• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

解决手术安全检查表使用中的知识差距:埃塞俄比亚外科质量改进计划的统计过程控制分析。

Addressing knowledge gaps in Surgical Safety Checklist use: statistical process control analysis of a surgical quality improvement programme in Ethiopia.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Boston Medical Center, Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

Department of Surgery, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California, USA.

出版信息

Br J Surg. 2023 Oct 10;110(11):1511-1517. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znad234.

DOI:10.1093/bjs/znad234
PMID:37551706
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10564401/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The WHO Surgical Safety Checklist reduces morbidity and mortality after surgery, but uptake remains challenging. In particular, low-income countries have been found to have lower rates of checklist use compared with high-income countries. The aim of this study was to determine the impact of educational workshops on Surgical Safety Checklist use implemented as part of a quality improvement initiative in five hospitals in Ethiopia that had variable experience with the Surgical Safety Checklist.

METHODS

From April 2019 to September 2020, each hospital implemented a 6-month surgical quality improvement programme, which included a Surgical Safety Checklist workshop. Statistical process control methodology was used to understand the variation in Surgical Safety Checklist compliance before and after workshops and a time-series analysis was performed using population-averaged generalized estimating equation Poisson regression. Checklist compliance was defined as correctly completing a sign in, timeout, and sign out. Incidence rate ratios of correct checklist use pre- and post-intervention were calculated and the change in mean weekly compliance was predicted.

RESULTS

Checklist compliance data were obtained from 2767 operations (1940 (70 per cent) pre-intervention and 827 (30 per cent) post-intervention). Mean weekly checklist compliance improved from 27.3 to 41.2 per cent (mean difference 13.9 per cent, P = 0.001; incidence rate ratio 1.51, P = 0.001). Hospitals with higher checklist compliance at baseline had the greatest overall improvements in compliance, more than 50 per cent over pre-intervention, while low-performing hospitals showed no improvement.

CONCLUSION

Surgical Safety Checklist workshops improved checklist compliance in hospitals with some experience with its use. Workshops had little effect in hospitals unfamiliar with the Surgical Safety Checklist, emphasizing the importance of multifactorial interventions and culture-change approaches. In receptive facilities, short workshops can accelerate behaviour change.

摘要

背景

世界卫生组织手术安全检查表可降低手术后的发病率和死亡率,但推广仍具有挑战性。特别是,与高收入国家相比,低收入国家使用检查表的比例较低。本研究旨在确定在埃塞俄比亚的五家医院实施的质量改进计划中,作为手术安全检查表使用的一部分,对教育研讨会的影响。这些医院对手术安全检查表的使用经验各不相同。

方法

从 2019 年 4 月至 2020 年 9 月,每家医院都实施了为期 6 个月的手术质量改进计划,其中包括手术安全检查表研讨会。使用统计过程控制方法来了解研讨会前后手术安全检查表的遵守情况的变化,并使用基于人群的广义估计方程泊松回归进行时间序列分析。检查表的遵守情况定义为正确完成签到、暂停和签出。计算干预前后正确使用检查表的发生率比,并预测平均每周遵守率的变化。

结果

从 2767 例手术中获得了检查表遵守数据(1940 例(70%)为干预前,827 例(30%)为干预后)。每周检查表的平均遵守率从 27.3%提高到 41.2%(平均差异 13.9%,P=0.001;发病率比 1.51,P=0.001)。基线检查表遵守率较高的医院总体遵守率提高幅度最大,超过干预前的 50%,而表现不佳的医院则没有提高。

结论

手术安全检查表研讨会提高了有一定使用经验的医院的检查表遵守率。对于不熟悉手术安全检查表的医院,研讨会效果甚微,这强调了多因素干预和文化变革方法的重要性。在易于接受的医院,简短的研讨会可以加速行为改变。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/91bc/10564401/70e5d00be42c/znad234f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/91bc/10564401/8c65e07c5edd/znad234f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/91bc/10564401/cbbd3500b08d/znad234f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/91bc/10564401/70e5d00be42c/znad234f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/91bc/10564401/8c65e07c5edd/znad234f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/91bc/10564401/cbbd3500b08d/znad234f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/91bc/10564401/70e5d00be42c/znad234f3.jpg

相似文献

1
Addressing knowledge gaps in Surgical Safety Checklist use: statistical process control analysis of a surgical quality improvement programme in Ethiopia.解决手术安全检查表使用中的知识差距:埃塞俄比亚外科质量改进计划的统计过程控制分析。
Br J Surg. 2023 Oct 10;110(11):1511-1517. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znad234.
2
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
3
[Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data].[容量与健康结果:来自系统评价和意大利医院数据评估的证据]
Epidemiol Prev. 2013 Mar-Jun;37(2-3 Suppl 2):1-100.
4
Community wide interventions for increasing physical activity.全社区范围内增加身体活动的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jan 5;1(1):CD008366. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008366.pub3.
5
Interventions for preventing falls in older people in care facilities.护理机构中预防老年人跌倒的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Aug 20;8:CD016064. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD016064.
6
Nutritional interventions for survivors of childhood cancer.儿童癌症幸存者的营养干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Aug 22;2016(8):CD009678. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009678.pub2.
7
Interventions to improve antibiotic prescribing practices for hospital inpatients.改善医院住院患者抗生素处方行为的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 9;2(2):CD003543. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003543.pub4.
8
Continuing education meetings and workshops: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes.继续教育会议和研讨会:对专业实践和医疗保健结果的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 15;9(9):CD003030. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003030.pub3.
9
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.对紫杉醇、多西他赛、吉西他滨和长春瑞滨在非小细胞肺癌中的临床疗效和成本效益进行的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(32):1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta5320.
10
What is the value of routinely testing full blood count, electrolytes and urea, and pulmonary function tests before elective surgery in patients with no apparent clinical indication and in subgroups of patients with common comorbidities: a systematic review of the clinical and cost-effective literature.在没有明显临床指征的患者和常见合并症患者亚组中,在择期手术前常规检测全血细胞计数、电解质和尿素以及肺功能测试的价值:对临床和成本效益文献的系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2012 Dec;16(50):i-xvi, 1-159. doi: 10.3310/hta16500.

