• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

参与路线图:将患者合作伙伴纳入癌症研究及其他领域。

Roadmap to engagement: Bringing patient partners into cancer research and beyond.

作者信息

Kimminau Kim S, Jernigan Cheryl, Krebill Hope, Douglas Sara, Peltzer Jill, Hamilton-Reeves Jill, Chen Ronald C, Jensen Roy

机构信息

Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Missouri-Columbia, Columbia, MO, USA.

University of Kansas Cancer Center, University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, KS, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Transl Sci. 2023 Aug 2;7(1):e178. doi: 10.1017/cts.2023.602. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.1017/cts.2023.602
PMID:37654779
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10465315/
Abstract

The University of Kansas Cancer Center (KU Cancer Center) initiated an engagement program to leverage the lived experience of individuals and families with cancer. KU Cancer Center faculty, staff, and patient partners built an infrastructure to achieve a patient-designed, patient-led, and research-informed engagement program called Patient and Investigator Voices Organizing Together (PIVOT). This special communication offers an engagement roadmap that can be replicated, scaled, and adopted at other cancer centers and academic health systems. PIVOT demonstrates that collaboration among academic leaders, investigators, and people with a lived experience yields a patient-centered, vibrant environment that enriches the research enterprise.

摘要

堪萨斯大学癌症中心(KU癌症中心)启动了一项参与计划,以利用癌症患者及其家庭的实际经历。KU癌症中心的教职员工和患者合作伙伴建立了一个基础设施,以实现一个由患者设计、患者主导且基于研究的参与计划,称为“患者与研究者共同发声组织”(PIVOT)。这份特别的通讯提供了一份参与路线图,可在其他癌症中心和学术健康系统中复制、扩展和采用。PIVOT表明,学术领袖、研究者和有实际经历的人之间的合作产生了一个以患者为中心、充满活力的环境,丰富了研究事业。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/edc5/10465315/a20f3f1ffcf4/S2059866123006027_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/edc5/10465315/3ca379687526/S2059866123006027_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/edc5/10465315/a20f3f1ffcf4/S2059866123006027_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/edc5/10465315/3ca379687526/S2059866123006027_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/edc5/10465315/a20f3f1ffcf4/S2059866123006027_fig2.jpg

相似文献

1
Roadmap to engagement: Bringing patient partners into cancer research and beyond.参与路线图:将患者合作伙伴纳入癌症研究及其他领域。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2023 Aug 2;7(1):e178. doi: 10.1017/cts.2023.602. eCollection 2023.
2
Evolving partnerships: engagement methods in an established health services research team.不断发展的伙伴关系:一个成熟的卫生服务研究团队中的参与方法
Res Involv Engagem. 2021 Oct 9;7(1):71. doi: 10.1186/s40900-021-00314-w.
3
Valuing All Voices: refining a trauma-informed, intersectional and critical reflexive framework for patient engagement in health research using a qualitative descriptive approach.重视所有声音:运用定性描述方法完善一个用于患者参与健康研究的创伤知情、交叉性和批判性反思框架。
Res Involv Engagem. 2020 Jul 19;6:42. doi: 10.1186/s40900-020-00217-2. eCollection 2020.
4
Engagement of people with lived experience of dementia advisory group and cross-cutting program: reflections on the first year.让患有痴呆症的人参与咨询小组和跨部门项目:第一年的反思
Res Involv Engagem. 2022 Jun 25;8(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s40900-022-00359-5.
5
Building a culture of engagement at a research centre for childhood disability.在一家儿童残疾研究中心营造参与文化。
Res Involv Engagem. 2021 Nov 6;7(1):78. doi: 10.1186/s40900-021-00319-5.
6
Working together in health research: a mixed-methods patient engagement evaluation.健康研究中的合作:一项混合方法的患者参与度评估
Res Involv Engagem. 2023 Aug 1;9(1):62. doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00475-w.
7
The NCI All Ireland Cancer Conference.美国国家癌症研究所全爱尔兰癌症会议。
Oncologist. 1999;4(4):275-277.
8
Patient and researcher experiences of patient engagement in primary care health care research: A participatory qualitative study.患者和研究人员对初级保健医疗研究中患者参与的体验:一项参与式定性研究。
Health Expect. 2022 Oct;25(5):2365-2376. doi: 10.1111/hex.13542. Epub 2022 Jul 22.
9
The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.医院环境中患者与护士以患者为中心的沟通体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):76-87. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1072.
10
Co-learning commentary: a patient partner perspective in mental health care research.共同学习评论:心理健康护理研究中患者伙伴的视角
Res Involv Engagem. 2023 Apr 18;9(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00435-4.

