• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

主动脉瓣狭窄患者带支架异种移植物的主动脉根部置换。

Aortic root replacement with stentless xenografts in patients with aortic stenosis.

机构信息

Division of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh.

Division of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh; Heart and Vascular Institute, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pa.

出版信息

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2019 Oct;158(4):1021-1027. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2018.11.028. Epub 2018 Nov 23.

DOI:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2018.11.028
PMID:30635191
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Stentless bioprosthetic valves such as the Freestyle conduit have been widely used as an option for aortic root replacement in the setting of aortic root aneurysms with acceptable long-term outcomes. However, there is a paucity of data regarding the use of the Freestyle prosthesis in patients with aortic stenosis.

METHODS

All patients with a primary diagnosis of severe aortic stenosis who underwent complete aortic root replacement with Freestyle conduits were included. Primary outcomes included survival and readmissions for heart failure. Secondary outcomes included immediate postoperative complications.

RESULTS

In total, 2529 patients with severe aortic stenosis who needed an open aortic valve replacement with a biological prosthesis were operated on between 2011 and 2017. Of these, 294 patients underwent aortic root replacements using the Freestyle conduit with a primary diagnosis of native or prosthetic aortic stenosis. Eighty-four (28.6%) of the patients underwent reoperative sternotomy. The majority (53.7%) of the cohort were men. The mean age was 67.5 ± 13.0 years. Mean Society of Thoracic Surgeons Predicted Risk of Mortality when calculated with the assumption of aortic valve replacement ± coronary artery bypass grafting was 8.10% ± 10.8. The median follow-up time for the entire group was 2.7 years (interquartile range 0.9-4.5 years). Operative (30-day) mortality was 7.1% (n = 21). Kaplan-Meier mortality estimates at 1 and 5 years are 16.6% and 27.6%, respectively. Mean gradients were 7.15 ± 4.47 mm Hg at 1 month and 6.32 ± 4.76 mm Hg at 1 year. Readmissions for heart failure at 30 days, 1 year, and 5 years were 5.6%, 11.8%, and 17.4%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Aortic root replacement using Freestyle bioprostheses is a viable option for patients with severe aortic stenosis with low risk of hospital readmission for heart failure.

摘要

目的

无支架生物瓣,如 Freestyle 管道,已被广泛用作治疗主动脉根部瘤合并主动脉瓣狭窄患者的主动脉根部置换术的选择之一,具有可接受的长期结果。然而,关于 Freestyle 假体在主动脉瓣狭窄患者中的应用的数据很少。

方法

所有因严重主动脉瓣狭窄而接受 Freestyle 管道行主动脉根部置换术的患者均被纳入本研究。主要结局包括生存和因心力衰竭再入院。次要结局包括术后即刻并发症。

结果

2011 年至 2017 年间,共有 2529 例严重主动脉瓣狭窄患者接受生物瓣主动脉瓣置换术,其中 294 例行 Freestyle 管道主动脉根部置换术,其主要诊断为原发性或人工主动脉瓣狭窄。84 例(28.6%)患者行再次正中开胸术。队列中大多数(53.7%)患者为男性。平均年龄为 67.5±13.0 岁。平均胸外科医生协会预测死亡率(当假设行主动脉瓣置换术+冠状动脉旁路移植术时)为 8.10%±10.8。全组中位随访时间为 2.7 年(四分位距 0.9-4.5 年)。全组手术(30 天)死亡率为 7.1%(n=21)。Kaplan-Meier 1 年和 5 年死亡率估计值分别为 16.6%和 27.6%。1 个月时平均梯度为 7.15±4.47mmHg,1 年时为 6.32±4.76mmHg。30 天、1 年和 5 年因心力衰竭再入院率分别为 5.6%、11.8%和 17.4%。

结论

对于主动脉瓣狭窄风险低、因心力衰竭再入院风险低的患者,使用 Freestyle 生物瓣行主动脉根部置换术是一种可行的选择。

相似文献

1
Aortic root replacement with stentless xenografts in patients with aortic stenosis.主动脉瓣狭窄患者带支架异种移植物的主动脉根部置换。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2019 Oct;158(4):1021-1027. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2018.11.028. Epub 2018 Nov 23.
2
Full-root aortic valve replacement with stentless xenograft achieves superior regression of left ventricular hypertrophy compared to pericardial stented aortic valves.与心包带支架主动脉瓣相比,采用无支架异种移植物进行全根主动脉瓣置换可使左心室肥厚得到更显著的消退。
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2015 Feb 3;10:15. doi: 10.1186/s13019-015-0219-8.
3
Medtronic Freestyle aortic bioprosthesis: a potential option for haemodialysis patients†.美敦力自由式主动脉生物假体:血液透析患者的一个潜在选择†
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2016 Apr;22(4):459-63; discussion 463-4. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivv388. Epub 2016 Jan 19.
4
Midterm outcome after aortic root replacement with stentless porcine bioprostheses.无支架猪生物瓣主动脉根部替换术后中期结果。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2011 Aug;40(2):429-34. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2010.12.010. Epub 2011 Jan 28.
5
Root replacement with stentless Freestyle bioprostheses for active endocarditis: a single centre experience.使用无支架Freestyle生物假体进行根部置换治疗活动性心内膜炎:单中心经验
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2013 Jan;16(1):27-30. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivs438. Epub 2012 Oct 26.
6
Long Term Outcomes of Freestyle Stentless Aortic Bioprosthesis: A Single Center Experience.自由式无支架主动脉生物假体的长期疗效:单中心经验
Heart Surg Forum. 2020 Feb 10;23(1):E034-E038. doi: 10.1532/hsf.2661.
7
Use of stentless xenografts in the aortic position: determinants of early and late outcome.无支架异种移植物在主动脉位置的应用:早期和晚期结果的决定因素
Ann Thorac Surg. 2002 Nov;74(5):1450-7; discussion 1457-8. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(02)03845-6.
8
Aortic Valve Reoperation After Stentless Bioprosthesis: Short- and Long-Term Outcomes.无支架生物瓣再次主动脉瓣置换:短期和长期结果。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2018 Aug;106(2):521-525. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2018.02.073. Epub 2018 Apr 3.
9
Long-term results of Freestyle stentless bioprosthesis in the aortic position: a single-center prospective cohort of 500 patients.主动脉位置的Freestyle无支架生物假体的长期结果:500例患者的单中心前瞻性队列研究
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014 Nov;148(5):1903-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2014.02.063. Epub 2014 Feb 26.
10
Aortic root surgery in the United States: a report from the Society of Thoracic Surgeons database.美国主动脉根部手术:胸外科医生协会数据库的报告。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015 Jan;149(1):116-22.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2014.05.042. Epub 2014 May 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Freestyle aortic root prosthesis in combination with aortic replacement and open anastomosis: a retrospective analysis.采用主动脉根部游离移植物行主动脉置换及开放式吻合术:回顾性分析。
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2021 Jun 26;16(1):185. doi: 10.1186/s13019-021-01562-3.