• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

宾得气道镜与麦克intosh 喉镜:气管插管时血流动力学反应和血浆去甲肾上腺素浓度的比较。

The Pentax airway scope versus the Macintosh laryngoscope: Comparison of hemodynamic responses and concentrations of plasma norepinephrine to tracheal intubation.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, School of Medicine, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Korean J Anesthesiol. 2013 Apr;64(4):315-20. doi: 10.4097/kjae.2013.64.4.315. Epub 2013 Apr 22.

DOI:10.4097/kjae.2013.64.4.315
PMID:23646240
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3640163/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Pentax Airway Scope (AWS) is a video laryngoscope designed to facilitate tracheal intubation with a high-resolution image. The Pentax AWS has been reported to cause less hemodynamic stress than the Macintosh laryngoscope. The aims of this study are to investigate the differences in hemodynamic responses and norepinephrine concentrations to tracheal intubation between procedures using he Pentax AWS and the Macintosh laryngoscope.

METHODS

Forty patients (American Society of Anesthesiologists class I-II, age range: 18-60 years) were randomly assigned to be intubated with either the Pentax AWS or the Macintosh laryngoscope while under general anesthesia. Routine monitoring, including invasive arterial blood pressure and bispectral index, were applied. Thiopental (4 mg/kg), fentanyl (1 µg/kg), midazolam (0.05 mg/kg), and rocuronium (0.6 mg/kg) were administered for anesthetic induction. Systolic, diastolic, and mean blood pressures and heart rates were recorded pre-intubation, immediately post-intubation (T0), and over the following 10 minutes at one minute intervals (T1, T2, T3, T4, T5…T10). Patient blood was sampled for norepinephrine concentrations pre-intubation (baseline) and post-intubation (T1). Evidence of sore throat was evaluated 30 min and 24 hr after extubation. Data were transformed to % basal and expressed as mean ± SD.

RESULTS

The systolic, diastolic, and mean blood pressure, and heart rate at T0 and T4 were significantly different between the two groups. There was no significant difference in plasma norepinephrine between the two groups. The difference in incidence of sore throat was not significant between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Pentax-AWS for tracheal intubation has greater hemodynamic stability than the Macintosh blade laryngoscope.

摘要

背景

Pentax Airway Scope(AWS)是一种视频喉镜,旨在提供高分辨率图像以方便气管插管。已有报道称,与 Macintosh 喉镜相比,Pentax AWS 引起的血流动力学应激更小。本研究旨在研究使用 Pentax AWS 和 Macintosh 喉镜进行气管插管时血流动力学反应和去甲肾上腺素浓度的差异。

方法

40 名患者(美国麻醉医师协会分级 I-II,年龄范围:18-60 岁)被随机分为使用 Pentax AWS 或 Macintosh 喉镜进行插管。应用常规监测,包括有创动脉血压和脑电双频指数。给予硫喷妥钠(4mg/kg)、芬太尼(1μg/kg)、咪达唑仑(0.05mg/kg)和罗库溴铵(0.6mg/kg)进行麻醉诱导。记录插管前(基础)、插管即刻(T0)以及随后 10 分钟内每 1 分钟(T1、T2、T3、T4、T5……T10)的收缩压、舒张压和平均血压以及心率。在插管前(基础)和插管后(T1)采集患者的血液样本以测量去甲肾上腺素浓度。在拔管后 30 分钟和 24 小时评估咽喉痛的证据。数据转换为%基础值并表示为平均值±标准差。

