Schumacher Karen L, Stewart Barbara J, Archbold Patricia G, Caparro Mildred, Mutale Faith, Agrawal Sangeeta
College of Nursing, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, USA.
Oncol Nurs Forum. 2008 Jan;35(1):49-56. doi: 10.1188/08.ONF.49-56.
PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES: To test a model of family caregiving derived from the interactionist approach to role theory that hypothesized that three caregiving role implementation variables (caregiving demand, mutuality between caregivers and patients, and preparedness for caregiving) would predict multiple caregiving-specific and generic outcomes with different patterns of association across outcomes.
Descriptive, correlational.
Surgical, radiation, and medical oncology settings.
87 family caregivers of adults receiving treatment for solid tumors or lymphoma.
Caregivers completed the Demand and Difficulty subscales of the Caregiving Burden Scale; the Mutuality, Preparedness, and Global Strain scales of the Family Care Inventory; and the 30-item short form of the Profile of Mood States. Data were analyzed with simultaneous multiple regression.
Caregiving demand, mutuality, preparedness, caregiving difficulty, global caregiver strain, tension, depression, anger, fatigue, vigor, confusion, and total mood disturbance.
The model explained statistically significant proportions of variance in each outcome, with different patterns of association across outcomes. Demand was associated most strongly with caregiving difficulty and global strain. Mutuality was associated most strongly with caregiver anger. Unexpectedly, preparedness was associated more strongly with mood disturbance outcomes than with the caregiving-specific variables of difficulty and strain.
Further research should explore models that address implementation of the caregiving role to better elucidate how family caregivers learn and carry out the important role.
Clinical assessment should include caregiving demand, the quality of the relationship between caregiver and patient, and preparedness for caregiving. Interventions could be tailored to meet caregiver needs in each area.
目的/目标:检验一个源自角色理论互动主义方法的家庭护理模型,该模型假设三个护理角色实施变量(护理需求、护理者与患者之间的相互性以及护理准备情况)将以不同的关联模式预测多个特定于护理的结果和一般结果。
描述性、相关性研究。
外科、放射和医学肿瘤学环境。
87名成年实体瘤或淋巴瘤患者的家庭护理者。
护理者完成护理负担量表的需求和困难分量表;家庭护理量表的相互性、准备情况和总体压力量表;以及情绪状态剖面图30项简表。数据采用同时多元回归分析。
护理需求、相互性、准备情况、护理困难、护理者总体压力、紧张、抑郁、愤怒、疲劳、活力、困惑和总体情绪困扰。
该模型在统计学上解释了每个结果中显著比例的方差,且各结果的关联模式不同。需求与护理困难和总体压力的关联最为强烈。相互性与护理者愤怒的关联最为强烈。出乎意料的是,准备情况与情绪困扰结果的关联比与护理特定变量困难和压力的关联更强。
进一步的研究应探索解决护理角色实施问题的模型,以更好地阐明家庭护理者如何学习并履行这一重要角色。
临床评估应包括护理需求、护理者与患者之间关系的质量以及护理准备情况。干预措施可根据每个领域护理者的需求进行调整。