• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

计算机支持系统综述的机遇——差距分析

Opportunities for computer support for systematic reviewing - a gap analysis.

作者信息

Hoang Linh, Schneider Jodi

机构信息

University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign IL 61820, USA.

出版信息

Transform Digit Worlds (2018). 2018;10766:367-377. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-78105-1_40. Epub 2018 Mar 15.

DOI:10.1007/978-3-319-78105-1_40
PMID:30637417
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6327959/
Abstract

Systematic review is a type of literature review designed to synthesize all available evidence on a given question. Systematic reviews require significant time and effort, which has led to the continuing development of computer support. This paper seeks to identify the gaps and opportunities for computer support. By interviewing experienced systematic reviewers from diverse fields, we identify the technical problems and challenges reviewers face in conducting a systematic review and their current uses of computer support. We propose potential research directions for how computer support could help to speed the systematic review process while retaining or improving review quality.

摘要

系统评价是一种文献综述类型,旨在综合关于给定问题的所有现有证据。系统评价需要大量的时间和精力,这导致了计算机支持的不断发展。本文旨在识别计算机支持方面的差距和机会。通过采访来自不同领域的经验丰富的系统评价者,我们确定了评价者在进行系统评价时面临的技术问题和挑战,以及他们目前对计算机支持的使用情况。我们提出了关于计算机支持如何在保持或提高评价质量的同时帮助加快系统评价过程的潜在研究方向。

相似文献

1
Opportunities for computer support for systematic reviewing - a gap analysis.计算机支持系统综述的机遇——差距分析
Transform Digit Worlds (2018). 2018;10766:367-377. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-78105-1_40. Epub 2018 Mar 15.
2
The effectiveness of internet-based e-learning on clinician behavior and patient outcomes: a systematic review protocol.基于互联网的电子学习对临床医生行为和患者结局的有效性:一项系统评价方案。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):52-64. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1919.
3
Systematic reviews in laboratory medicine: principles, processes and practical considerations.检验医学中的系统评价:原则、流程及实际考量
Clin Chim Acta. 2004 Apr;342(1-2):23-39. doi: 10.1016/j.cccn.2003.12.015.
4
The application of knowledge synthesis methods in agri-food public health: recent advancements, challenges and opportunities.知识综合方法在农业食品公共卫生中的应用:最新进展、挑战与机遇。
Prev Vet Med. 2014 Mar 1;113(4):339-55. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2013.11.009. Epub 2013 Nov 24.
5
Increased workload for systematic review literature searches of diagnostic tests compared with treatments: challenges and opportunities.与治疗相比,诊断测试系统评价文献检索的工作量增加:挑战与机遇。
JMIR Med Inform. 2014 May 27;2(1):e11. doi: 10.2196/medinform.3037.
6
Patient involvement in a qualitative meta-synthesis: lessons learnt.患者参与定性元综合研究:经验教训
Res Involv Engagem. 2016 May 12;2:18. doi: 10.1186/s40900-016-0032-0. eCollection 2016.
7
Scoping Reviews, Systematic Reviews, and Meta-Analysis: Applications in Veterinary Medicine.综述、系统评价和荟萃分析:在兽医学中的应用
Front Vet Sci. 2020 Jan 28;7:11. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2020.00011. eCollection 2020.
8
Promoting and supporting self-management for adults living in the community with physical chronic illness: A systematic review of the effectiveness and meaningfulness of the patient-practitioner encounter.促进和支持社区中患有慢性身体疾病的成年人进行自我管理:对医患互动的有效性和意义的系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(13):492-582. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907130-00001.
9
Capacity for conducting systematic reviews in low- and middle-income countries: a rapid appraisal.低收入和中等收入国家开展系统评价的能力:快速评估
Health Res Policy Syst. 2015 Apr 26;13:23. doi: 10.1186/s12961-015-0012-0.
10
Effectiveness of interventions that assist caregivers to support people with dementia living in the community: a systematic review.干预措施对帮助照顾者支持社区中痴呆症患者的有效性:系统评价。
Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2008 Jun;6(2):137-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-1609.2008.00090.x.

本文引用的文献

1
Producing Cochrane systematic reviews-a qualitative study of current approaches and opportunities for innovation and improvement.生产 Cochrane 系统评价——当前方法的定性研究以及创新和改进的机会。
Syst Rev. 2017 Aug 1;6(1):147. doi: 10.1186/s13643-017-0542-3.
2
Is there an optimum number needed to retrieve to justify inclusion of a database in a systematic review search?在系统评价检索中,是否存在一个需要检索的最佳数量,以证明纳入某个数据库是合理的?
Health Info Libr J. 2017 Sep;34(3):217-224. doi: 10.1111/hir.12185. Epub 2017 Jun 27.
3
Analysis of the time and workers needed to conduct systematic reviews of medical interventions using data from the PROSPERO registry.
利用PROSPERO注册库的数据,分析对医学干预措施进行系统评价所需的时间和人员。
BMJ Open. 2017 Feb 27;7(2):e012545. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012545.
4
RobotReviewer: evaluation of a system for automatically assessing bias in clinical trials.机器人评审员:用于自动评估临床试验偏倚的系统评估
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2016 Jan;23(1):193-201. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocv044. Epub 2015 Jun 22.
5
Methodological challenges when performing a systematic review.系统评价实施中的方法学挑战。
Eur J Orthod. 2015 Jun;37(3):248-50. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjv022. Epub 2015 Apr 6.
6
Systematic review automation technologies.系统评价自动化技术。
Syst Rev. 2014 Jul 9;3:74. doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-3-74.
7
Reference management software for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: an exploration of usage and usability.系统评价和荟萃分析的参考文献管理软件:使用和可用性的探索。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013 Nov 15;13:141. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-13-141.
8
How to perform a systematic search.如何进行系统检索。
Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2013 Apr;27(2):295-306. doi: 10.1016/j.berh.2013.02.001.
9
A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies.综述的类型学:对14种综述类型及相关方法的分析。
Health Info Libr J. 2009 Jun;26(2):91-108. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x.
10
How to write a systematic review.如何撰写系统评价。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007 Feb;455:23-9. doi: 10.1097/BLO.0b013e31802c9098.