Lafci Ayse, Sahap Mehmet, Erdem Gokhan, Odemis Bulent
Ankara Bilkent City Hospital, Ankara 06800, Turkey.
J Clin Med. 2025 Jul 17;14(14):5099. doi: 10.3390/jcm14145099.
: Patients who have undergone Billroth II gastrectomy may develop gastroparesis, hypomotility, and reflux esophagitis. These patients are at risk of aspiration of gastric contents into the lungs when subsequently sedated for Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) procedures. The aim of this study was to compare conscious sedation and deep sedation in terms of pulmonary complications in this selected cohort. : Patients who had previously undergone Billroth II surgery and underwent ERCP procedure with sedation for gallstones or biliary tract strictures in a tertiary hospital between January 2020 and September 2023 were studied. Patient records were retrospectively obtained from the hospital information system. All the patients were divided into two groups as conscious sedation (Group CS) and deep sedation (Group DS). The groups were compared statistically in terms of pulmonary complications. : A total of 63 ERCP procedures were performed on 28 patients who had undergone Billroth II gastrectomy. There were 37 procedures involving conscious sedation (Group CS) and 26 involving deep sedation (Group DS). No statistically significant difference was found regarding pulmonary aspiration ( = 0.297) and other respiratory complications such as laryngospasm or desaturation between the two groups. In Group DS, it was observed that vomiting incidence was higher ( = 0.012), and airway maneuver requirements were increased ( = 0.007). : In patients who have undergone Billroth II gastrectomy, both conscious sedation and deep sedation techniques can be used effectively during ERCP procedures. The complication rates and patient outcomes of the two techniques are comparable. The occurrence of respiratory complications leading to adverse post-procedural outcomes requires careful monitoring and meticulous follow-up for these patients.
接受毕罗Ⅱ式胃切除术后的患者可能会出现胃轻瘫、动力不足和反流性食管炎。这些患者在随后接受内镜逆行胰胆管造影术(ERCP)镇静时,有胃内容物误吸至肺部的风险。本研究的目的是比较在这一特定队列中清醒镇静和深度镇静在肺部并发症方面的情况。:对2020年1月至2023年9月期间在一家三级医院接受过毕罗Ⅱ式手术并因胆结石或胆道狭窄接受ERCP镇静治疗的患者进行研究。从医院信息系统回顾性获取患者记录。所有患者分为清醒镇静组(CS组)和深度镇静组(DS组)。对两组在肺部并发症方面进行统计学比较。:对28例接受毕罗Ⅱ式胃切除术后的患者共进行了63例ERCP手术。其中37例采用清醒镇静(CS组),26例采用深度镇静(DS组)。两组在肺误吸(P = 0.297)以及其他呼吸并发症如喉痉挛或血氧饱和度下降方面未发现统计学显著差异。在DS组中,观察到呕吐发生率较高(P = 0.012),气道操作需求增加(P = 0.007)。:对于接受毕罗Ⅱ式胃切除术后的患者,在ERCP手术期间清醒镇静和深度镇静技术均可有效使用。两种技术的并发症发生率和患者结局具有可比性。导致术后不良结局的呼吸并发症的发生需要对这些患者进行仔细监测和精心随访。