引用本文的文献

1
Global Scaling of a Surgical Infection Prevention Program to 5 Low-Resource Countries.将一个外科感染预防项目推广至5个资源匮乏国家的全球规模扩展。
JAMA Surg. 2025 Aug 13. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2025.2790.
2
Factors associated with successful implementation of Clean Cut: a perioperative surgical site infection prevention quality improvement programme-a cohort study of low-resource hospitals.与“精准开刀”成功实施相关的因素:一项围手术期手术部位感染预防质量改进计划——低资源医院的队列研究
BMJ Glob Health. 2025 Mar 3;10(3):e018049. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2024-018049.
3
A Perioperative Quality Improvement Program for Cesarean Delivery in Ethiopia: A Stepped-Wedge Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.

本文引用的文献

1
Compliance with the World Health Organization's surgical safety checklist and related postoperative outcomes: a nationwide survey among 172 health facilities in Ethiopia.对世界卫生组织手术安全核对表的依从性及相关术后结果:埃塞俄比亚172家医疗机构的全国性调查
Patient Saf Surg. 2022 Jun 10;16(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s13037-022-00329-6.
2
Sustainability of a Surgical Quality Improvement Program at Hospitals in Ethiopia.埃塞俄比亚医院外科质量改进计划的可持续性。
JAMA Surg. 2022 Jan 1;157(1):68-70. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2021.5569.
3
Clean Cut (adaptive, multimodal surgical infection prevention programme) for low-resource settings: a prospective quality improvement study.
围手术期质量改进计划在埃塞俄比亚剖宫产中的应用:一项阶梯式楔形集群随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Aug 1;7(8):e2428910. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.28910.
4
Beyond the Scalpel: A Tapestry of Surgical Safety, Precision, and Patient Prosperity.超越手术刀:手术安全、精准与患者福祉的交织图景。
Cureus. 2023 Dec 11;15(12):e50316. doi: 10.7759/cureus.50316. eCollection 2023 Dec.
5
Innovative Approaches to Safe Surgery: A Narrative Synthesis of Best Practices.安全手术的创新方法:最佳实践的叙述性综合
Cureus. 2023 Nov 30;15(11):e49723. doi: 10.7759/cureus.49723. eCollection 2023 Nov.
清洁切割(自适应、多模式手术感染预防方案)用于资源匮乏环境:一项前瞻性质量改进研究。
Br J Surg. 2021 Jun 22;108(6):727-734. doi: 10.1002/bjs.11997.
4
Variation in global uptake of the Surgical Safety Checklist.全球范围内外科安全检查表的采用情况存在差异。
Br J Surg. 2020 Jan;107(2):e151-e160. doi: 10.1002/bjs.11321.
5
Sustainability of using the WHO surgical safety checklist: a mixed-methods longitudinal evaluation following a nationwide blended educational implementation strategy in Madagascar.使用世界卫生组织手术安全核对表的可持续性:马达加斯加全国混合式教育实施策略后的混合方法纵向评估。
BMJ Glob Health. 2018 Dec 20;3(6):e001104. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2018-001104. eCollection 2018.
6
Scaling Safety: The South Carolina Surgical Safety Checklist Experience.规模安全:南卡罗来纳州手术安全清单经验。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2018 Nov;37(11):1779-1786. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2018.0717.
7
Ten years of the Surgical Safety Checklist.手术安全核对表十年。
Br J Surg. 2018 Jul;105(8):927-929. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10907. Epub 2018 May 17.
8
Evaluation of a countrywide implementation of the world health organisation surgical safety checklist in Madagascar.对世界卫生组织手术安全核对表在马达加斯加全国范围内实施情况的评估。
PLoS One. 2018 Feb 5;13(2):e0191849. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0191849. eCollection 2018.
9
Mortality Trends After a Voluntary Checklist-based Surgical Safety Collaborative.自愿基于清单的手术安全协作后的死亡率趋势。
Ann Surg. 2017 Dec;266(6):923-929. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002249.
10
Using the WHO Surgical Safety Checklist to Direct Perioperative Quality Improvement at a Surgical Hospital in Cambodia: The Importance of Objective Confirmation of Process Completion.在柬埔寨一家外科医院使用世界卫生组织手术安全核对表指导围手术期质量改进:客观确认流程完成的重要性
World J Surg. 2017 Dec;41(12):3012-3024. doi: 10.1007/s00268-017-4198-x.