• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

准备情况和互助关系影响机械循环支持患者及其照顾者的生活质量。

Preparedness and Mutuality Affect Quality of Life for Patients With Mechanical Circulatory Support and Their Caregivers.

作者信息

Magasi Susan, Buono Sarah, Yancy Clyde W, Ramirez Ricardo D, Grady Kathleen L

机构信息

Department of Occupational Therapy and Department of Disability Studies, University of Illinois at Chicago (S.M.).

Department of Medical Social Sciences (S.B.), Northwestern University, Chicago, IL.

出版信息

Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2019 Jan;12(1):e004414. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.117.004414.

DOI:10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.117.004414
PMID:30636480
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Clinical and US regulatory guidelines for patients with mechanical circulatory support (MCS) require the identification of a caregiver to assist with MCS care. There is limited understanding of the impact of MCS caregiving on patients and caregivers. The purpose of this study was to examine how living with MCS affects the quality of life (QoL) of patients and their caregivers through the lens of preparedness and mutuality.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The sample included 30 MCS patients and their caregivers. Semistructured qualitative interviews about factors contributing to QoL were conducted with patients and caregivers and analyzed using a 2-phase thematic process. Caregiving impacts QoL of MCS patients and their caregivers long term. When there was limited time to engage in decision-making about MCS implantation, people entered MCS caregiving relationships naive to its full demands. Although most people adjusted to the task demands, MCS caregiving had a significant impact, both positive and negative, on interpersonal relationships. We applied the concepts of preparedness and mutuality to help frame the understanding of the emergent themes of forced choice, adjustment, gratitude, relationship change, strain, and burden (both caregiver and patient perceived). Availability of networks of support was identified as a crucial resource.

CONCLUSIONS

MCS caregiving affects QoL for both patients and caregivers. Specifically, preparedness, mutuality, and availability of supportive networks influence QoL of MCS patients and their caregivers. Caregiving relationships change over time. Long-term support by the MCS clinical team can help ensure that physical and emotional needs of MCS patients and caregivers are identified and addressed.

摘要

背景

机械循环支持(MCS)患者的临床和美国监管指南要求确定一名护理人员来协助进行MCS护理。目前对于MCS护理对患者和护理人员的影响了解有限。本研究的目的是通过准备度和相互性的视角,探讨与MCS共同生活如何影响患者及其护理人员的生活质量(QoL)。

方法与结果

样本包括30名MCS患者及其护理人员。对患者和护理人员进行了关于影响生活质量因素的半结构化定性访谈,并采用两阶段主题分析方法进行分析。护理长期影响MCS患者及其护理人员的生活质量。当参与MCS植入决策的时间有限时,人们在对MCS护理的全部要求缺乏了解的情况下进入护理关系。尽管大多数人适应了任务要求,但MCS护理对人际关系产生了重大的积极和消极影响。我们应用准备度和相互性的概念来帮助构建对强制选择、调整、感恩、关系变化、压力和负担(护理人员和患者均感知到)等新出现主题的理解。支持网络的可用性被确定为一项关键资源。

结论

MCS护理影响患者和护理人员的生活质量。具体而言,准备度、相互性和支持网络的可用性影响MCS患者及其护理人员的生活质量。护理关系随时间变化。MCS临床团队的长期支持有助于确保识别并满足MCS患者及其护理人员的身体和情感需求。