结果

两组患者的 T0 和 T4 时的收缩压、舒张压和平均血压以及心率均有显著差异。两组之间的血浆去甲肾上腺素浓度无显著差异。两组之间咽喉痛的发生率无显著差异。

结论

与 Macintosh 叶片喉镜相比,Pentax-AWS 用于气管插管具有更大的血流动力学稳定性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/954c/3640163/187f4be5bc7f/kjae-64-315-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/954c/3640163/70865f3f580d/kjae-64-315-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/954c/3640163/187f4be5bc7f/kjae-64-315-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/954c/3640163/70865f3f580d/kjae-64-315-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/954c/3640163/187f4be5bc7f/kjae-64-315-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
The Pentax airway scope versus the Macintosh laryngoscope: Comparison of hemodynamic responses and concentrations of plasma norepinephrine to tracheal intubation.宾得气道镜与麦克intosh 喉镜:气管插管时血流动力学反应和血浆去甲肾上腺素浓度的比较。
Korean J Anesthesiol. 2013 Apr;64(4):315-20. doi: 10.4097/kjae.2013.64.4.315. Epub 2013 Apr 22.
2
Tracheal intubation with the PENTAX-AWS (airway scope) reduces changes of hemodynamic responses and bispectral index scores compared with the Macintosh laryngoscope.与 Macintosh 喉镜相比,使用 PENTAX-AWS(气道镜)进行气管插管可减少血流动力学反应和双频谱指数评分的变化。
J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2009 Oct;21(4):292-6. doi: 10.1097/ANA.0b013e3181a9c6dc.
3
A comparative study on the efficacy and cardiovascular response generated by macintosh and pentax-AWS video laryngoscopic endotracheal intubation methods.麦金托什喉镜和宾得AWS视频喉镜气管插管方法产生的效果及心血管反应的对比研究
Korean J Anesthesiol. 2009 Feb;56(2):146-150. doi: 10.4097/kjae.2009.56.2.146.
4
Tracheal intubation by non-anesthesia residents using the Pentax-AWS airway scope and Macintosh laryngoscope.非麻醉科住院医师使用宾得AWS气道镜和麦金托什喉镜进行气管插管。
J Clin Anesth. 2009 Jun;21(4):268-71. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2008.08.024. Epub 2009 Jun 6.
5
A randomized comparison between the Pentax AWS video laryngoscope and the Macintosh laryngoscope in morbidly obese patients.在病态肥胖患者中,Pentax AWS 视频喉镜与 Macintosh 喉镜的随机比较。
Anesth Analg. 2011 Nov;113(5):1082-7. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e31822cf47d. Epub 2011 Sep 14.
6
Macintosh laryngoscope vs. Pentax-AWS video laryngoscope: comparison of efficacy and cardiovascular responses to tracheal intubation in major burn patients.Macintosh 喉镜与 Pentax-AWS 视频喉镜:在大面积烧伤患者中气管插管的效果和心血管反应比较。
Korean J Anesthesiol. 2012 Feb;62(2):119-24. doi: 10.4097/kjae.2012.62.2.119. Epub 2012 Feb 20.
7
Pentax-AWS, a new videolaryngoscope, is more effective than the Macintosh laryngoscope for tracheal intubation in patients with restricted neck movements: a randomized comparative study.一项随机对照研究表明,新型视频喉镜宾得AWS在颈部活动受限患者的气管插管中比麦金托什喉镜更有效。
Br J Anaesth. 2008 Apr;100(4):544-8. doi: 10.1093/bja/aen002. Epub 2008 Jan 31.
8
Comparison of results from novice and trained personnel using the Macintosh laryngoscope, Pentax AWS®, C-MAC™ and Bonfils intubation fibrescope: a manikin study.新手和训练有素的人员使用 Macintosh 喉镜、Pentax AWS®、C-MAC™ 和 Bonfils 插管纤维镜的结果比较:一项人体模型研究。
Singapore Med J. 2013 Feb;54(2):64-8.
9
Randomized comparison of the Pentax AirWay Scope and Macintosh laryngoscope for tracheal intubation in patients with obstructive sleep apnoea.随机比较 Pentax AirWay 喉镜和 Macintosh 喉镜在阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停患者中的气管插管。
Br J Anaesth. 2013 Oct;111(4):662-6. doi: 10.1093/bja/aet201. Epub 2013 Jun 9.
10
Comparison of the utility of the Pentax Airway Scope (AWS) with that of the conventional Macintosh laryngoscope during chest compression: is the AWS an easy-to-use device for a novice?在胸外按压期间,比较宾得气道镜(AWS)与传统麦金托什喉镜的效用:AWS对新手来说是一种易于使用的设备吗?
Acute Med Surg. 2014 Apr 23;1(3):163-169. doi: 10.1002/ams2.35. eCollection 2014 Jul.

引用本文的文献

1
Effects of GlideScope, Pentax Airway Scope, and Macintosh Blade on the incidence of postoperative sore throat: a cohort study of 9,881 patients.经 GlideScope、Pentax Airway Scope 和 Macintosh blade 处理后对术后咽喉痛发生率的影响:9881 例患者的队列研究。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2024 Nov 12;24(1):409. doi: 10.1186/s12871-024-02798-x.
2
Clinical Application of Ultrasound-Guided Internal Branch of Superior Laryngeal Nerve Block in Patients with Severe COPD Undergoing Awake Fibreoptic Nasotracheal Intubation: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.超声引导下咽神经内支阻滞在 COPD 患者清醒经鼻纤维支气管镜插管中的临床应用:一项随机对照临床试验。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2023 Apr 6;18:521-532. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S399513. eCollection 2023.
3

