Blair Benjamin, Lowe James
Integrated Food Animal Management Systems, Department of Veterinary Clinical Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, USA.
Integrated Food Animal Management Systems, Department of Veterinary Clinical Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, USA; Lowe Consulting Ltd., Mahomet, Illinois, USA.
Prev Vet Med. 2019 Jan 1;162:107-109. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2018.11.005. Epub 2018 Nov 10.
Currently, little objective data is available describing the movements of cull sows and cull pigs through market channels or the association these movements with disease transmission risk. In this pilot study, we collected data to describe the scope and complexity of movements within the sow market channel. Premise ID tags where collected from all animals moving through a single slaughter plant over a one-week period in 2017. The premise ID's were each cross referenced with a public database to obtain origin location, and each tag was matched with its final collection point (FCP). This allowed terminal market, FCP, and point of origin of each sow to be determined. Approximately 90.4% of all sows moving to the plant during the one-week period were identified, indicating the utility of this data collection approach. Sows originated from premises in 21 states and Canada, and shipped from collection points in 7 states and Canada. Sows traveled a median straight-line distance of 1057 km, identifying the national scope of the sow market. Of the sows identified, 86% entered the plant from a final shipping point that was within 240 km to the source farm. The remaining 14% traveled more than 240 km from the premise of origin to the final point of shipment with 2.5% traveling distances 5 times greater between premise and FCP, then from FCP to the plant. From this it was hypothesized that not only is the sow market national in scope, but a significant number of sows are moved between multiple collection points prior to arriving at the terminal market. The combination of these two factors makes the sow network a likely candidate of pathogen transmission throughout the swine industry.
目前,关于淘汰母猪和淘汰猪在市场渠道中的流动情况,以及这些流动与疾病传播风险之间的关联,几乎没有客观数据。在这项试点研究中,我们收集数据以描述母猪市场渠道内流动的范围和复杂性。2017年,在一周时间内,从所有通过单个屠宰场的动物身上收集了场所识别标签。每个场所识别标签都与一个公共数据库进行交叉引用,以获取原产地信息,并且每个标签都与它的最终收集点(FCP)相匹配。这使得能够确定每头母猪的终端市场、最终收集点和原产地。在这一周内,流向该屠宰场的所有母猪中,约90.4%被识别出来,这表明了这种数据收集方法的有效性。母猪来自21个州和加拿大的养殖场,并从7个州和加拿大的收集点发货。母猪的直线距离中位数为1057公里,确定了母猪市场的全国范围。在被识别的母猪中,86%是从距离源农场240公里以内的最终发货点进入屠宰场的。其余14%的母猪从原产地到最终发货点的距离超过240公里,其中2.5%的母猪在养殖场和最终收集点之间的距离是从最终收集点到屠宰场距离的5倍。由此推测,不仅母猪市场范围覆盖全国,而且大量母猪在到达终端市场之前会在多个收集点之间流动。这两个因素的结合使得母猪网络很可能成为整个养猪行业病原体传播的一个途径。