• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

产前保健中普遍进行丙型肝炎检测的短期效果和长期成本效益。

Short-Term Effects and Long-Term Cost-Effectiveness of Universal Hepatitis C Testing in Prenatal Care.

机构信息

Boston Medical Center, Section of Infectious Diseases, Boston, Massachusetts; the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Division of Viral Hepatitis, Atlanta, Georgia; Boston Medical Center, Section of Infectious Diseases, Section of Pediatric Infectious Diseases; and the Bureau of Infectious Disease and Laboratory Sciences, Massachusetts Department of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts; and Stanford University, Center for Health Policy and Center for Primary Care and Outcomes Research, Stanford, California.

出版信息

Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Feb;133(2):289-300. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003062.

DOI:10.1097/AOG.0000000000003062
PMID:30633134
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6501827/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the clinical effects and cost-effectiveness of universal prenatal hepatitis C screening, and to calculate potential life expectancy, quality of life, and health care costs associated with universal prenatal hepatitis C screening and linkage to treatment.

METHODS

Using a stochastic individual-level microsimulation model, we simulated the lifetimes of 250 million pregnant women matched at baseline with the U.S. childbearing population on age, injection drug use behaviors, and hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection status. Modeled outcomes included hepatitis C diagnosis, treatment and cure, lifetime health care costs, quality-adjusted life years (QALY) and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios comparing universal prenatal hepatitis C screening to current practice. We modeled whether neonates exposed to maternal HCV at birth were identified as such.

RESULTS

Pregnant women with hepatitis C infection lived 1.21 years longer and had 16% lower HCV-attributable mortality with universal prenatal hepatitis C screening, which had an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $41,000 per QALY gained compared with current practice. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios remained below $100,000 per QALY gained in most sensitivity analyses; notable exceptions included incremental cost-effectiveness ratios above $100,000 when assuming mean time to cirrhosis of 70 years, a cost greater than $500,000 per false positive diagnosis, or population HCV infection prevalence below 0.16%. Universal prenatal hepatitis C screening increased identification of neonates exposed to HCV at birth from 44% to 92%.

CONCLUSIONS

In our model, universal prenatal hepatitis C screening improves health outcomes in women with HCV infection, improves identification of HCV exposure in neonates born at risk, and is cost-effective.

摘要

目的

评估普遍产前丙型肝炎筛查的临床效果和成本效益,并计算普遍产前丙型肝炎筛查及与治疗相关的联系对潜在预期寿命、生活质量和医疗保健成本的影响。

方法

使用随机个体水平微观模拟模型,我们对 2.5 亿名孕妇的一生进行了模拟,这些孕妇在基线时按年龄、注射毒品行为和丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)感染状况与美国生育人口相匹配。模型结果包括丙型肝炎的诊断、治疗和治愈、终身医疗保健成本、质量调整生命年(QALY)和增量成本效益比,以比较普遍产前丙型肝炎筛查与当前实践。我们还对是否对出生时暴露于母体 HCV 的新生儿进行了识别进行了建模。

结果

感染 HCV 的孕妇的寿命延长了 1.21 年,与当前实践相比,HCV 归因死亡率降低了 16%,具有增量成本效益比为 41,000 美元/QALY。在大多数敏感性分析中,增量成本效益比仍低于 100,000 美元/QALY;值得注意的例外包括假设肝硬化的平均时间为 70 年、假阳性诊断的费用超过 500,000 美元或人群 HCV 感染率低于 0.16%时,增量成本效益比超过 100,000 美元/QALY。普遍产前丙型肝炎筛查使暴露于 HCV 的新生儿的识别率从 44%提高到 92%。

