Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, 1855 4th St., San Francisco, CA, 94158, USA.
Department of Pediatrics, Pediatric Rheumatology, Children's Hospital Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA.
Pediatr Radiol. 2019 Jun;49(7):933-940. doi: 10.1007/s00247-018-4323-5. Epub 2019 Jan 8.
Optimized MRI parameters can be leveraged to improve signal intensity, accelerate imaging acquisition and increase resolution. Higher-resolution imaging with a small field of view (FOV) has been proposed as standard practice for investigating sacroiliac (SI) joints, but the improvement in disease detection and characterization over pelvic imaging with large FOV has not been established.
The purpose of this study was to compare dedicated MR images of the SI joints with survey imaging (large-FOV pelvic MRI) for detecting sacroiliitis.
Fifty-eight pediatric patients suspected of having sacroiliitis underwent dedicated sacroiliac joint and survey pelvic imaging at the same imaging session. We independently evaluated the small- and large-FOV image data sets for presence or absence of sacroiliitis, e.g., bone marrow edema, erosions and synovitis. We used nonparametric statistical tests to compare lesion scores for severity of inflammation. We created test characteristics for the survey pelvic images (low-resolution images of the sacroiliac joints) using dedicated sacroiliac images (small-FOV, high-resolution images) as the gold standard.
Dedicated sacroiliac small-FOV MRI detected more sacroiliitis compared to survey pelvic imaging with large FOV (χ=6.125, P=0.013). Readers detected significantly more features of inflammation on small- compared to large-FOV images, e.g., erosions (P=0.039), synovitis (P=0.009), sclerosis (P=0.017) and osteitis (P=0.001). Test characteristics for pelvic large-FOV imaging were sensitivity=0.76, specificity=1.00, positive predictive value = 1.00 and negative predictive value = 0.75.
This study provides test characteristics for survey pelvic MRI with lower-resolution large-field-of-view images as a screening tool for detecting sacroiliitis. Pelvic screening studies with large FOV have lower sensitivity, and dedicated sacroiliac MRI with small FOV is superior in detecting sacroiliitis when compared to pelvic screening MRI.
优化的 MRI 参数可以提高信号强度、加快成像采集速度并提高分辨率。小视野(FOV)的高分辨率成像已被提议作为评估骶髂(SI)关节的标准实践,但在疾病检测和特征描述方面,与大 FOV 的骨盆成像相比是否有改善尚未确定。
本研究旨在比较专用的 SI 关节 MRI 与常规骨盆大 FOV MRI 对骶髂关节炎的检测效果。
58 例疑似患有骶髂关节炎的儿科患者在同一检查中进行了专用的骶髂关节和常规骨盆成像。我们分别评估了小和大 FOV 图像数据集是否存在骶髂关节炎,例如骨髓水肿、侵蚀和滑膜炎。我们使用非参数统计检验比较了炎症严重程度的病变评分。我们使用专用的骶髂关节小 FOV 图像(高分辨率图像)作为金标准,为常规骨盆图像(骶髂关节的低分辨率图像)创建了测试特征。
专用的骶髂小 FOV MRI 比常规骨盆大 FOV 成像检测到更多的骶髂关节炎(χ=6.125,P=0.013)。与大 FOV 图像相比,读者在小 FOV 图像上检测到更多的炎症特征,例如侵蚀(P=0.039)、滑膜炎(P=0.009)、硬化(P=0.017)和骨炎(P=0.001)。常规骨盆大 FOV 成像的测试特征为:敏感性=0.76、特异性=1.00、阳性预测值=1.00 和阴性预测值=0.75。
本研究提供了使用低分辨率大 FOV 常规骨盆成像作为筛查工具检测骶髂关节炎的测试特征。大 FOV 的骨盆筛查研究敏感性较低,与常规骨盆筛查 MRI 相比,小 FOV 的专用骶髂 MRI 在检测骶髂关节炎方面更具优势。