Department of Experimental Oncology, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, SI‑1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Department of Environmental Sciences, Jozef Stefan Institute, SI‑1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Oncol Rep. 2019 Mar;41(3):1658-1668. doi: 10.3892/or.2019.6960. Epub 2019 Jan 9.
Electrochemotherapy is an established local ablative method used for the treatment of different tumor types, including tumors of the head and neck area. Clinical studies have demonstrated a lower response rate of tumors that recur in pre‑irradiated area. The aim of the present study was to explore the response of experimentally induced radioresistant cells and tumors to electrochemotherapy with cisplatin or bleomycin. The radioresistant cells (FaDu‑RR) were established by fractionated irradiation of parental human squamous cell carcinoma cell line, FaDu. We compared the 2 cell lines in response to chemotherapy and electrochemotherapy with cisplatin or bleomycin in vitro and in vivo. Using specific mass spectrometry‑based analytical methods we determined the difference in the uptake of chemotherapeutics in tumors after electrochemotherapy. Additionally, we compared the capacity of the cells to repair DNA double‑strand breaks (DSB) after exposure to the drugs used in electrochemotherapy with the γH2AX foci resolution determined by immunofluorescence microscopy. Our results indicate radio‑ and cisplatin cross‑resistance, confirmed with the lower response rate of radioresistant tumors after electrochemotherapy with cisplatin. On the other hand, the sensitivity to electrochemotherapy with bleomycin was similar in both cell lines and tumors. While the uptake of chemotherapeutics after electrochemotherapy was comparable in both tumor models, there was a difference between the cell lines in capacity to repair DNA DSB‑the radioresistant cells had a lower level of DSB and faster DNA repair rate after exposure to both, cisplatin or bleomycin. Due to the higher complete response rate after electrochemotherapy with bleomycin than with cisplatin, we conclude that the results favor bleomycin‑over cisplatin‑based electrochemotherapy for treatment of radioresistant tumors and/or tumors that regrow after radiotherapy.
电化学疗法是一种已确立的局部消融方法,用于治疗包括头颈部区域肿瘤在内的不同肿瘤类型。临床研究表明,在放射治疗过的区域复发的肿瘤的反应率较低。本研究旨在探讨实验诱导的耐辐射细胞和肿瘤对顺铂或博来霉素电化学疗法的反应。耐辐射细胞(FaDu-RR)通过对亲本人鳞状细胞癌细胞系 FaDu 进行分次照射建立。我们比较了这 2 种细胞系在体外和体内对顺铂或博来霉素化疗和电化学疗法的反应。使用基于特定质谱的分析方法,我们确定了电化学疗法后肿瘤内化疗药物摄取的差异。此外,我们比较了细胞在暴露于电化学疗法中使用的药物后修复 DNA 双链断裂(DSB)的能力,通过免疫荧光显微镜测定 γH2AX 焦点分辨率。我们的结果表明存在放射和顺铂交叉耐药性,经电化学疗法用顺铂治疗后耐辐射肿瘤的反应率较低得到证实。另一方面,两种细胞系和肿瘤对博来霉素电化学疗法的敏感性相似。虽然电化学疗法后化疗药物的摄取在两种肿瘤模型中相似,但细胞系之间在修复 DNA DSB 的能力上存在差异-耐辐射细胞在暴露于顺铂或博来霉素后 DSB 水平较低,且 DNA 修复速度较快。由于博来霉素电化学疗法后的完全缓解率高于顺铂电化学疗法,我们得出结论,结果支持博来霉素电化学疗法优于顺铂电化学疗法,用于治疗耐辐射肿瘤和/或放射治疗后复发的肿瘤。