Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2019 Jan;96:367-400. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2018.11.019.
Current theories of language comprehension posit that readers and listeners routinely try to predict the meaning but also the visual or sound form of upcoming words. Whereas most neuroimaging studies on word prediction focus on the N400 ERP or its magnetic equivalent, various studies claim that word form prediction manifests itself in 'early', pre-N400 brain responses (e.g., ELAN, M100, P130, N1, P2, N200/PMN, N250). Modulations of these components are often taken as evidence that word form prediction impacts early sensory processes (the sensory hypothesis) or, alternatively, the initial stages of word recognition before word meaning is integrated with sentence context (the recognition hypothesis). Here, I comprehensively review studies on sentence- or discourse-level language comprehension that report such effects of prediction on early brain responses. I conclude that the reported evidence for the sensory hypothesis or word recognition hypothesis is weak and inconsistent, and highlight the urgent need for replication of previous findings. I discuss the implications and challenges to current theories of linguistic prediction and suggest avenues for future research.
目前的语言理解理论假设,读者和听众通常会尝试预测即将到来的单词的含义,但也会预测其视觉或听觉形式。虽然大多数关于单词预测的神经影像学研究都集中在 N400 ERP 或其磁场等效物上,但各种研究声称单词形式预测表现在“早期”、N400 前的大脑反应中(例如,ELAN、M100、P130、N1、P2、N200/PMN、N250)。这些成分的调制通常被视为单词形式预测影响早期感觉过程(感觉假设)的证据,或者替代地,在单词意义与句子语境结合之前影响单词识别的初始阶段(识别假设)。在这里,我全面回顾了报告句子或语篇水平语言理解中这种预测对早期大脑反应影响的研究。我得出的结论是,支持感觉假设或单词识别假设的证据是薄弱和不一致的,并强调迫切需要对以前的发现进行复制。我讨论了对当前语言预测理论的影响和挑战,并提出了未来研究的途径。