引用本文的文献

1
The Impact of a Community Partner Research Training Program.社区伙伴研究培训项目的影响
J Cancer Educ. 2025 Aug 22. doi: 10.1007/s13187-025-02718-8.
2
Forging partnerships for health equity research: transformative capacity-building for community-academic teams.建立促进健康公平研究的伙伴关系:社区-学术团队的变革性能力建设。
Front Public Health. 2025 Jul 29;13:1617711. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1617711. eCollection 2025.
3
Sustained Community Involvement in Translational Research: Evaluating the Acceptability of a Multisession Community Engagement Studio Approach.

本文引用的文献

1
Understanding multi-stakeholder needs, preferences and expectations to define effective practices and processes of patient engagement in medicine development: A mixed-methods study.了解多方利益相关者的需求、偏好和期望,以定义药物研发中患者参与的有效实践和流程:一项混合方法研究。
Health Expect. 2021 Apr;24(2):601-616. doi: 10.1111/hex.13207. Epub 2021 Feb 17.
2
Patient empowerment through engagement in bladder cancer research.通过参与膀胱癌研究实现患者赋权。
Urol Oncol. 2021 Mar;39(3):193.e13-193.e19. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2020.07.015. Epub 2020 Aug 28.
3
Patient Assisted Intervention for Neuropathy: Comparison of Treatment in Real Life Situations (PAIN-CONTRoLS): Bayesian Adaptive Comparative Effectiveness Randomized Trial.
社区持续参与转化研究:评估多环节社区参与工作室方法的可接受性。
Clin Transl Sci. 2025 Aug;18(8):e70312. doi: 10.1111/cts.70312.
患者辅助性神经病变干预:现实生活情境中的治疗比较(PAIN-CONTRoLS):贝叶斯适应性比较有效性随机试验
JAMA Neurol. 2021 Jan 1;78(1):68-76. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2020.2590.
4
COMMUNI. (COMMUNIcation and Patient Engagement at Diagnosis of PAncreatic CAncer): Study Protocol.胰腺癌诊断时的沟通与患者参与(COMMUNI):研究方案
Front Med (Lausanne). 2020 Apr 30;7:134. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2020.00134. eCollection 2020.
5
A road map for the future: An exploration of attitudes, perceptions, and beliefs among African Americans to tailor health promotion of cancer-related genetic counseling and testing.未来之路:探索非裔美国人对癌症相关遗传咨询和检测的健康促进的态度、看法和信念,以便进行针对性调整。
J Genet Couns. 2020 Aug;29(4):518-529. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1277. Epub 2020 Apr 15.
6
Development and Psychometric Analysis of the Patient Preferences for Engagement Tool.患者参与工具偏好的开发与心理测量分析
Nurs Res. 2020 Jul/Aug;69(4):289-298. doi: 10.1097/NNR.0000000000000423.
7
A Critical Discussion of Patient Engagement in Research.关于患者参与研究的批判性讨论
J Patient Cent Res Rev. 2017 Jan 31;4(1):39-41. doi: 10.17294/2330-0698.1273. eCollection 2017 Winter.
8
Patient Engagement In Research: Early Findings From The Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute.患者参与研究:患者中心的结局研究所的初步发现。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2019 Mar;38(3):359-367. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2018.05067.
9
It's time for a change!: The appreciative inquiry/bootcamp translation to address disparities in the Latino community with autism spectrum disorders.是时候做出改变了!:运用欣赏式探询/训练营模式,解决拉丁裔群体自闭症谱系障碍中的差异问题。
Cultur Divers Ethnic Minor Psychol. 2019 Jan;25(1):113-122. doi: 10.1037/cdp0000242.
10
Flexible model for patient engagement: Achieving quality outcomes and building a research agenda for head and neck cancer.灵活的患者参与模式:实现头颈部癌症的质量结果并制定研究议程。
Head Neck. 2019 Apr;41(4):1087-1093. doi: 10.1002/hed.25584. Epub 2019 Jan 8.