Suppr超能文献

应用美国超声心动图学会/欧洲心血管影像学会 2016 年指南估计左心室充盈压的观察者间变异性。

Interobserver Variability in Applying American Society of Echocardiography/European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging 2016 Guidelines for Estimation of Left Ventricular Filling Pressure.

机构信息

Methodist DeBakey Heart and Vascular Center, Center for Outcomes Research, Houston Methodist Research Institute, TX (S.F.N., M.A.C.-p., K.C.E.t., J.X.).

Department of Medicine, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester (G.P.A., S.R.S.).

出版信息

Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019 Dec;12(1):e008122. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.118.008122.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Assessment of left ventricular (LV) filling pressure is among the important components of a comprehensive echocardiographic report. Previous studies noted wide limits of agreement using 2009 American Society of Echocardiography/European Association of Echocardiography guidelines, but reproducibility of 2016 guidelines update in estimating LV filling pressure is unknown.

METHODS

Echocardiographic and hemodynamic data were obtained from 50 patients undergoing cardiac catheterization for clinical indications. Clinical and echocardiographic findings but not invasive hemodynamics were provided to 4 groups of observers, including experienced echocardiographers and cardiology fellows. Invasively acquired LV filling pressure was the gold standard.

RESULTS

In group I of 8 experienced echocardiographers from the guidelines writing committee, sensitivity for elevated LV filling pressure was 92% for all observers, and specificity was 93±6%. Fleiss κ-value for the agreement in group I was 0.80. In group II of 4 fellows in training, sensitivity was 91±2%, and specificity was 95±2%. Fleiss κ-value for the agreement in group II was 0.94. In group III of 9 experienced echocardiographers who had not participated in drafting the guidelines, sensitivity was 88±5%, and specificity was 91±7%. Fleiss κ-value for the agreement in group III was 0.76. In group IV of 7 other fellows, sensitivity was 91±3%, and specificity was 92±5%. Fleiss κ-value for the agreement in group IV was 0.89.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a good level of agreement and accuracy in the estimation of LV filling pressure using the American Society of Echocardiography/European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging 2016 recommendations update, irrespective of the experience level of the observer.

摘要

背景

评估左心室(LV)充盈压是综合超声心动图报告的重要组成部分。先前的研究使用 2009 年美国超声心动图学会/欧洲心血管成像协会指南指出了广泛的一致性限制,但 2016 年指南更新在估计 LV 充盈压方面的可重复性尚不清楚。

方法

从 50 例因临床指征而行心导管检查的患者中获得超声心动图和血流动力学数据。为 4 组观察者提供临床和超声心动图发现,但不包括有创血流动力学,包括有经验的超声心动图医师和心脏病学研究员。有创获得的 LV 充盈压为金标准。

结果

在指南编写委员会的 8 名有经验的超声心动图医师组成的第 I 组中,所有观察者的 LV 充盈压升高的敏感性为 92%,特异性为 93±6%。第 I 组的 Fleiss κ 值为 0.80。在接受培训的 4 名研究员组成的第 II 组中,敏感性为 91±2%,特异性为 95±2%。第 II 组的 Fleiss κ 值为 0.94。在未参与起草指南的 9 名有经验的超声心动图医师组成的第 III 组中,敏感性为 88±5%,特异性为 91±7%。第 III 组的 Fleiss κ 值为 0.76。在其他 7 名研究员组成的第 IV 组中,敏感性为 91±3%,特异性为 92±5%。第 IV 组的 Fleiss κ 值为 0.89。

结论

使用美国超声心动图学会/欧洲心血管成像协会 2016 年更新的建议,无论观察者的经验水平如何,LV 充盈压的估计都具有良好的一致性和准确性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验