Schjønning Nielsen Malene, Simonsen Anja Hviid, Siersma Volkert, Engedal Knut, Jelic Vesna, Andersen Birgitte Bo, Naik Mala, Hasselbalch Steen Gregers, Høgh Peter
Regional Dementia Research Centre, Department of Neurology, Zealand University Hospital, Roskilde, Denmark.
Danish Dementia Research Centre, Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Dement Geriatr Cogn Dis Extra. 2018 Nov 27;8(3):426-438. doi: 10.1159/000490788. eCollection 2018 Sep-Dec.
To examine diagnostic and prognostic potential of quantitative electroencephalography (qEEG) analyzed by the statistical pattern recognition (SPR) method in patients with cognitive impairment. We compared the differential diagnostic ability of SPR to visual EEG analysis. Correlation between SPR findings and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) Alzheimer disease (AD) biomarkers were evaluated.
It is a multicenter cohort study involving 129 patients, (mild cognitive impairment [MCI], AD, and healthy controls). Standardized EEG was performed at baseline. Patients were continuously clinically evaluated.
Receiver Operating Characteristic curves showed a low discriminative ability of SPR and no ability to predict clinical progression in patients with MCI. Moderate correlation between SPR analysis and CSF AD biomarkers was found.
The diagnostic and prognostic abilities of qEEG were low. The SPR method was superior to the visual EEG analysis. The qEEG method correlates well to CSF AD biomarkers, suggesting association with pathology in AD.
探讨采用统计模式识别(SPR)方法分析定量脑电图(qEEG)对认知障碍患者的诊断及预后价值。我们比较了SPR与脑电图视觉分析的鉴别诊断能力。评估了SPR结果与脑脊液(CSF)阿尔茨海默病(AD)生物标志物之间的相关性。
这是一项多中心队列研究,纳入129例患者(轻度认知障碍[MCI]、AD和健康对照)。在基线时进行标准化脑电图检查。对患者进行持续的临床评估。
受试者工作特征曲线显示,SPR的鉴别能力较低,且无法预测MCI患者的临床进展。发现SPR分析与CSF AD生物标志物之间存在中度相关性。
qEEG的诊断和预后能力较低。SPR方法优于脑电图视觉分析。qEEG方法与CSF AD生物标志物相关性良好,提示与AD的病理改变有关。