Department of Family & Community Medicine, St. Michael's Hospital, 30 Bond St, Toronto, M5B 1W8, Canada.
Centre for Urban Health Solutions, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, Toronto, Canada.
BMC Cancer. 2019 Jan 9;19(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s12885-018-5201-0.
In Canada, clinical practice guidelines recommend breast cancer screening, but there are gaps in adherence to recommendations for screening, particularly among certain hard-to-reach populations, that may differ by province. We compared stage of diagnosis, proportion of screen-detected breast cancers, and length of diagnostic interval for immigrant women versus long-term residents of BC and Ontario.
We conducted a retrospective cohort study using linked administrative databases in BC and Ontario. We identified all women residing in either province who were diagnosed with incident invasive breast cancer between 2007 and 2011, and determined who was foreign-born using the Immigration Refugee and Citizenship Canada database. We used descriptive statistics and bivariate analyses to describe the sample and study outcomes. We conducted multivariate analyses (modified Poisson regression and quantile regression) to control for potential confounders.
There were 14,198 BC women and 46,952 Ontario women included in the study population, of which 11.8 and 11.7% were foreign-born respectively. In both provinces, immigrants and long-term residents had similar primary care access. In both provinces, immigrant women were significantly less likely to have a screen-detected breast cancer (adjusted relative risk 0.88 [0.79-0.96] in BC, 0.88 [0.84-0.93] in Ontario) and had a significantly longer median diagnostic interval (2 [0.2-3.8] days in BC, 5.5 [4.4-6.6] days in Ontario) than long-term residents. Women from East Asia and the Pacific were less likely to have a screen-detected cancer and had a longer diagnostic interval, but were diagnosed at an earlier stage than long-term residents. In Ontario, women from Latin America and the Caribbean and from South Asia were less likely to have a screen-detected cancer, had a longer median diagnostic interval, and were diagnosed at a later stage than long-term residents. These findings were not explained by access to primary care.
There are inequalities in breast cancer diagnosis for Canadian immigrant women. We have identified particular immigrant groups (women from Latin America and the Caribbean and from South Asia) that appear to be subject to disparities in the diagnostic process that need to be addressed in order to effectively reduce gaps in care.
在加拿大,临床实践指南建议进行乳腺癌筛查,但在某些难以接触到的人群中,建议的筛查依从性存在差距,而且这种差距可能因省份而异。我们比较了移民妇女与不列颠哥伦比亚省和安大略省长期居民的诊断阶段、筛查发现的乳腺癌比例和诊断间隔长度。
我们使用不列颠哥伦比亚省和安大略省的链接行政数据库进行了回顾性队列研究。我们确定了 2007 年至 2011 年间在这两个省中诊断出患有浸润性乳腺癌的所有居住在这两个省的女性,并通过加拿大移民、难民和公民局数据库确定了她们的移民身份。我们使用描述性统计和双变量分析来描述样本和研究结果。我们进行了多变量分析(修正泊松回归和分位数回归)以控制潜在的混杂因素。
研究人群包括 14198 名不列颠哥伦比亚省妇女和 46952 名安大略省妇女,其中分别有 11.8%和 11.7%是移民。在这两个省,移民和长期居民的初级保健机会相似。在这两个省,移民妇女筛查发现的乳腺癌的比例明显较低(不列颠哥伦比亚省的调整后相对风险 0.88 [0.79-0.96],安大略省的 0.88 [0.84-0.93]),诊断间隔中位数明显较长(不列颠哥伦比亚省的 2 [0.2-3.8]天,安大略省的 5.5 [4.4-6.6]天)比长期居民。东亚和太平洋地区的妇女筛查发现癌症的可能性较小,诊断间隔较长,但诊断时的分期比长期居民更早。在安大略省,来自拉丁美洲和加勒比地区以及南亚的妇女筛查发现癌症的可能性较小,诊断间隔中位数较长,诊断时的分期较长期居民更晚。这些发现不能用获得初级保健来解释。
加拿大移民妇女的乳腺癌诊断存在不平等现象。我们已经确定了一些特定的移民群体(来自拉丁美洲和加勒比地区以及南亚的妇女),他们似乎在诊断过程中存在差异,需要解决这些差异,以有效缩小护理差距。