• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

麦金托什喉镜和宾得AWS视频喉镜气管插管方法产生的效果及心血管反应的对比研究

A comparative study on the efficacy and cardiovascular response generated by macintosh and pentax-AWS video laryngoscopic endotracheal intubation methods.

作者信息

Cha Su Man, Kang Hyun, Baek Chong Wha, Park Jung Won, Jung Yong Hun

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, College of Medicine, Chung-Ang University, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Korean J Anesthesiol. 2009 Feb;56(2):146-150. doi: 10.4097/kjae.2009.56.2.146.

DOI:10.4097/kjae.2009.56.2.146
PMID:30625713
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Pentax-AWS is a newly developed rigid video laryngoscope. In comparison to the Macintosh laryngoscope, it offers a significantly improved laryngeal view and facilitates endotracheal intubation. The present study was performed to compare the general efficiency and the cardiovascular responses generated by Macintosh and Pentax-AWS systems during endotracheal intubation.

METHODS

This study included 120 patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status class 1 or 2 requiring tracheal intubation for elective surgery. All patients were randomly allocated into two groups: Pentax-AWS (group P) and Macintosh (group M). Induction of anesthesia was performed using fentanyl, thiopental and succinylcholine intravenously. Systolic, mean and diastolic blood pressure (SBP, MBP, DBP) and heart rate (HR) were recorded just prior to induction, 1, 3, and 5 minutes after intubation.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in SBP, MBP, DBP and HR between both groups. However, group P showed a higher POGO (Percentage of Glottic Opening) score than group M during endotracheal intubation.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of Pentax-AWS in endotracheal intubation did not increase hemodynamic changes compared to the use of Macintosh laryngoscope. Furthermore, Pentax-AWS offered an improved laryngeal view during endotracheal intubation.

摘要

背景

宾得AWS是一种新开发的硬质可视喉镜。与麦金托什喉镜相比,它能显著改善喉镜视野并便于气管插管。本研究旨在比较麦金托什喉镜和宾得AWS系统在气管插管过程中的总体效率及心血管反应。

方法

本研究纳入120例美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)身体状况分级为1或2级、需行择期手术气管插管的患者。所有患者随机分为两组:宾得AWS组(P组)和麦金托什组(M组)。静脉注射芬太尼、硫喷妥钠和琥珀酰胆碱进行麻醉诱导。在诱导前、插管后1、3和5分钟记录收缩压、平均动脉压、舒张压(SBP、MBP、DBP)和心率(HR)。

结果

两组间SBP、MBP、DBP和HR无显著差异。然而,在气管插管过程中,P组的声门开口百分比(POGO)评分高于M组。

结论

与使用麦金托什喉镜相比,在气管插管中使用宾得AWS不会增加血流动力学变化。此外,宾得AWS在气管插管过程中能提供更好的喉镜视野。

相似文献

1
A comparative study on the efficacy and cardiovascular response generated by macintosh and pentax-AWS video laryngoscopic endotracheal intubation methods.麦金托什喉镜和宾得AWS视频喉镜气管插管方法产生的效果及心血管反应的对比研究
Korean J Anesthesiol. 2009 Feb;56(2):146-150. doi: 10.4097/kjae.2009.56.2.146.
2
Macintosh laryngoscope vs. Pentax-AWS video laryngoscope: comparison of efficacy and cardiovascular responses to tracheal intubation in major burn patients.Macintosh 喉镜与 Pentax-AWS 视频喉镜:在大面积烧伤患者中气管插管的效果和心血管反应比较。
Korean J Anesthesiol. 2012 Feb;62(2):119-24. doi: 10.4097/kjae.2012.62.2.119. Epub 2012 Feb 20.
3
The Pentax airway scope versus the Macintosh laryngoscope: Comparison of hemodynamic responses and concentrations of plasma norepinephrine to tracheal intubation.宾得气道镜与麦克intosh 喉镜:气管插管时血流动力学反应和血浆去甲肾上腺素浓度的比较。
Korean J Anesthesiol. 2013 Apr;64(4):315-20. doi: 10.4097/kjae.2013.64.4.315. Epub 2013 Apr 22.
4
A randomized comparison between the Pentax AWS video laryngoscope and the Macintosh laryngoscope in morbidly obese patients.在病态肥胖患者中,Pentax AWS 视频喉镜与 Macintosh 喉镜的随机比较。
Anesth Analg. 2011 Nov;113(5):1082-7. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e31822cf47d. Epub 2011 Sep 14.
5
The Pentax-AWS((R)) rigid indirect video laryngoscope: clinical assessment of performance in 320 cases.宾得AWS(R)型硬质间接视频喉镜:320例临床性能评估
Anaesthesia. 2008 Jun;63(6):641-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2008.05452.x.
6
Utility of the Pentax-AWS without interruption of chest compression: comparison of the Macintosh laryngoscope with the Pentax-AWS in manikin model.无中断胸外按压使用 Pentax-AWS 的实用性:在人体模型中比较 Macintosh 喉镜和 Pentax-AWS
Resuscitation. 2010 Jan;81(1):69-73. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2009.09.031. Epub 2009 Nov 17.
7
Pentax-AWS, a new videolaryngoscope, is more effective than the Macintosh laryngoscope for tracheal intubation in patients with restricted neck movements: a randomized comparative study.一项随机对照研究表明,新型视频喉镜宾得AWS在颈部活动受限患者的气管插管中比麦金托什喉镜更有效。
Br J Anaesth. 2008 Apr;100(4):544-8. doi: 10.1093/bja/aen002. Epub 2008 Jan 31.
8
Tracheal intubation by non-anesthesia residents using the Pentax-AWS airway scope and Macintosh laryngoscope.非麻醉科住院医师使用宾得AWS气道镜和麦金托什喉镜进行气管插管。
J Clin Anesth. 2009 Jun;21(4):268-71. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2008.08.024. Epub 2009 Jun 6.
9
Comparison of the Pentax-AWS airway scope with the Macintosh laryngoscope for nasotracheal intubation: a randomized, prospective study.经鼻气管插管时与 Pentax-AWS 气道镜与 Macintosh 喉镜的比较:一项随机、前瞻性研究。
J Clin Anesth. 2012 Nov;24(7):561-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2012.04.007.
10
Tracheal intubation with the PENTAX-AWS (airway scope) reduces changes of hemodynamic responses and bispectral index scores compared with the Macintosh laryngoscope.与 Macintosh 喉镜相比,使用 PENTAX-AWS(气道镜)进行气管插管可减少血流动力学反应和双频谱指数评分的变化。
J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2009 Oct;21(4):292-6. doi: 10.1097/ANA.0b013e3181a9c6dc.

引用本文的文献

1
Videolaryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for adults undergoing tracheal intubation.视频喉镜与直接喉镜用于成人气管插管。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Apr 4;4(4):CD011136. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011136.pub3.
2
Macintosh laryngoscope vs. Pentax-AWS video laryngoscope: comparison of efficacy and cardiovascular responses to tracheal intubation in major burn patients.Macintosh 喉镜与 Pentax-AWS 视频喉镜:在大面积烧伤患者中气管插管的效果和心血管反应比较。
Korean J Anesthesiol. 2012 Feb;62(2):119-24. doi: 10.4097/kjae.2012.62.2.119. Epub 2012 Feb 20.