Suppr超能文献

德拉马尼联合优化背景治疗方案治疗耐多药结核病的疗效和安全性:一项多中心、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、平行分组 3 期临床试验。

Efficacy and safety of delamanid in combination with an optimised background regimen for treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis: a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group phase 3 trial.

机构信息

Task Applied Science, Cape Town, South Africa.

Hospital Nacional Sergio E Bernales, Lima, Peru.

出版信息

Lancet Respir Med. 2019 Mar;7(3):249-259. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(18)30426-0. Epub 2019 Jan 7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Delamanid is one of two recently approved drugs for the treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis. We aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of delamanid in the first 6 months of treatment.

METHODS

This randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial was done at 17 sites in seven countries (Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Moldova, Peru, the Philippines, and South Africa). We enrolled eligible adults (>18 years) with pulmonary multidrug-resistant tuberculosis to receive, in combination with an optimised background regimen developed according to WHO and national guidelines, either oral delamanid (100 mg twice daily) for 2 months followed by 200 mg once daily for 4 months or placebo (same regimen). Patients were centrally randomised (2:1) and stratified by risk category for delayed sputum culture conversion. Primary outcomes were the time to sputum culture conversion over 6 months and the difference in the distribution of time to sputum culture conversion over 6 months between the two groups, as assessed in the modified intention-to-treat population. The trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01424670.

FINDINGS

Between Sept 2, 2011, and Nov 27, 2013, we screened 714 patients, of whom 511 were randomly assigned (341 to delamanid plus optimised background regimen [delamanid group] and 170 to placebo plus optimised background regimen [placebo group]) and formed the safety analysis population. 327 patients were culture-positive for multidrug-resistant tuberculosis at baseline and comprised the efficacy analysis population (226 in the delamanid group and 101 in the placebo group). Median time to sputum culture conversion did not differ between the two groups (p=0·0562; modified Peto-Peto), with 51 days (IQR 29-98) in the delamanid group and 57 days (43-85) in the placebo group; the hazard ratio was 1·17 (95% CI 0·91-1·51, p=0·2157). 501 (98·0%) of 511 patients had at least one treatment-emergent adverse event. 136 (26·6%) of 511 patients had at least one serious treatment-emergent adverse event; the incidence was similar between treatment groups (89 [26·1%] of 341 patients for delamanid and 47 [27·6%] of 170 for placebo). Deaths related to treatment-emergent adverse events were similar between groups (15 [4·4%] of 341 for delamanid and six [3·5%] of 170 for placebo). No deaths were considered to be related to delamanid.

INTERPRETATION

The reduction in median time to sputum culture conversion over 6 months was not significant in the primary analysis. Delamanid was well tolerated with a highly characterised safety profile. Further evaluation of delamanid is needed to determine its role in a rapidly evolving standard of care.

FUNDING

Otsuka Pharmaceutical.

摘要

背景

德拉马尼是最近批准的两种治疗耐多药结核病药物之一。我们旨在评估德拉马尼在治疗的前 6 个月的安全性和疗效。

方法

这是一项在七个国家(爱沙尼亚、拉脱维亚、立陶宛、摩尔多瓦、秘鲁、菲律宾和南非)的 17 个地点进行的随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、3 期试验。我们招募了符合条件的成年(>18 岁)患有肺耐多药结核病患者,他们接受了优化的背景方案治疗,该方案是根据世界卫生组织和国家指南制定的,联合使用口服德拉马尼(每日 2 次,每次 100mg,持续 2 个月,然后每天 1 次,每次 200mg,持续 4 个月)或安慰剂(相同方案)。患者采用中央随机(2:1)和根据延迟痰培养转换风险类别分层。主要终点是 6 个月时痰培养转换的时间和两组之间 6 个月时痰培养转换时间分布的差异,这是在改良意向治疗人群中评估的。该试验在 ClinicalTrials.gov 上注册,编号为 NCT01424670。

结果

2011 年 9 月 2 日至 2013 年 11 月 27 日,我们筛查了 714 名患者,其中 511 名被随机分配(341 名接受德拉马尼加优化背景方案[德拉马尼组],170 名接受安慰剂加优化背景方案[安慰剂组]),并形成了安全性分析人群。327 名患者基线时痰培养呈耐多药结核病阳性,构成疗效分析人群(德拉马尼组 226 名,安慰剂组 101 名)。两组痰培养转换的中位时间无差异(p=0.0562;改良 Peto-Peto),德拉马尼组为 51 天(IQR 29-98),安慰剂组为 57 天(43-85);风险比为 1.17(95%CI 0.91-1.51,p=0.2157)。511 名患者中,有 501 名(98.0%)至少发生了一次治疗中出现的不良事件。511 名患者中有 136 名(26.6%)至少发生了一次严重的治疗中出现的不良事件;两组的发生率相似(德拉马尼组 341 名患者中有 89 名[26.1%],安慰剂组 170 名患者中有 47 名[27.6%])。与治疗中出现的不良事件相关的死亡在两组中相似(德拉马尼组 341 名患者中有 15 名[4.4%],安慰剂组 170 名患者中有 6 名[3.5%])。没有死亡被认为与德拉马尼有关。

解释

在主要分析中,6 个月时痰培养转换的中位数时间没有显著减少。德拉马尼具有良好的耐受性,具有高度特征化的安全性特征。需要进一步评估德拉马尼,以确定其在快速发展的标准治疗中的作用。

资金

大冢制药。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验