Faculty of Medicine and Health, University Health Care Research Center, Örebro University, 70182, Örebro, SE, Sweden.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Nov 20;21(1):1255. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-07178-6.
Many psychiatric services include social inclusion as a policy with the aim to offer users the opportunity to participate in care and to form reciprocal relationships. The aim of this study was to explore opportunities and problems with regard to participation, reciprocity and social justice that different stakeholders experience when it comes to social inclusion for service users and minimizing violence in psychiatric inpatient care.
Qualitative interviews were performed with 12 service users, 15 staff members, and six ward managers in three different kinds of psychiatric wards in Sweden. The data were analyzed using the framework method and qualitative content analysis, which was based on the three following social inclusion values: participation, reciprocity, and social justice.
Themes and subthemes were inductively constructed within the three social inclusion values. For participation, staff and ward managers reported difficulties in involving service users in their care, while service users did not feel that they participated and worried about what would happen after discharge. Staff gave more positive descriptions of their relationships with service users and the possibility for reciprocity. Service users described a lack of social justice, such as disruptive care, a lack of support from services, not having access to care, or negative experiences of coercive measures. Despite this, service users often saw the ward as being safer than outside the hospital. Staff and managers reported worries about staffing, staff competence, minimizing coercion and violence, and a lack of support from the management.
By applying the tentative model on empirical data we identified factors that can support or disrupt the process to create a safe ward where service users can feel socially included. Our results indicate that that staff and service users may have different views on the reciprocity of their relationships, and that users may experience a lack of social justice. The users may, due to harsh living conditions, be more concerned about the risk of violence in the community than as inpatients. Staff and ward managers need support from the management to foster a sense of community in the ward and to implement evidence-based prevention programs.
许多精神科服务将社会包容作为一项政策,旨在为用户提供参与护理的机会,并形成互惠关系。本研究旨在探讨不同利益相关者在为服务使用者实现社会包容和最大限度减少精神科住院患者暴力方面所面临的参与、互惠和社会公正的机会和问题。
在瑞典的三家不同类型的精神病病房中,对 12 名服务使用者、15 名工作人员和 6 名病房经理进行了定性访谈。数据采用框架法和基于参与、互惠和社会公正三个社会包容价值观的定性内容分析进行分析。
在三个社会包容价值观中,通过归纳法构建了主题和子主题。在参与方面,工作人员和病房经理报告说,让服务使用者参与他们的护理存在困难,而服务使用者则觉得自己没有参与感,并担心出院后的情况。工作人员对他们与服务使用者的关系以及互惠的可能性给予了更积极的描述。服务使用者描述了缺乏社会公正的情况,例如护理混乱、缺乏服务支持、无法获得护理,或遭受强制措施的负面经历。尽管如此,服务使用者通常认为病房比医院外更安全。工作人员和管理人员报告了对人员配备、工作人员能力、尽量减少强制和暴力以及缺乏管理层支持的担忧。
通过将试探性模型应用于经验数据,我们确定了支持或破坏创建一个安全病房的过程的因素,在该病房中,服务使用者可以感到社会包容。我们的结果表明,工作人员和服务使用者可能对他们关系的互惠性有不同的看法,而且用户可能会体验到社会不公正。由于恶劣的生活条件,与住院患者相比,用户可能更担心社区中的暴力风险。工作人员和病房经理需要管理层的支持,以在病房中营造社区感,并实施基于证据的预防计划。