Straßmayr Christa, Niedermayer Gabriele, Katschnig Heinz
IMEHPS.research - Forschungsinstitut für Sozialpsychiatrie, Glasergasse 24/23, 1090, Wien, Österreich.
Klinische Abteilung für Sozialpsychiatrie, Medizinische Universität Wien, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Wien, Österreich.
Neuropsychiatr. 2019 Jun;33(2):98-106. doi: 10.1007/s40211-018-0297-7. Epub 2019 Jan 9.
In a qualitative study using thematic analysis of focus group interviews with service users their perspectives and experiences concerning the process of seeking admission to psychiatric inpatient care in Austria were explored. The aim of the study was to better understand service users' motivation, decisions and actions in the process of seeking psychiatric hospitalisation. Results show that admission to psychiatric inpatient care was often sought directly without a referral from an outpatient service. An important motivation was the lack of availability of alternatives to inpatient care in situations of a severe acute crisis. In this situation service users often found themselves in a conflict between positive expectations related to symptom improvement and a protective environment, and memories of previous negative experiences, such as stigma and coercion. Coercion and involuntary admission were recurring topics in the narratives of the focus group participants, not only of those who had actually experienced such situations. Seeking hospitalisation was considered as enormously burdening, which was intensified in many cases by the experience of refusal of hospitalisation by the staff. Overall, service users stressed that they found themselves at the lower end of the decision hierarchy, with relatives, doctors, ambulance services and police having more impact on the decision about a psychiatric hospitalisation. Suggestions for improving psychiatric care derived from the analysis include a better coordination between inpatient and outpatient care and the creation of alternative services which are located between the acute inpatient services and the selective ambulatory services in the outpatient sector.
在一项定性研究中,通过对服务使用者进行焦点小组访谈的主题分析,探讨了他们对奥地利精神病住院护理寻求过程的看法和经历。该研究的目的是更好地理解服务使用者在寻求精神病住院治疗过程中的动机、决策和行动。结果表明,精神病住院护理的入院往往是直接寻求的,而没有来自门诊服务的转诊。一个重要的动机是在严重急性危机情况下,缺乏住院护理的替代选择。在这种情况下,服务使用者常常发现自己处于与症状改善和保护性环境相关的积极期望与以前负面经历(如耻辱感和强制手段)的记忆之间的冲突之中。强制手段和非自愿入院是焦点小组参与者叙述中反复出现的话题,不仅是那些实际经历过此类情况的人。寻求住院治疗被认为负担极重,在许多情况下,工作人员拒绝住院的经历加剧了这种负担。总体而言,服务使用者强调他们在决策等级中处于较低位置,亲属、医生、救护车服务人员和警察对精神病住院治疗的决策有更大影响。分析得出的改善精神病护理的建议包括加强住院护理和门诊护理之间的协调,以及在急性住院服务和门诊部门的选择性门诊服务之间创建替代服务。