School of Psychology and Public Health, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Centre for Mental Health, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Int J Eat Disord. 2019 Feb;52(2):121-131. doi: 10.1002/eat.22992. Epub 2019 Jan 12.
To evaluate Confident Body, Confident Child (CBCC), a universal parenting resource designed to promote positive body image and healthy eating patterns in children aged 2-6 years, at 6- and 12-months follow-up.
A four-arm randomized controlled trial with 345 parents was conducted. Group (A) received the CBCC resource pack + workshop, (B) received the CBCC resource pack only, (C) received a nutrition booklet and (D) received no interventions until all questionnaires were completed (i.e., waitlist control). Measures of parenting variables relevant to child body image and eating patterns, and parent-report of child weight, were administered at baseline, 6-weeks post-intervention (results reported previously), and 6- and 12-months follow-up.
Mixed effects modeling comparing group averages over time revealed that significant group differences on measures of knowledge, parenting intentions and the parental feeding practice of weight restriction were still present at 12-months follow-up, though the remaining measures showed no significant differences between groups over time. The two CBCC groups reported more positive and less negative outcomes than the nutrition booklet active control.
The CBCC program achieved sustained improvements in some parenting variables at 12-months, suggesting its value as an effective parenting intervention. Changes to the intervention design, such as the addition of a follow-up parent workshop, however, would likely increase its efficacy.
评估适用于 2-6 岁儿童的通用育儿资源“自信宝贝,健康儿童”(CBCC),以在 6 个月和 12 个月的随访中评价其对儿童积极身体意象和健康饮食模式的促进效果。
这是一项包含 345 名父母的四臂随机对照试验。组(A)接受 CBCC 资源包+研讨会,组(B)仅接受 CBCC 资源包,组(C)接受营养手册,组(D)在完成所有问卷前(即等待对照组)不接受任何干预。在基线、干预后 6 周(先前报道结果)和 6 个月及 12 个月随访时,评估与儿童身体意象和饮食模式相关的育儿变量以及家长报告的儿童体重。
混合效应模型比较组间随时间的平均差异显示,在 12 个月随访时,知识、育儿意向和父母喂养实践中的体重限制方面仍存在显著的组间差异,但其余措施在组间随时间无显著差异。两个 CBCC 组报告的积极结果多于消极结果,优于营养手册积极对照组。
CBCC 计划在 12 个月时实现了一些育儿变量的持续改善,表明其作为一种有效的育儿干预措施具有价值。然而,通过改变干预设计,例如增加后续的家长研讨会,可能会提高其效果。