相似文献

1
Preparedness and Mutuality Affect Quality of Life for Patients With Mechanical Circulatory Support and Their Caregivers.准备情况和互助关系影响机械循环支持患者及其照顾者的生活质量。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2019 Jan;12(1):e004414. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.117.004414.
2
Decision-making for destination therapy left ventricular assist devices: implications for caregivers.目标治疗左心室辅助装置的决策:对护理人员的影响。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2015 Mar;8(2):172-8. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.114.001276. Epub 2015 Mar 10.
3
Patient and Caregiver Determinants of Patient Quality of Life and Caregiver Strain in Left Ventricular Assist Device Therapy.左心室辅助装置治疗中患者生活质量和照顾者负担的患者和照顾者决定因素。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2018 Mar 7;7(6):e008080. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.008080.
4
Mutuality and preparedness moderate the effects of caregiving demand on cancer family caregiver outcomes.相互性和准备状态调节了照顾需求对癌症家庭照顾者结果的影响。
Nurs Res. 2007 Nov-Dec;56(6):425-33. doi: 10.1097/01.NNR.0000299852.75300.03.
5
Effects of caregiving demand, mutuality, and preparedness on family caregiver outcomes during cancer treatment.癌症治疗期间照护需求、相互性和准备情况对家庭照护者结局的影响。
Oncol Nurs Forum. 2008 Jan;35(1):49-56. doi: 10.1188/08.ONF.49-56.
6
Influence of preparedness on anxiety, depression, and quality of life in caregivers of heart failure patients: Testing a model of path analysis.准备程度对心力衰竭患者照顾者焦虑、抑郁和生活质量的影响:路径分析模型检验。
Patient Educ Couns. 2019 May;102(5):1021-1028. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2018.12.027. Epub 2018 Dec 28.
7
Enhancing the cancer caregiving experience: Building resilience through role adjustment and mutuality.增强癌症患者照护体验:通过角色调整和相互依存建立韧性。
Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2019 Dec;43:101663. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2019.09.004. Epub 2019 Sep 10.
8
Stress and Coping Among Family Caregivers of Patients With a Destination Therapy Left Ventricular Assist Device: A Multicenter Mixed Methods Study.患者使用目的地治疗左心室辅助装置的家庭护理人员的压力和应对方式:一项多中心混合方法研究。
Circ Heart Fail. 2021 Oct;14(10):e008243. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.120.008243. Epub 2021 Sep 1.
9
Use of the resiliency model of family stress, adjustment and adaptation in the analysis of family caregiver reaction among families of older people with congestive heart failure.运用家庭压力、调整和适应的恢复力模型分析充血性心力衰竭老年人家庭的家庭照顾者反应。
Int J Older People Nurs. 2012 Jun;7(2):117-26. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-3743.2011.00275.x. Epub 2011 Apr 8.
10
Perceived Stress and Depressive Symptoms as Predictors of Decisional Conflict in Dyads Considering a Left Ventricular Assist Device.将左心室辅助装置作为考虑因素时,感知压力和抑郁症状作为二元组决策冲突的预测因素。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2020 Mar;13(3):e006155. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.119.006155. Epub 2020 Mar 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Associations between dyadic coping, mutuality, and quality of life among maintenance hemodialysis patients and caregivers: an actor-partner interdependence mediation model.维持性血液透析患者及其照顾者的二元应对、相互性与生活质量之间的关联:一种行为者-伙伴相互依赖中介模型
Qual Life Res. 2025 Jun 17. doi: 10.1007/s11136-025-03991-2.
2
Why Is Social Reintegration Support for Patients With Left Ventricular Assist Device Necessary?为什么对左心室辅助装置患者进行社会重新融入支持是必要的?
Circ Rep. 2025 Feb 21;7(3):147-153. doi: 10.1253/circrep.CR-25-0004. eCollection 2025 Mar 10.
3
Psychometric Testing of the Mutuality Scale in Patients and Caregiver Dyads After the Onset of Coronary Heart Disease.
冠心病发作后患者与照顾者二元组中相互性量表的心理测量测试
Res Nurs Health. 2025 Apr;48(2):222-233. doi: 10.1002/nur.22443. Epub 2025 Feb 8.
4
Communicating visit information to family caregivers: How does method matter? A national survey.向家庭护理人员传达就诊信息:方法为何重要?一项全国性调查。
Palliat Support Care. 2024 Apr 24:1-8. doi: 10.1017/S1478951524000427.
5
Screening for Emotional Distress in Patients with Cardiovascular Disease.心血管疾病患者的情绪困扰筛查
Curr Cardiol Rep. 2023 Oct;25(10):1165-1174. doi: 10.1007/s11886-023-01936-0. Epub 2023 Aug 23.
6
The role of critical care nurses in shared decision-making for patients with severe heart failure: A qualitative study.重症监护护士在重症心力衰竭患者共同决策中的作用:一项定性研究。
PLoS One. 2023 Jul 20;18(7):e0288978. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0288978. eCollection 2023.
7
Change in Caregiver Health-Related Quality of Life From Before to Early After Surgery: SUSTAIN-IT Study.手术前后照料者健康相关生活质量的变化:SUSTAIN-IT 研究。
Circ Heart Fail. 2023 Aug;16(8):e010038. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.122.010038. Epub 2023 Jun 22.
8
Left Ventricular Assist Device as a Destination Therapy: Current Situation and the Importance of Patient Selection.作为终末期治疗的左心室辅助装置:现状及患者选择的重要性
Life (Basel). 2023 Apr 21;13(4):1065. doi: 10.3390/life13041065.
9
"The heart in a bag": The lived experience of patient-caregiver dyads with left ventricular assist device during cardiac rehabilitation.“袋中之心”:心脏康复期间左心室辅助装置患者-照顾者二元组的生活体验
Front Psychol. 2023 Mar 10;14:1116739. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1116739. eCollection 2023.
10
Association Between Caregiver Burden and Patient Recovery After Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation: Insights From Sustaining Quality of Life of the Aged: Heart Transplant or Mechanical Support.左心室辅助装置植入后照顾者负担与患者康复的关系:来自维持老年患者生活质量:心脏移植或机械支持的研究结果。
J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2023;38(3):237-246. doi: 10.1097/JCN.0000000000000972. Epub 2023 Apr 4.