Suppr超能文献

多焦点隐形眼镜:走向个性化定制?

Multifocal contact lenses: towards customisation?

作者信息

Faria-Ribeiro Miguel, González-Méijome José M

机构信息

Clinical & Experimental Optometry Research Lab (CEORLab), Centre of Physics, University of Minho, Braga, Portugal.

出版信息

Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2019 Jan;39(1):37-45. doi: 10.1111/opo.12597.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Firstly, to determine if eyes with spherical aberration (SA) that deviates significantly from the average level underperform when fitted with a simultaneous-imaging contact lens (CL) with a power profile calculated for an 'average eye'. Secondly, to determine if CL customisation can improve image quality in these eyes after fitting with a bifocal CL.

METHODS

A statistical model of the wavefront aberration function of normal eyes was used to generate a vector of Zernike fourth-order SA coefficients from 100 synthetic eyes. Four bifocal power profiles were modelled: centre-near (CN) or centre-distance (CD), and two-zone or four-zone. All designs had 0.1-mm-wide transition zones. Different levels of distance and add powers were modelled, using well-established computational wave-optics methods. Zone widths were optimised to obtain maximal multifocal efficiency (MFE), a metric based on the visual Strehl that synthesises the through-focus curve in one number. The MFE was calculated for each synthetic eye coupled with each bifocal power profile.

RESULTS

For an 'average eye', the mean MFE values were 0.33 vs 0.25 and 0.32 vs 0.29, for CN vs CD and two vs four zone designs, respectively. When the four power profiles were assessed in eyes with non-average levels of ocular SA, the MFE decreased with higher levels of SA (eye and CL combined) for all designs. Some of this reduction in MFE could be prevented by adjusting the nominal distance and add power of the bifocal profiles to compensate for the increased or decreased level of combined SA. The four-zone CN profile showed better tolerance for different levels of ocular SA than the two-zone designs, but this was not true for the four-zone CD design.

CONCLUSION

Eyes with SA levels differing significantly from the average level underperform when fitted with simultaneous-imaging CLs with power profiles calculated for average eyes. Our findings suggest that visual performance at distance and near when wearing bifocal CLs can be improved by using a semi-customised approach.

摘要

目的

首先,确定当为“平均眼”计算屈光度分布的同步成像隐形眼镜(CL)佩戴于球差(SA)显著偏离平均水平的眼睛时,这些眼睛的表现是否较差。其次,确定在佩戴双焦点CL后,CL定制是否可以改善这些眼睛的图像质量。

方法

使用正常眼睛波前像差函数的统计模型从100只合成眼睛生成泽尼克四阶SA系数向量。对四种双焦点屈光度分布进行建模:中心近用(CN)或中心远用(CD),以及两区或四区。所有设计都有0.1毫米宽的过渡区。使用成熟的计算波动光学方法对不同水平的远用和附加屈光度进行建模。优化区宽以获得最大多焦点效率(MFE),这是一种基于视觉斯特列尔比的指标,它将全聚焦曲线综合为一个数字。计算每只合成眼睛与每种双焦点屈光度分布组合的MFE。

结果

对于“平均眼”,CN与CD设计以及两区与四区设计的平均MFE值分别为0.33对0.25和0.32对0.29。当在眼SA水平非平均的眼睛中评估这四种屈光度分布时,所有设计的MFE都随着SA水平(眼睛和CL组合)的升高而降低。通过调整双焦点分布的标称远用和附加屈光度以补偿组合SA升高或降低的水平,可以防止MFE的一些降低。四区CN分布对不同水平的眼SA显示出比两区设计更好的耐受性,但四区CD设计并非如此。

结论

当佩戴为平均眼睛计算屈光度分布的同步成像CL时,SA水平与平均水平有显著差异的眼睛表现较差。我们的研究结果表明,使用半定制方法可以改善佩戴双焦点CL时远处和近处的视觉性能。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验