• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于检测痕量致敏剂以评估植物提取物的角蛋白敏感细胞试验(KeratinoSens)和人角质形成细胞暴露试验(h-CLAT)的敏感性。

Sensitivity of KeratinoSens and h-CLAT for detecting minute amounts of sensitizers to evaluate botanical extract.

作者信息

Nishijo Taku, Miyazawa Masaaki, Saito Kazutoshi, Otsubo Yuki, Mizumachi Hideyuki, Sakaguchi Hitoshi

机构信息

Safety Science Research Laboratories, Kao Corporation.

出版信息

J Toxicol Sci. 2019;44(1):13-21. doi: 10.2131/jts.44.13.

DOI:10.2131/jts.44.13
PMID:30626776
Abstract

Cosmetic ingredients are often complex mixtures from natural sources such as botanical extracts that might contain minute amounts of constituents with sensitizing potential. The sensitivity of in vitro skin sensitization test methods such as KeratinoSens and h-CLAT for the detection of minute amounts of sensitizer in mixtures remains unclear. In this study, we assessed the detection sensitivity of the binary test battery comprising KeratinoSens and h-CLAT for minute amounts of sensitizers by comparing the LLNA EC3 (estimated concentration of a substance expected to produce a stimulation index of 3) values to the minimum detection concentrations (MDCs) exceeding the positive criteria for each of the two in vitro test methods. 146 sensitizers with both sets of in vitro data and LLNA data were used. MDC values for KeratinoSens and h-CLAT were calculated from exposure concentrations exceeding positive criteria for each in vitro test method (EC1.5 and minimum induction thresholds, respectively). The dilution rate used to expose culture medium was also considered. For 86% of analyzed sensitizers, the in vitro test methods showed MDC values lower than LLNA EC3 values, suggesting that the binary test battery with KeratinoSens and h-CLAT have greater sensitivity for detection of minute amounts of sensitizer than LLNA. These results suggest the high applicability of KeratinoSens and h-CLAT for detecting skin sensitizing constituents present in botanical extract.

摘要

化妆品成分通常是来自天然来源的复杂混合物,如植物提取物,其中可能含有微量具有致敏潜力的成分。对于检测混合物中微量致敏剂的体外皮肤致敏试验方法,如角质形成细胞传感试验(KeratinoSens)和人细胞系激活试验(h-CLAT),其灵敏度尚不清楚。在本研究中,我们通过将限量稀释法(LLNA)的半数有效浓度(EC3,预计产生刺激指数为3的物质浓度)值与超过两种体外试验方法各自阳性标准的最低检测浓度(MDC)进行比较,评估了由KeratinoSens和h-CLAT组成的二元试验组合对微量致敏剂的检测灵敏度。使用了146种具有两组体外数据和LLNA数据的致敏剂。KeratinoSens和h-CLAT的MDC值是根据超过每种体外试验方法阳性标准的暴露浓度(分别为EC1.5和最低诱导阈值)计算得出的。还考虑了用于暴露培养基的稀释率。对于86%的分析致敏剂,体外试验方法显示MDC值低于LLNA EC3值,这表明由KeratinoSens和h-CLAT组成的二元试验组合比LLNA对检测微量致敏剂具有更高的灵敏度。这些结果表明KeratinoSens和h-CLAT在检测植物提取物中存在的皮肤致敏成分方面具有很高的适用性。

