Regional Tuberculosis Reference Laboratory, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Swedish Institute for Infectious Disease Control, Stockholm, Sweden.
J Glob Antimicrob Resist. 2019 Jun;17:242-244. doi: 10.1016/j.jgar.2018.12.022. Epub 2019 Jan 7.
Conventional indirect drug susceptibility testing (DST) of Mycobacterium tuberculosis with solid media is inexpensive and reliable, but time-consuming. This study aimed to evaluate direct DST for testing sputum samples without culture to significantly reduce the time required to detect multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB).
Direct and indirect DST of isoniazid (INH), rifampicin (RIF) and ethambutol (EMB) were performed on 334 sputum smear-positive specimens.
There was full agreement between the results obtained from direct testing and after isolation of the bacteria by culture. Thus, the sensitivity and specificity were observed to be 100% for all three tested drugs when compared with indirect DST. In comparison with indirect DST, none of the samples with the direct method took >25days to report the DST (between 15-25days with a mean detection time of 20 days).
Direct DST on solid media was shown to give reliable results at a much earlier stage than conventional phenotypic DST. The direct method was found to be more rapid, more accurate and simpler. In addition, it reduced the handling of pathogenic bacteria and thus reduced the bio hazards related to conventional DST.
传统的结核分枝杆菌固体培养基间接药敏试验(DST)价格低廉且可靠,但耗时较长。本研究旨在评估直接 DST 检测痰标本,无需培养,以显著缩短检测耐多药结核分枝杆菌(MDR-TB)的时间。
对 334 份痰涂片阳性标本进行直接和间接异烟肼(INH)、利福平(RIF)和乙胺丁醇(EMB)DST 检测。
直接检测与细菌培养分离后获得的结果完全一致。因此,与间接 DST 相比,三种检测药物的敏感性和特异性均为 100%。与间接 DST 相比,直接法报告 DST 的所有样本均无需>25 天(15-25 天,平均检测时间为 20 天)。
直接 DST 在固体培养基上的结果比传统表型 DST 更早、更可靠。直接法更快、更准确、更简单。此外,它减少了对病原菌的处理,从而降低了与传统 DST 相关的生物危害。