Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
J Virol. 2019 Mar 5;93(6). doi: 10.1128/JVI.01986-18. Print 2019 Mar 15.
Airway epithelial cells and macrophages differ markedly in their responses to influenza A virus (IAV) infection. To investigate transcriptional responses underlying these differences, purified subsets of type II airway epithelial cells (ATII) and alveolar macrophages (AM) recovered from the lungs of mock- or IAV-infected mice at 9 h postinfection were subjected to RNA sequencing. This time point was chosen to allow for characterization of cell types first infected with the virus inoculum, prior to multicycle virus replication and the infiltration of inflammatory cells into the airways. In the absence of infection, AM predominantly expressed genes related to immunity, whereas ATII expressed genes consistent with their physiological roles in the lung. Following IAV infection, AM almost exclusively activated cell-intrinsic antiviral pathways that were dependent on interferon (IFN) regulatory factor 3/7 (IRF3/7) and/or type I IFN signaling. In contrast, IAV-infected ATII activated a broader range of physiological responses, including cell-intrinsic antiviral pathways, which were both independent of and dependent on IRF3/7 and/or type I IFN. These data suggest that transcriptional profiles hardwired during development are a major determinant underlying the different responses of ATII and AM to IAV infection. Airway epithelial cells (AEC) and airway macrophages (AM) represent major targets of influenza A virus (IAV) infection in the lung, yet the two cell types respond very differently to IAV infection. We have used RNA sequencing to define the host transcriptional responses in each cell type under steady-state conditions as well as following IAV infection. To do this, different cell subsets isolated from the lungs of mock- and IAV-infected mice were subjected to RNA sequencing. Under steady-state conditions, AM and AEC express distinct transcriptional activities, consistent with distinct physiological roles in the airways. Not surprisingly, these cells also exhibited major differences in transcriptional responses following IAV infection. These studies shed light on how the different transcriptional architectures of airway cells from two different lineages drive transcriptional responses to IAV infection.
气道上皮细胞和巨噬细胞对流感病毒 (IAV) 感染的反应明显不同。为了研究这些差异背后的转录反应,我们从模拟或 IAV 感染的小鼠肺部中分离出纯化的 II 型气道上皮细胞 (ATII) 和肺泡巨噬细胞 (AM) 亚群,在感染后 9 小时进行 RNA 测序。选择这个时间点是为了能够在病毒接种物首先感染细胞类型之前,对细胞类型进行特征描述,从而避免多轮病毒复制和炎症细胞浸润到气道中。在没有感染的情况下,AM 主要表达与免疫相关的基因,而 ATII 则表达与其在肺部中的生理作用一致的基因。在 IAV 感染后,AM 几乎只激活了依赖于干扰素 (IFN) 调节因子 3/7 (IRF3/7) 和/或 I 型 IFN 信号的细胞内抗病毒途径。相比之下,IAV 感染的 ATII 激活了更广泛的生理反应,包括细胞内抗病毒途径,这些反应既不依赖于也不依赖于 IRF3/7 和/或 I 型 IFN。这些数据表明,在发育过程中形成的转录谱是 ATII 和 AM 对 IAV 感染反应不同的主要决定因素。气道上皮细胞 (AEC) 和气道巨噬细胞 (AM) 是肺部流感 A 型病毒 (IAV) 感染的主要靶标,但这两种细胞对 IAV 感染的反应非常不同。我们使用 RNA 测序来定义每种细胞类型在稳态条件下以及感染 IAV 后的宿主转录反应。为此,我们从模拟和 IAV 感染的小鼠肺部中分离出不同的细胞亚群进行 RNA 测序。在稳态条件下,AM 和 AEC 表达不同的转录活性,这与它们在气道中的不同生理作用相一致。毫不奇怪,这些细胞在感染 IAV 后也表现出主要的转录反应差异。这些研究阐明了不同谱系的气道细胞的不同转录结构如何驱动对 IAV 感染的转录反应。