Suppr超能文献

aspiration:床旁吞咽评估和内镜检查的诊断贡献。

Aspiration: diagnostic contributions from bedside swallowing evaluation and endoscopy.

机构信息

Audiology Phoniatry Service, Infermi Hospital, AUSL Romagna, Rimini, Italy.

Audiology Service, Policlinico Modena, Italy.

出版信息

Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2018 Dec;38(6):511-516. doi: 10.14639/0392-100X-1967.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to identify which characteristics, collected by bedside swallowing evaluation (BSE) and fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES), are a risk or a protective factor for aspiration. This retrospective study included data on 1577 consecutive patients, collected by BSE and FEES. Bivariate analysis was performed to verify the association of each variable with aspiration (Chi-Square test). The variables associated with aspiration were entered into a multivariate logistic model to quantify this association. Several variables were significantly associated (p < 0.05) with aspiration; cooperation, sensation, laryngeal elevation and direct therapy were found to be protective factors against aspiration. The regression model identified the most variables related with aspiration, among which tracheotomy, material pooling and spillage. Patients able to perform dry swallows were 77% less likely to aspirate (protective factor). Several variables are involved in protection of airways during swallowing. Their interaction, in patients with swallowing disorders, offers the clinician the best means of interpreting BSE and FEES.

摘要

本研究旨在确定通过床边吞咽评估(BSE)和纤维内镜吞咽评估(FEES)收集的哪些特征是吸入的风险或保护因素。这项回顾性研究包括通过 BSE 和 FEES 收集的 1577 例连续患者的数据。进行了双变量分析以验证每个变量与吸入的关联(卡方检验)。将与吸入相关的变量纳入多变量逻辑回归模型以量化这种关联。有几个变量与吸入显著相关(p < 0.05);合作、感觉、喉抬高和直接治疗被认为是预防吸入的保护因素。回归模型确定了与吸入最相关的变量,其中包括气管切开术、物质积聚和溢出。能够进行干吞咽的患者发生吸入的可能性降低了 77%(保护因素)。在吞咽障碍患者中,有几个变量参与了气道的保护。它们之间的相互作用为临床医生提供了解释 BSE 和 FEES 的最佳手段。

相似文献

1
Aspiration: diagnostic contributions from bedside swallowing evaluation and endoscopy.
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2018 Dec;38(6):511-516. doi: 10.14639/0392-100X-1967.
2
Correlation Between Pharyngeal Residue and Aspiration in Fiber-Optic Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing: An Observational Study.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2019 Mar;100(3):488-494. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2018.05.028. Epub 2018 Jun 27.
6
The accuracy of the bedside swallowing evaluation for detecting aspiration in survivors of acute respiratory failure.
J Crit Care. 2017 Jun;39:143-148. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2017.02.013. Epub 2017 Feb 15.
9
Reliability of the penetration aspiration scale with flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing.
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2015 Jun;124(6):480-3. doi: 10.1177/0003489414566267. Epub 2015 Jan 13.
10
Neonatal swallowing assessment using fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES).
Pediatr Pulmonol. 2018 Apr;53(4):437-442. doi: 10.1002/ppul.23946. Epub 2018 Jan 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Age-defying swallowing.
Front Aging. 2025 Apr 7;6:1510257. doi: 10.3389/fragi.2025.1510257. eCollection 2025.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Efficacy of exercises to rehabilitate dysphagia: A critique of the literature.
Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2015 Jun;17(3):222-9. doi: 10.3109/17549507.2015.1024171. Epub 2015 Mar 31.
4
Oropharyngeal dysphagia: screening and assessment.
Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2013 Dec;46(6):989-1008. doi: 10.1016/j.otc.2013.08.004. Epub 2013 Oct 8.
5
Causes of dysphagia among different age groups: a systematic review of the literature.
Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2013 Dec;46(6):965-87. doi: 10.1016/j.otc.2013.08.008. Epub 2013 Oct 12.
6
Spontaneous swallowing frequency has potential to identify dysphagia in acute stroke.
Stroke. 2013 Dec;44(12):3452-7. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.003048. Epub 2013 Oct 22.
9
Pooling score: an endoscopic model for evaluating severity of dysphagia.
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2008 Jun;28(3):135-40.
10
Utility of clinical swallowing examination measures for detecting aspiration post-stroke.
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2005 Dec;48(6):1280-93. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2005/089).

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验