结论

在我们的模型中,普遍产前丙型肝炎筛查改善了 HCV 感染妇女的健康结果,提高了对有风险的新生儿 HCV 暴露的识别,并具有成本效益。

相似文献

1
Short-Term Effects and Long-Term Cost-Effectiveness of Universal Hepatitis C Testing in Prenatal Care.产前保健中普遍进行丙型肝炎检测的短期效果和长期成本效益。
Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Feb;133(2):289-300. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003062.
2
Universal Hepatitis B Antibody Screening and Vaccination in Pregnancy: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.孕期普遍进行乙型肝炎病毒抗体筛查和疫苗接种:成本效益分析。
Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Mar 1;139(3):357-367. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004652.
3
Cost Effectiveness of Universal Screening for Hepatitis C Virus Infection in the Era of Direct-Acting, Pangenotypic Treatment Regimens.直接作用、泛基因型治疗方案时代丙型肝炎病毒感染普遍筛查的成本效益。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 Apr;17(5):930-939.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2018.08.080. Epub 2018 Sep 8.
4
Long-term effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of screening for hepatitis C virus infection.丙型肝炎病毒感染筛查的长期有效性和成本效益
Eur J Public Health. 2009 Jun;19(3):245-53. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckp001. Epub 2009 Feb 5.
5
Healthcare value of implementing hepatitis C screening in the adult general population in Spain.在西班牙成年人一般人群中实施丙型肝炎筛查的医疗保健价值。
PLoS One. 2018 Nov 28;13(11):e0208036. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0208036. eCollection 2018.
6
The cost-effectiveness of testing for hepatitis C in former injecting drug users.对曾经注射吸毒者进行丙型肝炎检测的成本效益分析。
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Sep;10(32):iii-iv, ix-xii, 1-93. doi: 10.3310/hta10320.
7
Routine screening for hepatitis C in pregnancy is cost-effective in a large urban population in Ireland: a retrospective study.在爱尔兰的一个大城市人群中,对妊娠女性进行常规丙型肝炎筛查具有成本效益:一项回顾性研究。
BJOG. 2022 Jan;129(2):322-327. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.16984. Epub 2021 Nov 20.
8
Cost-effectiveness of Universal and Targeted Hepatitis C Virus Screening in the United States.美国普遍和靶向性丙型肝炎病毒筛查的成本效益分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Sep 1;3(9):e2015756. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.15756.
9
Cost-effective screening for acute hepatitis C virus infection in HIV-infected men who have sex with men.对男男性行为人群中 HIV 感染者进行急性丙型肝炎病毒感染的成本效益筛查。
Clin Infect Dis. 2012 Jul;55(2):279-90. doi: 10.1093/cid/cis382. Epub 2012 Apr 4.
10
Cost-effectiveness of Universal Hepatitis C Virus Screening of Pregnant Women in the United States.美国孕妇普遍进行丙型肝炎病毒筛查的成本效益
Clin Infect Dis. 2019 Nov 13;69(11):1888-1895. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciz063.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical- and Cost-Effectiveness of Liver Disease Staging in Hepatitis C Virus Infection: A Microsimulation Study.丙型肝炎病毒感染中肝病分期的临床及成本效益:一项微观模拟研究
Clin Infect Dis. 2025 Feb 24;80(2):300-313. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciae485.
2
Feasibility and Acceptability of Antenatal Hepatitis C Screening: A Pilot Study.产前丙型肝炎筛查的可行性和可接受性:一项试点研究。
Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2024 Aug 27;2024:7696410. doi: 10.1155/2024/7696410. eCollection 2024.
3
Benefits and harms of antenatal and newborn screening programmes in health economic assessments: the VALENTIA systematic review and qualitative investigation.产前和新生儿筛查计划在健康经济评估中的获益和危害:VALENTIA 系统评价和定性研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2024 Jun;28(25):1-180. doi: 10.3310/PYTK6591.
4
Hepatitis C virus detection and management after implementation of universal screening in pregnancy.孕期实施普遍筛查后丙型肝炎病毒的检测与管理
AJOG Glob Rep. 2024 Feb 8;4(1):100317. doi: 10.1016/j.xagr.2024.100317. eCollection 2024 Feb.
5
Maternal hepatitis C virus infection and three adverse maternal outcomes in the United States.美国丙型肝炎病毒感染的产妇与三种不良产妇结局。
PLoS One. 2023 Oct 18;18(10):e0291994. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0291994. eCollection 2023.
6
Maternal Hepatitis C Virus Infection and Adverse Newborn Outcomes in the US.美国丙型肝炎病毒感染产妇与新生儿不良结局
Matern Child Health J. 2023 Aug;27(8):1343-1351. doi: 10.1007/s10995-023-03666-9. Epub 2023 May 22.
7
Evidence for Implementation: HIV/HCV Coinfection and Pregnancy.实施证据:HIV/HCV 合并感染与妊娠。
Curr HIV/AIDS Rep. 2023 Feb;20(1):1-8. doi: 10.1007/s11904-022-00643-9. Epub 2023 Jan 18.
8
Delaware and Hepatitis C:: Is it time for universal screening?特拉华州与丙型肝炎:是时候进行普遍筛查了吗?
Dela J Public Health. 2019 May 28;5(2):46-47. doi: 10.32481/djph.2019.05.008. eCollection 2019 May.
9
Prospective cohort study of children exposed to hepatitis C virus through a pregnancy screening program.前瞻性队列研究:通过妊娠筛查计划暴露于丙型肝炎病毒的儿童。
Int J Infect Dis. 2021 Sep;110:62-68. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2021.07.019. Epub 2021 Jul 14.
10
Prenatal hepatitis C screening, diagnoses, and follow-up testing in British Columbia, 2008-2019.2008-2019 年不列颠哥伦比亚省产前丙型肝炎筛查、诊断和随访检测。
PLoS One. 2020 Dec 31;15(12):e0244575. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244575. eCollection 2020.

