11(6):822-832. doi: 10.1007/s11764-017-0621-4. Epub 2017 Jun 21.
The purpose of this study was to characterize primary end-of-treatment challenges in head and neck cancer (HNC) to drive the development of a survivorship needs assessment planning (SNAP) tool and evaluate its acceptability and feasibility.
Using qualitative methods (focus groups, interviews), we identified physical, emotional, and social post-treatment challenges from the perspectives of survivors (N = 17), caregivers (N = 14), and healthcare providers (N = 14) and pretested the SNAP tool. After Advisory Board ratings and consensus, the tool was finalized.
Survivors, caregivers and clinicians consistently highlighted the importance of assessing symptoms and functional abilities (e.g., dry mouth, speech/swallowing difficulties, weight loss), health behaviors (e.g., smoking, alcohol), emotional concerns (e.g., depression, isolation, nutritional distress), and social challenges (e.g., support, finances). Caregivers were overwhelmed and intensely focused on survivors' nutrition and trach/feeding tube care while clinicians emphasized financial and access concerns. Most participants were enthusiastic about the tool and directed a flexible care plan design due to variability in dyad needs. Over 75% reported high comfort using and navigating questions on a tablet and were in strong agreement that the care plan would help families practically and emotionally. Coordination of survivorship visits with follow-up care was critical to address travel and time barriers. While survivors and clinicians recommended waiting 1-6 months after treatment, caregivers preferred earlier survivorship visits.
Results pinpointed optimal end-of-treatment domains for routine assessment and support the feasibility of implementing a SNAP tool in the clinic.
Capitalizing on technology to direct HNC survivorship care is promising.
本研究旨在描述头颈部癌(HNC)治疗结束时的主要挑战,以推动制定生存需求评估计划(SNAP)工具,并评估其可接受性和可行性。
我们采用定性方法(焦点小组、访谈),从幸存者(N = 17)、护理人员(N = 14)和医疗服务提供者(N = 14)的角度确定治疗后的身体、情感和社会挑战,并对SNAP工具进行预测试。经过咨询委员会的评分和共识,该工具最终确定。
幸存者、护理人员和临床医生一致强调评估症状和功能能力(如口干、言语/吞咽困难、体重减轻)、健康行为(如吸烟、饮酒)、情感问题(如抑郁、孤立、营养困扰)和社会挑战(如支持、经济状况)的重要性。护理人员不堪重负,高度关注幸存者的营养以及气管造口/饲管护理,而临床医生则强调经济和就医问题。大多数参与者对该工具表示热情,并因二元组需求的差异而倾向于灵活的护理计划设计。超过75%的人表示在平板电脑上使用和浏览问题时感到非常舒适,并且强烈同意护理计划将在实际和情感上帮助家庭。将生存随访与后续护理协调起来对于解决出行和时间障碍至关重要。虽然幸存者和临床医生建议在治疗后等待1 - 6个月,但护理人员更喜欢更早进行生存随访。
结果确定了常规评估的最佳治疗结束领域,并支持在诊所实施SNAP工具的可行性。
利用技术指导头颈部癌生存护理前景广阔。