本文引用的文献

1
A randomized comparison between the Pentax AWS video laryngoscope and the Macintosh laryngoscope in morbidly obese patients.在病态肥胖患者中,Pentax AWS 视频喉镜与 Macintosh 喉镜的随机比较。
Anesth Analg. 2011 Nov;113(5):1082-7. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e31822cf47d. Epub 2011 Sep 14.
2
Comparison of video laryngoscopes with direct laryngoscopy for tracheal intubation: a meta-analysis of randomised trials.视频喉镜与直接喉镜用于气管插管的比较:随机试验的荟萃分析。
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2011 Nov;28(11):788-95. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e32834a34f3.
3
Tracheal intubation with the PENTAX-AWS (airway scope) reduces changes of hemodynamic responses and bispectral index scores compared with the Macintosh laryngoscope.
Videolaryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for adults undergoing tracheal intubation.视频喉镜与直接喉镜用于成人气管插管。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Apr 4;4(4):CD011136. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011136.pub3.
4
Comparisons of Videolaryngoscopes for Intubation Undergoing General Anesthesia: Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.全身麻醉下视频喉镜插管的比较:随机对照试验的系统评价和网状Meta分析
J Pers Med. 2022 Feb 26;12(3):363. doi: 10.3390/jpm12030363.
5
Lower maximum forces on oral structures when using gum-elastic bougie than when using endotracheal tube and stylet during both direct and indirect laryngoscopy by novices: a crossover study using a high-fidelity simulator.使用弹性牙弓比使用气管内导管和管芯在直接和间接喉镜检查时对口腔结构的最大力更低:使用高保真模拟器的交叉研究。
BMC Emerg Med. 2020 May 6;20(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s12873-020-00328-9.
6
A single-centre, randomised controlled feasibility pilot trial comparing performance of direct laryngoscopy versus videolaryngoscopy for endotracheal intubation in surgical patients.一项单中心随机对照可行性试点试验,比较直接喉镜检查与视频喉镜检查在外科手术患者气管插管中的操作表现。
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2019 Mar 28;5:50. doi: 10.1186/s40814-019-0433-6. eCollection 2019.
7
Longitudinal acquisition of endotracheal intubation skills in novice physicians.新手医生气管插管技能的纵向习得
PLoS One. 2017 Nov 14;12(11):e0188224. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0188224. eCollection 2017.
8
Videolaryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for adult patients requiring tracheal intubation.针对需要气管插管的成年患者,视频喉镜检查与直接喉镜检查的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Nov 15;11(11):CD011136. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011136.pub2.
9
Comparison of the force applied on oral structures during intubation attempts by novice physicians between the Macintosh direct laryngoscope, Airway Scope and C-MAC PM: a high-fidelity simulator-based study.基于高保真模拟器的研究:新手医生在使用麦金托什直接喉镜、气道镜和C-MAC PM进行插管尝试时对口腔结构施加的力的比较。
BMJ Open. 2016 May 23;6(5):e011039. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011039.
与 Macintosh 喉镜相比,使用 PENTAX-AWS(气道镜)进行气管插管可减少血流动力学反应和双频谱指数评分的变化。
J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2009 Oct;21(4):292-6. doi: 10.1097/ANA.0b013e3181a9c6dc.
4
Cervical spine motion: a fluoroscopic comparison of the AirTraq Laryngoscope versus the Macintosh laryngoscope.颈椎活动度:AirTraq喉镜与Macintosh喉镜的荧光透视比较
Anesthesiology. 2009 Jul;111(1):97-101. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181a8649f.
5
Tracheal intubation in patients with cervical spine immobilization: a comparison of the Airwayscope, LMA CTrach, and the Macintosh laryngoscopes.颈椎固定患者的气管插管:气道镜、LMA CTrach和麦金托什喉镜的比较
Br J Anaesth. 2009 May;102(5):654-61. doi: 10.1093/bja/aep056. Epub 2009 Mar 31.
6
Comparison of Macintosh, Truview EVO2, Glidescope, and Airwayscope laryngoscope use in patients with cervical spine immobilization.颈椎固定患者使用Macintosh、Truview EVO2、Glidescope和Airwayscope喉镜的比较。
Br J Anaesth. 2008 Nov;101(5):723-30. doi: 10.1093/bja/aen231. Epub 2008 Sep 9.
7
The Pentax-AWS((R)) rigid indirect video laryngoscope: clinical assessment of performance in 320 cases.宾得AWS(R)型硬质间接视频喉镜:320例临床性能评估
Anaesthesia. 2008 Jun;63(6):641-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2008.05452.x.
8
Cardiovascular responses to tracheal intubation with the Airway Scope (Pentax-AWS).使用气道镜(宾得AWS)进行气管插管时的心血管反应。
J Anesth. 2008;22(1):100-1. doi: 10.1007/s00540-007-0570-6. Epub 2008 Feb 27.
9
Pentax-AWS, a new videolaryngoscope, is more effective than the Macintosh laryngoscope for tracheal intubation in patients with restricted neck movements: a randomized comparative study.一项随机对照研究表明,新型视频喉镜宾得AWS在颈部活动受限患者的气管插管中比麦金托什喉镜更有效。
Br J Anaesth. 2008 Apr;100(4):544-8. doi: 10.1093/bja/aen002. Epub 2008 Jan 31.
10
Description and first clinical application of AirWay Scope for tracheal intubation.气道镜用于气管插管的描述及首次临床应用
J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2006 Oct;18(4):247-50. doi: 10.1097/00008506-200610000-00005.