Suppr超能文献

重建后肠道行内镜逆行胰胆管造影术时穿孔的危险因素。

Risk factors for perforation during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in post-reconstruction intestinal tract.

作者信息

Takano Shinichi, Fukasawa Mitsuharu, Shindo Hiroko, Takahashi Ei, Hirose Sumio, Fukasawa Yoshimitsu, Kawakami Satoshi, Hayakawa Hiroshi, Yokomichi Hiroshi, Kadokura Makoto, Sato Tadashi, Enomoto Nobuyuki

机构信息

First Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Yamanashi, Yamanashi 409-3898, Japan.

Department of Health Sciences, Interdisciplinary Graduate School and Engineering, University of Yamanashi, Yamanashi 409-3898, Japan.

出版信息

World J Clin Cases. 2019 Jan 6;7(1):10-18. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v7.i1.10.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in patients with surgically altered anatomy has been a major challenge to gastrointestinal endoscopists with low success rates for reaching the target site as well as high complication rates. The knowledge of ERCP-related risk factors is important for reducing unexpected complications.

AIM

To identify ERCP-related risk factors for perforation in patients with surgically altered anatomy.

METHODS

The medical records of 187 patients with surgically altered anatomy who underwent ERCP at our institution between April 2009 and December 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. An analysis of patient data, including age, sex, type of reconstruction, cause of surgery, aim of ERCP, success rate of reaching target site, success rate of procedure, adverse events, type of scope, time to reach the target site, and duration of procedure, was performed. In patients with Billroth-II reconstruction, additional potential risk factors were the shape of the inserted scope and whether the anastomosis was antecolic or retrocolic.

RESULTS

All patients ( 187) had surgical anatomy, such as Billroth-I ( 22), Billroth-II ( 33), Roux-en-Y ( 54), Child, or Whipple reconstruction ( 75). ERCP was performed for biliary drainage in 43 cases (23%), stone removal in 29 cases (16%), and stricture dilation of anastomosis in 59 cases (32%). The scope was unable to reach the target site in 17 cases (9%), and an aimed procedure could not be accomplished in 54 cases (29%). Adverse events were pancreatitis (3%), hyperamylasemia (10%), cholangitis (6%), cholestasis (4%), excessive sedation (1%), perforation (2%), and others (3%). Perforation occurred in three cases, all of which were in patients with Billroth-II reconstruction; in these patients, further analysis revealed loop-shaped insertion of the scope to be a significant risk for perforation ( = 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Risk factors for perforation during ERCP in patients with surgically altered anatomy were Billroth-II reconstruction and looping of the scope during Billroth-II procedure.

摘要

背景

对于解剖结构已手术改变的患者,内镜逆行胰胆管造影术(ERCP)一直是胃肠内镜医师面临的重大挑战,到达目标部位的成功率低,并发症发生率高。了解ERCP相关危险因素对于减少意外并发症很重要。

目的

确定解剖结构已手术改变的患者中与ERCP相关的穿孔危险因素。

方法

回顾性分析2009年4月至2017年12月在我院接受ERCP的187例解剖结构已手术改变的患者的病历。对患者数据进行分析,包括年龄、性别、重建类型、手术原因、ERCP目的、到达目标部位的成功率、操作成功率、不良事件、内镜类型、到达目标部位的时间和操作持续时间。对于毕Ⅱ式重建的患者,额外的潜在危险因素是插入内镜的形状以及吻合是结肠前还是结肠后。

结果

所有187例患者均有手术改变的解剖结构,如毕Ⅰ式(22例)、毕Ⅱ式(33例)、Roux-en-Y式(54例)、Child式或惠普尔式重建(75例)。ERCP用于胆管引流43例(23%)、取石29例(16%)、吻合口狭窄扩张59例(32%)。17例(9%)内镜无法到达目标部位,54例(29%)无法完成目标操作。不良事件包括胰腺炎(3%)、高淀粉酶血症(10%)、胆管炎(6%)、胆汁淤积(4%)、镇静过度(1%)、穿孔(2%)及其他(3%)。3例发生穿孔,均为毕Ⅱ式重建患者;在这些患者中,进一步分析显示内镜呈环形插入是穿孔的显著危险因素(P = 0.01)。

结论

解剖结构已手术改变的患者在ERCP期间发生穿孔的危险因素是毕Ⅱ式重建以及毕Ⅱ式操作期间内镜呈环形。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验