De Bianchedi E T, Scalozub De Boschan L, De Cortiñas L P, De Piccolo E G
Int J Psychoanal. 1988;69 ( Pt 3):359-68.
This paper presents a comparative study of the theories on anxiety formulated by Freud and Melanie Klein, with particular emphasis on the questions of its origin, its meaning for the individual and its function in both theoretical systems. The purpose of this comparative analysis is to offer an instrument which helps frame the theoretical discussions in psychoanalysis in an epistemological context. The authors hold that for Freud anxiety is considered as one more amongst the various manifestations of mental life, which his general theories try to explain, whereas for Melanie Klein anxiety and its destinies occupies a central place in her theories on mental functioning. The differences in both theories, which the authors of this paper describe, especially as to origin, function and meaning of anxiety, respond partially to the different metapsychological points of view with which both authors focus mental life--points of view which they have themselves investigated in a previous paper.
本文对弗洛伊德和梅兰妮·克莱因提出的焦虑理论进行了比较研究，特别强调了焦虑的起源问题、其对个体的意义以及在这两个理论体系中的作用。这种比较分析的目的是提供一种工具，有助于在认识论背景下构建精神分析中的理论讨论。作者认为，对弗洛伊德而言，焦虑被视为精神生活各种表现形式中的一种，他的一般理论试图对其进行解释；而对梅兰妮·克莱因来说，焦虑及其发展在她的心理功能理论中占据核心地位。本文作者所描述的这两种理论的差异，尤其是在焦虑的起源、功能和意义方面，部分反映了两位作者关注精神生活的不同元心理学观点——这些观点他们在之前的一篇论文中已各自进行了研究。