本文引用的文献

1
Hepatitis C Virus in Women of Childbearing Age, Pregnant Women, and Children.丙型肝炎病毒在育龄妇女、孕妇和儿童中的流行情况。
Am J Prev Med. 2018 Nov;55(5):633-641. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2018.05.029.
2
Universal Screening of Pregnant Women for Hepatitis C: The Time Is Now.对孕妇进行丙型肝炎普遍筛查:现在是时候了。
Clin Infect Dis. 2018 Oct 30;67(10):1493-1497. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciy586.
3
Cost Effectiveness of Universal Screening for Hepatitis C Virus Infection in the Era of Direct-Acting, Pangenotypic Treatment Regimens.直接作用、泛基因型治疗方案时代丙型肝炎病毒感染普遍筛查的成本效益。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 Apr;17(5):930-939.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2018.08.080. Epub 2018 Sep 8.
4
Discounting in Economic Evaluations.经济性评价中的折扣
Pharmacoeconomics. 2018 Jul;36(7):745-758. doi: 10.1007/s40273-018-0672-z.
5
Risk-Based Hepatitis C Screening in Pregnancy Is Less Reliable Than Universal Screening: A Retrospective Chart Review.基于风险的孕期丙型肝炎筛查不如普遍筛查可靠:一项回顾性图表审查。
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2018 Feb 17;5(3):ofy043. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofy043. eCollection 2018 Mar.
6
Population-level Outcomes and Cost-Effectiveness of Expanding the Recommendation for Age-based Hepatitis C Testing in the United States.美国扩大基于年龄的丙型肝炎检测建议的人群水平结果和成本效益。
Clin Infect Dis. 2018 Aug 1;67(4):549-556. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciy098.
7
Increases in Acute Hepatitis C Virus Infection Related to a Growing Opioid Epidemic and Associated Injection Drug Use, United States, 2004 to 2014.2004 年至 2014 年美国与阿片类药物流行及相关注射吸毒相关的急性丙型肝炎病毒感染增加。
Am J Public Health. 2018 Feb;108(2):175-181. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2017.304132. Epub 2017 Dec 21.
8
Diagnostic accuracy of tests to detect Hepatitis C antibody: a meta-analysis and review of the literature.检测丙型肝炎抗体的试验的诊断准确性:一项荟萃分析及文献综述
BMC Infect Dis. 2017 Nov 1;17(Suppl 1):695. doi: 10.1186/s12879-017-2773-2.
9
Cost-Effectiveness of One-Time Hepatitis C Screening Strategies Among Adolescents and Young Adults in Primary Care Settings.一次性丙型肝炎筛查策略在初级保健环境中青少年和年轻成人中的成本效益。
Clin Infect Dis. 2018 Jan 18;66(3):376-384. doi: 10.1093/cid/cix798.
10
Opioid Drug Use and Acute Cardiac Events Among Pregnant Women in the United States.美国孕妇中的阿片类药物使用与急性心脏事件
Am J Med. 2018 Jan;131(1):64-71.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2017.07.023. Epub 2017 Aug 12.