Department of Radiology, Université Laval, Québec, Canada.
Centre CERVO, Institut universitaire de santé mentale de Québec, Québec, Canada.
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2019 Feb;49(2):456-465. doi: 10.1002/jmri.26197. Epub 2018 Sep 17.
Harmonized protocols to collect imaging data must be devised, employed, and maintained in multicentric studies to reduce interscanner variability in subsequent analyses.
To present a standardized protocol for multicentric research on dementia linked to neurodegeneration in aging, harmonized on all three major vendor platforms. The protocol includes a common procedure for qualification, quality control, and quality assurance and feasibility in large-scale studies.
Prospective.
The study involved a geometric phantom, a single individual volunteer, and 143 cognitively healthy, mild cognitively impaired, and Alzheimer's disease participants in a large-scale, multicentric study.
FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCES: MRI was perform with 3T scanners (GE, Philips, Siemens) and included 3D T w, PD/T w, , T w-FLAIR, diffusion, and BOLD resting state acquisitions.
Measures included signal- and contrast-to-noise ratios (SNR and CNR, respectively), total brain volumes, and total scan time.
SNR, CNR, and scan time were compared between scanner vendors using analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey tests, while brain volumes were tested using linear mixed models.
Geometric phantom T w SNR was significantly (P < 0.001) higher in Philips (mean: 71.4) than Siemens (29.5), while no significant difference was observed between vendors for T w (32.0 and 37.2, respectively, P = 0.243). Single individual volunteer T w CNR was higher in subcortical regions for Siemens (P < 0.001), while Philips had higher cortical CNR (P = 0.044). No significant difference in brain volumes was observed between vendors (P = 0.310/0.582/0.055). The average scan time was 41.0 minutes (SD: 2.8) and was not significantly different between sites (P = 0.071) and cognitive groups (P = 0.853).
The harmonized Canadian Dementia Imaging Protocol suits the needs of studies that need to ensure quality MRI data acquisition for the measurement of brain changes across adulthood, due to aging, neurodegeneration, and other etiologies. A detailed description, exam cards, and operators' manual are freely available at the following site: www.cdip-pcid.ca.
2 Technical Efficacy: Stage 2 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2019;49:456-465.
为了减少后续分析中的扫描仪间变异性,必须设计、采用和维护多中心研究中的协调协议来收集成像数据。
提出一个针对与衰老相关的神经退行性变所致痴呆的多中心研究的标准化协议,在所有三个主要供应商平台上进行协调。该协议包括在大规模研究中进行资格认证、质量控制和质量保证的通用程序。
前瞻性。
这项研究涉及一个几何体模、一个个体志愿者以及 143 名认知健康、轻度认知障碍和阿尔茨海默病患者,他们参加了一项大型多中心研究。
磁场强度/序列:使用 3T 扫描仪(GE、Philips、Siemens)进行 MRI,包括 3D T w、PD/T w、T w-FLAIR、弥散和 BOLD 静息状态采集。
测量包括信噪比(SNR)和对比噪声比(CNR)、总脑容量和总扫描时间。
使用方差分析(ANOVA)和 Tukey 检验比较扫描仪供应商之间的 SNR、CNR 和扫描时间,而使用线性混合模型测试脑容量。
几何体模 T w SNR 在飞利浦(平均值:71.4)中明显(P < 0.001)高于西门子(29.5),而在 T w 中,供应商之间没有观察到显著差异(分别为 32.0 和 37.2,P = 0.243)。个体志愿者 T w CNR 在西门子的皮质下区域较高(P < 0.001),而飞利浦的皮质 CNR 较高(P = 0.044)。在供应商之间没有观察到脑容量的显著差异(P = 0.310/0.582/0.055)。平均扫描时间为 41.0 分钟(SD:2.8),站点之间(P = 0.071)和认知组之间(P = 0.853)没有显著差异。
由于老化、神经退行性变和其他病因导致的成年后大脑变化的测量,需要确保 MRI 数据采集的质量,因此,协调的加拿大痴呆成像协议符合研究的需求。详细描述、检查卡和操作员手册可在以下网站免费获得:www.cdip-pcid.ca。
2 技术功效:第 2 阶段 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2019;49:456-465.