• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Aspiration: diagnostic contributions from bedside swallowing evaluation and endoscopy. aspiration:床旁吞咽评估和内镜检查的诊断贡献。
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2018 Dec;38(6):511-516. doi: 10.14639/0392-100X-1967.
2
Correlation Between Pharyngeal Residue and Aspiration in Fiber-Optic Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing: An Observational Study.纤维光学吞咽评估中咽残留与误吸的相关性:一项观察性研究。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2019 Mar;100(3):488-494. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2018.05.028. Epub 2018 Jun 27.
3
Aspiration in the Fiberoptic Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing Associated with an Increased Risk of Mortality in a Cohort of Patients Suspected of Oropharyngeal Dysphagia.纤维内镜吞咽评估中吸入与疑诊口咽吞咽障碍患者队列死亡率增加的相关性。
Dysphagia. 2020 Apr;35(2):369-377. doi: 10.1007/s00455-019-10036-7. Epub 2019 Jul 20.
4
Evaluation of the Whiteout During Fiberoptic Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing and Examination of Its Correlation with Pharyngeal Residue and Aspiration.评估光纤内镜吞咽检查中的“白关”现象及其与咽部残留物和吸入的相关性。
Dysphagia. 2024 Oct;39(5):816-824. doi: 10.1007/s00455-023-10663-1. Epub 2024 Feb 15.
5
Aspiration in children and adolescents with neurogenic dysphagia: comparison of clinical judgment and fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing.神经源性吞咽困难儿童和青少年的误吸:临床判断与纤维内镜吞咽评估的比较
Neuropediatrics. 2014 Dec;45(6):402-5. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1387814. Epub 2014 Oct 24.
6
The accuracy of the bedside swallowing evaluation for detecting aspiration in survivors of acute respiratory failure.床边吞咽评估对急性呼吸衰竭幸存者误吸检测的准确性。
J Crit Care. 2017 Jun;39:143-148. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2017.02.013. Epub 2017 Feb 15.
7
Using fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing to detect laryngeal penetration and aspiration in infants in the neonatal intensive care unit.使用纤维光学内镜吞咽评估来检测新生儿重症监护病房中婴儿的喉穿透和误吸。
J Perinatol. 2017 Apr;37(4):404-408. doi: 10.1038/jp.2016.239. Epub 2017 Jan 5.
8
Development of an Accurate Bedside Swallowing Evaluation Decision Tree Algorithm for Detecting Aspiration in Acute Respiratory Failure Survivors.开发一种准确的床边吞咽评估决策树算法,用于检测急性呼吸衰竭幸存者中的误吸。
Chest. 2020 Nov;158(5):1923-1933. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2020.07.051. Epub 2020 Jul 25.
9
Reliability of the penetration aspiration scale with flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing.吞咽功能的软性内镜评估中经皮穿刺抽吸量表的可靠性。
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2015 Jun;124(6):480-3. doi: 10.1177/0003489414566267. Epub 2015 Jan 13.
10
Neonatal swallowing assessment using fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES).使用纤维内镜吞咽功能评估(FEES)进行新生儿吞咽评估。
Pediatr Pulmonol. 2018 Apr;53(4):437-442. doi: 10.1002/ppul.23946. Epub 2018 Jan 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Age-defying swallowing.逆龄吞咽。
Front Aging. 2025 Apr 7;6:1510257. doi: 10.3389/fragi.2025.1510257. eCollection 2025.
2
Predictive Value of Cough Frequency in Addition to Aspiration Risk for Increased Risk of Pneumonia in Dysphagic Stroke Survivors: A Clinical Pilot Study.吞咽困难的中风幸存者中,咳嗽频率联合误吸风险对肺炎风险增加的预测价值:一项临床初步研究。
Brain Sci. 2021 Jun 25;11(7):847. doi: 10.3390/brainsci11070847.
3
White Paper by the European Society for Swallowing Disorders: Screening and Non-instrumental Assessment for Dysphagia in Adults.《欧洲吞咽障碍学会白皮书:成人吞咽障碍的筛查和非仪器评估》。
Dysphagia. 2022 Apr;37(2):333-349. doi: 10.1007/s00455-021-10283-7. Epub 2021 Mar 31.
4
Correlations between bedside and instrumental endoscopic parameters in determining severity of dysphagia: an integrated clinical evaluation of safety and efficiency.床边评估与器械内镜检查参数在确定吞咽困难严重程度方面的相关性:安全性与有效性的综合临床评估
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2020 Aug;40(4):277-281. doi: 10.14639/0392-100X-N0474.
5
Time as a factor during endoscopic assessment of swallowing: relevance in defining the score and severity of swallowing disorders.吞咽内镜评估过程中时间作为一个因素:对定义吞咽障碍评分及严重程度的相关性
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2019 Aug;39(4):244-249. doi: 10.14639/0392-100X-N0221.

