• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[六种消化方法对利用荧光强度测定生物体中聚苯乙烯微塑料的影响]

[Influence of Six Digestion Methods on the Determination of Polystyrene Microplastics in Organisms Using the Fluorescence Intensity].

作者信息

Zou Ya-Dan, Xu Qing-Qing, Zhang Ge, Li Fu-Yun, Li Feng-Min

机构信息

Key Laboratory of Marine Environment and Ecology, Ministry of Education, Institute of Coastal Environmental Pollution Control, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266100, China.

出版信息

Huan Jing Ke Xue. 2019 Jan 8;40(1):496-503. doi: 10.13227/j.hjkx.201804072.

DOI:10.13227/j.hjkx.201804072
PMID:30628310
Abstract

Microplastic pollution has become a global environmental problem and is a cause of great concern. To evaluate the biological effects of microplastics, microplastics in organisms need to be accurately quantified. The quantification of microplastics in organisms using the fluorescence intensity is common; the digestion of biological samples is an important pretreatment method. However, the microplastics may be destroyed by digestion, which affects the fluorescence intensity of the microplastics and results in large deviations between measured and true values. In this study, six commonly used digestive agents were studied:KOH, NaOH, HO, HNO, HNO:HCl, and HNO:HClO. The effect of different digestion methods on the fluorescence intensity and surface morphology of microplastics was studied and the most suitable protocol was selected. The results show that, among the six different digestion methods, KOH digestion (100 g·L, 60℃) has the least influence on the fluorescence intensity of the microplastics and does not affect their surface morphology. The other five digestion methods lead to different degrees of reduction of the fluorescence intensity of microplastics and damage the microplastics' surface (aggregation, bubbles, scratches, and depressions). In addition, the KOH digestion method was used to extract microplastics from biological samples. The recovery rate was ≥ 96.3%±0.5%, indicating that the KOH digestion method is suitable for fluorescent microplastics in biological samples.

摘要

微塑料污染已成为一个全球性的环境问题,备受关注。为了评估微塑料的生物学效应,需要准确量化生物体中的微塑料。利用荧光强度对生物体中的微塑料进行量化很常见;生物样品的消解是一种重要的预处理方法。然而,微塑料可能会因消解而被破坏,这会影响微塑料的荧光强度,导致测量值与真实值之间存在较大偏差。在本研究中,对六种常用的消解剂进行了研究:氢氧化钾(KOH)、氢氧化钠(NaOH)、过氧化氢(H₂O₂)、硝酸(HNO₃)、硝酸:盐酸(HNO₃:HCl)和硝酸:高氯酸(HNO₃:HClO₄)。研究了不同消解方法对微塑料荧光强度和表面形态的影响,并选择了最合适的方案。结果表明,在六种不同的消解方法中,氢氧化钾消解(100 g·L⁻¹,60℃)对微塑料荧光强度的影响最小,且不影响其表面形态。其他五种消解方法导致微塑料荧光强度不同程度降低,并损害微塑料表面(聚集、气泡、划痕和凹陷)。此外,采用氢氧化钾消解方法从生物样品中提取微塑料。回收率≥96.3%±0.5%,表明氢氧化钾消解方法适用于生物样品中的荧光微塑料。

相似文献

1
[Influence of Six Digestion Methods on the Determination of Polystyrene Microplastics in Organisms Using the Fluorescence Intensity].[六种消化方法对利用荧光强度测定生物体中聚苯乙烯微塑料的影响]
Huan Jing Ke Xue. 2019 Jan 8;40(1):496-503. doi: 10.13227/j.hjkx.201804072.
2
Comparison of six digestion methods on fluorescent intensity and morphology of the fluorescent polystyrene beads.六种消化方法对荧光聚苯乙烯微球荧光强度和形态的比较。
Mar Pollut Bull. 2018 Jun;131(Pt A):515-524. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2018.04.056. Epub 2018 May 1.
3
Accumulation of polystyrene microplastics in juvenile Eriocheir sinensis and oxidative stress effects in the liver.聚苯乙烯微塑料在中华绒螯蟹幼体中的积累及其对肝脏的氧化应激效应。
Aquat Toxicol. 2018 Jul;200:28-36. doi: 10.1016/j.aquatox.2018.04.015. Epub 2018 Apr 24.
4
Chitinase digestion for the analysis of microplastics in chitinaceous organisms using the terrestrial isopod Oniscus asellus L. as a model organism.使用陆生性等足目动物(如食碎屑蜚蠊)作为模式生物,通过几丁质酶消化来分析含有几丁质的生物体中的微塑料。
Sci Total Environ. 2021 Sep 10;786:147455. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147455. Epub 2021 Apr 30.
5
Oil extraction following digestion to separate microplastics from mussels.消化后进行油提取,以从贻贝中分离微塑料。
Chemosphere. 2022 Feb;289:133187. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.133187. Epub 2021 Dec 7.
6
Food preference determines the best suitable digestion protocol for analysing microplastic ingestion by fish.食物偏好决定了分析鱼类摄入微塑料的最佳消化方案。
Mar Pollut Bull. 2020 May;154:111050. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2020.111050. Epub 2020 Mar 12.
7
Identifying a quick and efficient method of removing organic matter without damaging microplastic samples.寻找一种快速高效的去除有机物的方法,同时不损坏微塑料样品。
Sci Total Environ. 2019 Oct 10;686:131-139. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.05.456. Epub 2019 Jun 3.
8
Interlaboratory comparison of microplastic extraction methods from marine biota tissues: A harmonization exercise of the Plastic Busters MPAs project.海洋生物组织中微塑料提取方法的实验室间比较:塑料克星 MPAs 项目的协调工作。
Mar Pollut Bull. 2021 Mar;164:111992. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2021.111992. Epub 2021 Jan 22.
9
An effective method for evaluation of microplastic contaminant in gastropod from Taihu Lake, China.中国太湖腹足类中微塑料污染物的评估方法。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2020 Jun;27(18):22878-22887. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-08747-8. Epub 2020 Apr 23.
10
Microplastic extraction from digestive tracts of large decapods.从大型十足目动物消化道中提取微塑料。
Mar Pollut Bull. 2024 Sep;206:116709. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2024.116709. Epub 2024 Jul 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Study on the toxic effect of seawater-aged microplastics on Philippine curtain clams.海水老化微塑料对菲律宾帘蛤的毒性效应研究
Sci Rep. 2025 May 24;15(1):18078. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-02823-0.