相似文献

1
Sensitivity of KeratinoSens and h-CLAT for detecting minute amounts of sensitizers to evaluate botanical extract.用于检测痕量致敏剂以评估植物提取物的角蛋白敏感细胞试验(KeratinoSens)和人角质形成细胞暴露试验(h-CLAT)的敏感性。
J Toxicol Sci. 2019;44(1):13-21. doi: 10.2131/jts.44.13.
2
The dermal sensitization threshold (DST) approach for mixtures evaluated as negative in in vitro test methods; mixture DST.在体外测试方法中被评估为阴性的混合物的皮肤致敏阈值(DST)方法;混合物DST
J Toxicol Sci. 2019;44(1):23-34. doi: 10.2131/jts.44.23.
3
In vitro testing strategy for assessing the skin sensitizing potential of "difficult to test" cosmetic ingredients.评估“难测试”化妆品成分皮肤致敏性的体外测试策略。
Toxicol In Vitro. 2020 Jun;65:104781. doi: 10.1016/j.tiv.2020.104781. Epub 2020 Jan 27.
4
Binary test battery with KeratinoSens™ and h-CLAT as part of a bottom-up approach for skin sensitization hazard prediction.以KeratinoSens™和h-CLAT作为自下而上的皮肤致敏危害预测方法一部分的二元测试组合。
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2017 Aug;88:118-124. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2017.06.002. Epub 2017 Jun 7.
5
Prediction of skin sensitization potency of chemicals by human Cell Line Activation Test (h-CLAT) and an attempt at classifying skin sensitization potency.通过人源细胞激活试验(h-CLAT)预测化学品的皮肤致敏强度,并尝试对皮肤致敏强度进行分类。
Toxicol In Vitro. 2012 Oct;26(7):1150-60. doi: 10.1016/j.tiv.2012.07.001. Epub 2012 Jul 10.
6
Evaluation of combinations of in vitro sensitization test descriptors for the artificial neural network-based risk assessment model of skin sensitization.基于人工神经网络的皮肤致敏风险评估模型的体外致敏试验描述符组合评估
J Appl Toxicol. 2015 Nov;35(11):1333-47. doi: 10.1002/jat.3105. Epub 2015 Mar 30.
7
Integrated decision strategies for skin sensitization hazard.皮肤致敏危害的综合决策策略
J Appl Toxicol. 2016 Sep;36(9):1150-62. doi: 10.1002/jat.3281. Epub 2016 Feb 6.
8
Data integration of non-animal tests for the development of a test battery to predict the skin sensitizing potential and potency of chemicals.非动物测试数据的整合,用于开发预测化学品皮肤致敏潜力和效力的测试组合。
Toxicol In Vitro. 2013 Mar;27(2):609-18. doi: 10.1016/j.tiv.2012.11.006. Epub 2012 Nov 10.
9
Predictive performance for human skin sensitizing potential of the human cell line activation test (h-CLAT).人源细胞激活试验(h-CLAT)预测人类皮肤致敏潜能的性能。
Contact Dermatitis. 2011 Dec;65(6):343-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.2011.01952.x. Epub 2011 Jul 18.
10
Prediction of skin sensitization potency using machine learning approaches.使用机器学习方法预测皮肤致敏潜力。
J Appl Toxicol. 2017 Jul;37(7):792-805. doi: 10.1002/jat.3424. Epub 2017 Jan 10.

引用本文的文献

1
New Horizons in Skin Sensitization Assessment of Complex Mixtures: The Use of New Approach Methodologies Beyond Regulatory Approaches.复杂混合物皮肤致敏评估的新视野:超越监管方法使用新方法学
Toxics. 2025 Aug 20;13(8):693. doi: 10.3390/toxics13080693.
2
Reapplication of the Type IV Hypersensitivity Quantitative Risk Assessment to Assess Ingredients Used on Canines.重新应用IV型超敏反应定量风险评估来评估用于犬类的成分。
Vet Med Sci. 2025 Jul;11(4):e70463. doi: 10.1002/vms3.70463.
3
Alternative Methods for Skin-Sensitization Assessment.
皮肤致敏性评估的替代方法。
Toxics. 2022 Nov 29;10(12):740. doi: 10.3390/toxics10120740.
4
Evaluating Confidence in Toxicity Assessments Based on Experimental Data and Predictions.基于实验数据和预测评估毒性评估的可信度。
Comput Toxicol. 2022 Feb;21. doi: 10.1016/j.comtox.2021.100204. Epub 2021 Nov 8.
5
Evaluation of the Skin-Sensitizing Potential of Brazilian Green Propolis.巴西绿蜂胶的皮肤致敏性评价。
Int J Mol Sci. 2021 Dec 17;22(24):13538. doi: 10.3390/ijms222413538.