本文引用的文献

1
Efficacy of exercises to rehabilitate dysphagia: A critique of the literature.吞咽困难康复训练的疗效:文献综述
Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2015 Jun;17(3):222-9. doi: 10.3109/17549507.2015.1024171. Epub 2015 Mar 31.
2
The Pooling-score (P-score): inter- and intra-rater reliability in endoscopic assessment of the severity of dysphagia.合并评分(P 评分):吞咽困难严重程度内镜评估中的评分者间和评分者内信度
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2014 Apr;34(2):105-10.
3
The Need for International Terminology and Definitions for Texture-Modified Foods and Thickened Liquids Used in Dysphagia Management: Foundations of a Global Initiative.吞咽困难管理中使用的质地改良食品和增稠液体的国际术语和定义的必要性:全球倡议的基础。
Curr Phys Med Rehabil Rep. 2013 Aug 24;1(4):280-291. doi: 10.1007/s40141-013-0024-z. eCollection 2013.
4
Oropharyngeal dysphagia: screening and assessment.口咽吞咽困难:筛查与评估
Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2013 Dec;46(6):989-1008. doi: 10.1016/j.otc.2013.08.004. Epub 2013 Oct 8.
5
Causes of dysphagia among different age groups: a systematic review of the literature.不同年龄组吞咽困难的病因:文献系统综述
Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2013 Dec;46(6):965-87. doi: 10.1016/j.otc.2013.08.008. Epub 2013 Oct 12.
6
Spontaneous swallowing frequency has potential to identify dysphagia in acute stroke.自主吞咽频率有可能识别急性脑卒中患者的吞咽困难。
Stroke. 2013 Dec;44(12):3452-7. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.003048. Epub 2013 Oct 22.
7
The relationship between residue and aspiration on the subsequent swallow: an application of the normalized residue ratio scale.残留与后续吞咽时误吸之间的关系:标准化残留比量表的应用。
Dysphagia. 2013 Dec;28(4):494-500. doi: 10.1007/s00455-013-9459-8. Epub 2013 Mar 5.
8
Prevalence of oropharyngeal dysphagia and impaired safety and efficacy of swallow in independently living older persons.独立生活的老年人中口咽吞咽困难的患病率以及吞咽安全性和有效性受损的情况。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2011 Jan;59(1):186-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2010.03227.x.
9
Pooling score: an endoscopic model for evaluating severity of dysphagia.合并评分:一种用于评估吞咽困难严重程度的内镜模型。
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2008 Jun;28(3):135-40.
10
Utility of clinical swallowing examination measures for detecting aspiration post-stroke.临床吞咽检查措施在检测中风后误吸方面的效用。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2005 Dec;48(6):1280-93. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2005/089).

aspiration:床旁吞咽评估和内镜检查的诊断贡献。

Aspiration: diagnostic contributions from bedside swallowing evaluation and endoscopy.

机构信息

Audiology Phoniatry Service, Infermi Hospital, AUSL Romagna, Rimini, Italy.

Audiology Service, Policlinico Modena, Italy.

出版信息

Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2018 Dec;38(6):511-516. doi: 10.14639/0392-100X-1967.

DOI:10.14639/0392-100X-1967
PMID:30623896
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6325649/
Abstract

The aim of this study was to identify which characteristics, collected by bedside swallowing evaluation (BSE) and fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES), are a risk or a protective factor for aspiration. This retrospective study included data on 1577 consecutive patients, collected by BSE and FEES. Bivariate analysis was performed to verify the association of each variable with aspiration (Chi-Square test). The variables associated with aspiration were entered into a multivariate logistic model to quantify this association. Several variables were significantly associated (p < 0.05) with aspiration; cooperation, sensation, laryngeal elevation and direct therapy were found to be protective factors against aspiration. The regression model identified the most variables related with aspiration, among which tracheotomy, material pooling and spillage. Patients able to perform dry swallows were 77% less likely to aspirate (protective factor). Several variables are involved in protection of airways during swallowing. Their interaction, in patients with swallowing disorders, offers the clinician the best means of interpreting BSE and FEES.

摘要

本研究旨在确定通过床边吞咽评估(BSE)和纤维内镜吞咽评估(FEES)收集的哪些特征是吸入的风险或保护因素。这项回顾性研究包括通过 BSE 和 FEES 收集的 1577 例连续患者的数据。进行了双变量分析以验证每个变量与吸入的关联(卡方检验)。将与吸入相关的变量纳入多变量逻辑回归模型以量化这种关联。有几个变量与吸入显著相关(p < 0.05);合作、感觉、喉抬高和直接治疗被认为是预防吸入的保护因素。回归模型确定了与吸入最相关的变量,其中包括气管切开术、物质积聚和溢出。能够进行干吞咽的患者发生吸入的可能性降低了 77%(保护因素)。在吞咽障碍患者中,有几个变量参与了气道的保护。它们之间的相互作用为临床医生提供了解释 BSE 和 FEES 的最佳手段。